Tag

DU

Browsing

The University of Delhi’s examination portal has left students distressed as enrolment numbers remain missing and subject-selection errors persist. Despite the portal being active since August, no official clarification has been issued, leaving thousands uncertain about form submissions ahead of the upcoming examination deadlines.

The University of Delhi’s examination form portal, which has been open for this session since August, has once again sparked student frustration. This time, a wave of technical glitches has left first-year students unable to access their enrolment numbers, while many across batches report issues with subject selection — raising concerns as form submission deadlines approach.

The University’s website outlines a multi-step process for filling the exam form: Firstly, logging in using enrolment credentials. Then, selecting the active examination session, choosing papers via the course-selection menu, and finally, paying the fee online, and waiting for college verification. While this digital system was intended to streamline work for the university’s 7-lakh-plus student body, it has also introduced new layers of technical dependency that are proving unreliable during peak usage periods.

For several first-year students, the problem begins at the very first step. The enrolment number field on their dashboard remains blank, which prevents them from completing the rest of the form. Without an enrolment number, the students in no capacity are now able to complete the submission process, pay their fees, or receive their confirmation slip, and ultimately, this would lead to a delay in releasing their admit card.

The portal of the University explicitly states that fresh students (“fresh/new student” category) may need to wait until their college/department forwards verification before their exam roll number is generated. In practical terms, this means first-years often find themselves waiting — yet many say the wait is already unreasonably long.

Aanya, a first-year B.A. (Hons.) student openly expressed her frustration, saying:

“It’s been over two months since the portal opened, but my enrolment number is still not visible. Our college told us to keep checking the portal, but nothing has changed. I’m worried that I won’t be able to fill out the form before the deadline.”

The problem, however, does not stop there. Many second and third-year students have reported errors in the subject-selection section, which either fails to load entirely or displays incorrect paper combinations. In some cases, the subjects listed on the portal don’t match those actually opted for during the semester.

Many students anonymously expressed their dissatisfaction, saying:

“When I finally logged in, the subjects shown were from last semester. I tried multiple browsers, even visited the computer lab, but nothing worked. The university hasn’t issued any clarification, and that’s what frustrates us the most.”

While deadlines for examination form submission have already been extended multiple times this semester, no official statement has been released by the Examination Branch addressing the technical lapses. Students say the silence from authorities has left them anxious, especially as colleges begin internal assessments and pre-exam preparations.

People are also worried about possible late fees, wrong exam entries, or missing admit cards if mistakes keep happening close to the exam date. For first-year students who are still getting used to the university’s online systems, the lack of clear communication has been particularly stressful.

The Examination Branch has not yet released an official statement explaining the cause of these technical issues or offering a timeline for their resolution, despite multiple student complaints and the delayed deadlines in previous cycles.

In previous years, the University issued advice to submit well before the last date to avoid any last-minute technical issues. But for this year’s batch, many feel that the system has already fallen behind. Some students have shared screenshots of the portal with blank enrolment fields, subject codes not appearing, and submission blocked.

Despite repeated attempts by students to seek answers from their respective colleges and the university’s Exam Branch, no fix or timeline has been announced. For now, the only message circulating is to “keep checking” — advice that does little to reassure students as exam deadlines draw near.

Thousands of students are still in limbo, waiting, refreshing, and hoping that their exam forms won’t be another victim of DU’s digital problems until the university sends out an official update or fixes the problems.

Read Also: Final Year of College & Still No College ID Cards

Image Credits: Devesh for DU Beat

Naincy
[email protected]

The Delhi High Court directed police to expedite protection for ex-DUSU president, Ronak Khatri, who reported receiving ₹5 crore extortion and death threats allegedly from gangster Rohit Godara via WhatsApp.

The Delhi High Court, in its hearing on Thursday and in a  bench consisting of Justice Ravinder Dudeja, ordered Delhi Police to expedite the request for police protection seeked by former Delhi University Students’ Union (DUSU) president Ronak Khatri, after he alleged that he received extortion and death threats from gangster Rohit Godara. He stated that  “to expedite the request for police protection” as sought by him, as he “perceives threat to (his) life”.  Additionally, the court instructed that until a decision regarding police protection is made, the beat constable must regularly visit Khatri, “at least once for the next two weeks to ensure his well being”.

 

Khatri stated that he received a WhatsApp message from a phone number traced to Ukraine, demanding ₹5 crore and allegedly sent at the behest of Godara. Following this, an FIR was lodged at the Narela police station. Khatri further informed that he is “not able to campaign and step out of my house”.

 

In response to this, the Delhi Police informed the court that Khatri has received the local Station House’s and the beat constable’s contact number. Khatri’s application for police protection and security has been forwarded to the DCP (Outer North), who has further  forwarded it to the Special Cell.  The police stated that since the threat assessment is still pending, the Special Cell will make the final decision on whether Khatri will be provided protection.

The Court, while addressing Khatri’s case, stated that:

This Court being the constitutional court is expected to further the constitutional protection of citizens. Since the petitioner perceives threat to his life, the DCP Outer North and DCP Special Cell are directed to expedite the request for police protection.

It  further directed that “beat constables and SHO be duly counselled to attend the call if made by (Khatri)”.

Read Also – DUSU Executive Committee Dates Released

Image Credits- The Print 

Divyanshi Dusad

[email protected]

India’s performance in QS Asia 2026 Rankings shows mixed results; while IIT Delhi leads nationally, Delhi University’s slip to 95th calls for renewed focus on research and global partnerships.

In the latest QS World University Rankings: Asia 2026, the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IIT Delhi) has once again emerged as India’s highest-ranked institution. Ranked 59th in Asia, IIT Delhi has retained its top spot among Indian universities for the fifth consecutive year, though it fell from 44th place last year.

Across India, the rankings reveal a mixed picture. 7 Indian universities made it to Asia’s top 100, 20 in the top 200 and 66 in the top 500. However, many top institutions, including IITs and IISc Bengaluru, saw declines in their ranks. The Indian Institute of Science dropped from 62nd to 64th, reflecting the increasing competition from East and Southeast Asian universities.

The University of Delhi (DU) maintained its presence among Asia’s leading universities but slipped from 81st to 95th this year. For one of India’s most prominent public universities, this decline highlights the need for renewed focus on research impact, international collaborations, and faculty-student ratios—key metrics emphasized by the QS methodology.

Despite the dip, DU continues to hold a distinctive position in India’s academic landscape, given its diversity, rich intellectual legacy, and contribution to social sciences and humanities research. Experts believe that with strategic emphasis on research funding, interdisciplinary studies, and global partnerships, DU could strengthen its standing in future rankings.

While IIT Delhi leads the national chart, the broader story points to a crucial transition for Indian higher education—one where greater emphasis on quality research and global visibility will determine which institutions rise to meet the demands of a changing academic world.

Featured image source-   QS Quacquarelli Symonds

Madhav Choudhary 

[email protected]

Delhi Police found that the alleged DU acid attack was staged by the student and her father, Aqeel Khan, to frame an acquaintance amid a personal dispute.

A 20-year-old second-year B.Com student enrolled under DU’s Non-Collegiate Women’s Education Board (NCWEB) had alleged that acid was thrown at her near her college earlier this week. However, investigations have now revealed that the incident was fabricated by the student and her father, Aqeel Khan, to frame the alleged accused, Jitendra, who is an acquaintance.

According to police, Khan has confessed to orchestrating the staged attack;

The evidence clearly proves that no acid attack took place. The father’s admission and the medical findings expose a deliberate attempt to misuse public outrage and waste police resources,” a senior Delhi Police officer said.

CCTV footage, call detail records, and eyewitness statements contradicted the student’s claims. Investigators found that Jitendra was at the time of the alleged attack in Karol Bagh.  His motorcycle, initially believed to be used in the assault, was parked there, and his mobile location also matched the Karol Bagh area.

Forensic teams found no acid residue at the spot, and no CCTV camera captured any such incident near the college gate. Doctors at RML Hospital confirmed that the injuries were superficial and consistent with toilet cleaner burns, not acid. Police concluded that the student had poured the liquid on her own hand to mimic an attack.

Sources said Khan’s motive was to take revenge and divert attention from another case. Days before the alleged attack, Jitendra’s wife had filed a complaint against Khan, accusing him of sexual harassment and blackmail during her employment at his garment factory between 2021 and 2024.

The police have now classified the case as false and registered an FIR under Sections 124(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita against the student and her father for misleading authorities and misusing public resources. Khan has been arrested, and further investigation is underway.

 

Image Credit: Navbharat Times

Anjali Kumari Jha
[email protected]

Read Also: Security: The Overrated Inconvenience During Fests at Women’s Colleges

A Delhi University student, reportedly enrolled in NCWEB, was injured in an acid attack near Lakshmibai College on Sunday morning, allegedly carried out by a stalker from her neighbourhood along with two accomplices.

 A 20-year-old Delhi University second-year student sustained burn injuries in an acid attack near Lakshmibai College, Ashok Vihar, around 10 a.m. on Sunday. According to police, the victim, a resident of Mukundpur, was on her way to the college for an extra class when the incident occurred just a short distance away. She managed to shield her face, but the acid burnt part of her hands. 

The incident came to light after the police received a call from the hospital. Delhi Police spokesperson said that based on the victim’s statement, a case has been registered and a search for the accused has been launched.

Preliminary investigation revealed that the main accused, Jitender, who was an acquaintance of the victim, arrived at the crime spot on a motorcycle with two others, Ishaan and Armaan. “Ishaan handed over a bottle to Armaan, who threw acid on her,” the police statement said. The three fled immediately after the attack.

The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Bhisham Singh, said, “On inquiry, the victim stated that she is a second-year student and had gone to Laxmibai College, Ashok Vihar, for an extra class. While she was walking towards the college, a man named Jitender came on a bike with his friends Ishaan and Armaan. Ishan allegedly handed over a bottle to Armaan, who threw acid on the woman. The victim tried to protect her face but sustained injuries on both hands. The accused fled the spot.”

Police said Jitender, who also lives in the Mukundpur area, had been harassing and stalking the woman for some time and had grown hostile following a quarrel a month ago. A team from the Forensic Science Laboratory inspected the scene, and CCTV footage from the surrounding area is being examined. Police teams are conducting raids to trace the accused.

The victim was first taken to Deep Chand Bandhu Hospital and later shifted to RML Hospital. Doctors confirmed that her injuries were not life-threatening.

A senior officer from Ashok Vihar police station said,

The victim has shown remarkable courage. She shielded herself and survived what could have been far worse.”

 

Read Also: Teachers’ Bodies Demand Action After Alleged Assault on DU Professor by DUSU Joint Secretary

 

Image Credit: India Today

Image Caption: Victim sustained burns on her hand while protecting her face.

 

Anjali Kumari Jha

[email protected] 

 

On Friday, the Delhi Government declared Chhath Puja on 27th October to be a public holiday. However, Delhi University has not declared an official holiday, sparking student outrage. While some colleges like Sri Venkateswara have offered academic leniency, the broader university administration remains unresponsive.

Chhath Puja, a government holiday, as declared by Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta, has yet again, been disregarded by the Delhi University, stirring up major discontent and controversy. While the capital city will be observing a holiday on 27th October, i.e., Monday, which marks the third and most important day of the festival, the Delhi University administration has retained the occasion in its list of restricted holidays, and has despite past outrage and a government-mandated closure of holidays, not kept it a holiday for its students. 

Chhath Puja is widely celebrated across Bihar, Jharkhand, and Uttar Pradesh by worshipping the Sun God or ‘Chhathi Maiya’. The Chief Minister, in her declaration, said, Through the worship of the Sun and Chhathi Maiya, Chhath conveys a message of purity, environmental protection and gratitude towards nature.” The erstwhile Delhi CM Atishi had declared a similar government holiday last year as well. 

This year, the official University mid-semester Diwali break was scheduled from 19th October till the 26th of October—incorporating Chhath Puja within this break would simply mean extending the holiday just by one day. This remains one of the major points of contention amongst University students celebrating the festivity as a 3rd year points out, 

I’m really disappointed that DU didn’t consider extending the holidays for Chhath Puja. It’s such an important festival for so many of us from Bihar and Eastern UP, and most of us travel back home just for these few days. One extra day would’ve made a huge difference because the travel itself takes so long. It feels like the university doesn’t really understand how significant this festival is for us emotionally and culturally.”

Such outrage has previously been noted amongst the students on multiple other occasions, such as on Maharishi Valmiki Jayanti earlier in the month, which was an officially declared public holiday by the Delhi Government.

However, classes for most Delhi University colleges were not officially cancelled. Students have argued that since DU is a Central University, and thus comes under the jurisdiction of the Central Government, it is unfair to assume that classes would be cancelled for the University. Despite this, students who have celebrated the Chhath Festival throughout their lives are disappointed towards the lack of sensitivity of the University administration and their inactivity in recognising and encouraging inclusivity for students of all backgrounds.

“A one-day extension would have shown some inclusivity towards students who celebrate Chhath. It’s a big deal back home for us,” a second-year Delhi University student said, 

It’s unfair that so many of us have to miss the celebration this year because classes resume immediately. Even a single-day extension would’ve allowed us to be with our families without worrying about the travel or attendance, especially when fulfilling the attendance criteria is imperative.”

This is not to say that all colleges within DU are completely indifferent to this public holiday declaration. The administration of Sri Venkateswara College has informed its faculty that no class tests, assignment submissions or practical tests are to be scheduled between the 27th and 31st of October, “to ensure that students are able to participate in the festive celebrations without academic inconvenience”, as intimated through an email that was sent to the teachers. A post by DUTODAY mentioned that many colleges across Delhi University are expected to adopt similar measures, subject to the respective departments and colleges. 

 

Read also: Sri Venkateswara Asks Faculty to Avoid Tests Post-Diwali Break; Some Say Assessments Still On

 

Image source: The Indian Express

 

Manya Marwah

[email protected]

Delhi University’s bold transition to a four-year undergraduate programme (FYUP) reveals a clear trend: humanities students and those in top-ranked colleges are embracing the change most enthusiastically. In centrally located colleges such as Miranda House, Lady Shri Ram (LSR), and Hindu College, nearly 40% of students have opted to continue for the fourth year, compared to an overall university average of about 30%, according to DU officials.

The highest continuation rates have been recorded in the humanities and social sciences, especially subjects like political science, English, psychology, history, and Hindi. In contrast, students in science courses show less interest in extending their studies. A DU official explained, “Many science students prefer to move on to postgraduate programmes at premier institutions such as IITs and IISERs, where they can specialise immediately.”

This makes the FYUP’s early success a story led by liberal arts and social sciences, traditionally popular disciplines at DU’s prestigious colleges. “At Miranda House, about 30% of students are continuing; Hindu College has retained 38%, and LSR has reported close to 40% retention,” the official said. However, colleges located on the city’s outskirts have seen significantly lower participation, with continuation rates ranging between 15% and 27%.

The divide, principals say, stems from differences in infrastructure, visibility, and student profiles. Centrally located colleges tend to attract higher-performing students and provide stronger academic and research facilities, while off-campus colleges face resource constraints. Still, some administrators see a positive side. “Smaller fourth-year batches give us time to fine-tune the system before scaling up,” said the principal of a South Campus college.

The new four-year programme, introduced under the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, aims to encourage multidisciplinary learning, flexibility, and research orientation. Launched in 2022–23, the programme offers three exit points — a certificate after one year, a diploma after two, and a degree after three, with the fourth year leading to an honours with research qualification.

Last week, DU officials held a review meeting with affiliated colleges to assess implementation. Some institutions reported very low enrolments, with fewer than 10 students in some fourth-year classes, posing academic and administrative challenges. Colleges have been advised to form clusters so students from different institutions can attend joint classes for similar courses. A DU Spokesperson says,

We expect participation to rise once students see the long-term academic and career benefits.

For many students, the decision to stay reflects career planning and academic ambition. Another final-year student from Hindu College said, 

The fourth year lets me specialise and focus on research. The ‘honours with research’ tag will strengthen my postgraduate applications and give me an edge professionally.”

As Delhi University becomes one of the first central universities to fully adopt the FYUP model, the transition marks a significant shift in India’s higher education landscape—one that places research, flexibility, and academic depth at the core of undergraduate learning.

Read Also: DUTA Demands Action After Professor is Slapped by DUSU’s Joint Secretary

Featured Image Source: The Indian Express

Richa Choudhary

[email protected]

    

 

The Delhi government’s new Saheli Smart Card offers free bus travel for women and transgender residents, but Delhi University students and commuters question its impact. With safety concerns and limited metro coverage, experts say true mobility requires stronger security, inclusive access, and reliable infrastructure beyond just free fares.

The Delhi Government is set to launch the Pink Saheli SmartCard on the auspicious festival of Bhai Dooj with the aim of digitising travel and replacing the Pink Tickets for DTC buses launched in 2019. This is a personalised travel smart card offering free travel on DTC and cluster buses for women and transgender residents, along with the option to recharge for other modes of transport. But does it really remove all the barriers which cause women to deter using buses? 

This card will be personalised with the name and photo of the user under the NCMC framework. The free rides will be restricted for the women and transgender residents of Delhi aged 12+. Applicants can register online on the DTC portal and complete KYC and Delhi resident verification for the card to be issued. The card can be recharged for paid use on other modes (e.g., Delhi Metro), but reports clarify metro rides are not automatically free under the scheme. It replaces the older paper-pink-ticket regime—but raises concerns about the exclusion of migrants, informal-housing residents and others without formal documents. 

Though, the willingness of women to use public transport is not an issue that can be cured by this initiative. Recent reports and viral accounts constantly remind us how unsafe and uncomfortable travelling in public transport buses and metros can be, even with the designated women’s coach. Especially for students, it is a major concern, as they have to regularly use public transport on a daily basis. A broader survey by UN Women from 2010 found that about 50% of women reported being harassed while using public transport in Delhi. And another source states that up to 8 in every 10 women surveyed in Delhi have faced sexual harassment during commuting or in urban public spaces. These numbers are extreme, but it’s agonising how they’re not really surprising for any of us. 

A large share of daily commuters in Delhi include students travelling every day across the city to different campuses. So it’s obvious that this policy is expected to include a student angle, which is especially imperative for the students at Delhi University—as DU student activism and union records show long-standing demands for subsidised metro passes and better university-run transport. Equity in transport access is clearly linked with academic participation, and women’s safety during this travel is one of the most important concerns. The student reaction to the Saheli card has been mixed, as it criticises the card for excluding metro travel, which is now more reliable than using buses. There is also a constant call for designated student passes for the metro to reduce dependence on long bus commutes. 

In conclusion, the Saheli Card can empower women only if free travel is paired with real safety reforms. Ensuring active presence of female wardens, better lighting in top commuter hubs, ensuring constant CCTV watch, and metro concessions will make Delhi’s transport both accessible and secure—turning affordability into genuine freedom of movement.

Read Also: Crisis Erupts at SAU: Students Protest After Alleged Gang Rape

Shreya Bhushan
[email protected]

Image Credits: Anonymous

Delhi University Vice Chancellor Yogesh Singh, at a Law Faculty event on hate speech, cited author Arundhati Roy’s past remarks on the Indian state as an example of divisive rhetoric, urging intellectuals to avoid such statements.

At an event on “Hate Speech and Electoral Politics in India” held at Delhi University’s Faculty of Law on 7th October, Vice Chancellor Yogesh Singh cited author Arundhati Roy’s past remarks about the Indian state as an example of hate speech. The event, organised to explore how language shapes public opinion and political narratives, became notable for Singh’s strong comments on what he viewed as harmful rhetoric from public intellectuals.

Quoting from one of Roy’s older speeches, Singh referred to her statement describing India as a “perpetually upper-caste Hindu state” that has been “at war with its own people” since Independence. In her speech, Roy had listed conflicts in Kashmir, Manipur, Nagaland, Punjab, Goa, Telangana, and other regions as evidence of this claim.

Singh remarked these statements as a pure definition of hate speech. Adding that such comments “pollute children and citizens’ minds because these statements are made from a very selective perspective.”

He further stated that public figures and intellectuals should avoid such statements since they influence young people and shape the discourse in ways that can harm national unity.

Singh said that hate speech often emerges from the public’s own biases and attitudes. “Politicians think that if they make hate speech, they will get more votes. Is it their fault or ours?” he asked the audience, noting that electoral incentives play a major role in normalising such rhetoric.

“We all should keep in mind that politicians are the smartest people in the country. They know the pulse of the people. If they realise they will not get votes by making hate speech, they will stop making such speeches.”

Read More: 32 Students Move Delhi HC Against DU’s LL.M. Practice Prohibition

Image Credits: News18

Juhi Bansal

[email protected]

While DUSU elections are indicative of a vibrant political culture all over campus, they have also led to safety concerns over and over again, especially for students of girls’ colleges such as Miranda House.

Year after year, the Delhi University Student Union (DUSU) elections create an increasingly unsafe environment in university areas, especially for women. This year, once again, Miranda House students allegedly faced several instances of catcalling, harassment, and invasion of personal space by campaigneers affiliated with the various student political parties. 

It was noticed that cars belonging to members of student parties were parked in a line in front of the Miranda House college campus, in addition to other areas in North Campus. This year, the gate most accessible by foot to the metro had been closed off for the pre-election and election time period by the college, citing security concerns. This obligated the students to take the long route to the metro station from the front gate. A student clarified,

It became really inconvenient for us—we had to walk through all the ABVP and NSUI party members who hung and drove around in groups, which became really uncomfortable at times. Even taking a rickshaw wasn’t an option sometimes due to the heavy traffic caused by their cars. This became especially bad in the week before DUSU elections took place.”

Several instances of Miranda House students being stalked, catcalled, and teased around and during the time of this year’s DUSU elections were recorded. Another mentioned;

On 14 September, when campaigning was in full swing, my friend and I were walking towards the Arts Faculty when a huge group of burly men gathered around us. They whistled at us, heckled us, and stared at us from head to toe. We were petrified and somehow made it out from there.

Miranda House College is no stranger to such incidents. During the 2023 DUSU elections, around 30 men allegedly affiliated with the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) entered the all-girls’ college campus without permission, and reportedly disrupted classes, created chaos and made the students feel uncomfortable. The college’s guidelines, in accordance with the University’s, regarding DUSU campaigning inside the college campus allow for only up to five people, including the candidate themselves, to enter the college premises at a time, that too with valid ID cards and permission from the principal and the police.

However, despite these rules, the next year saw a similar incident taking place, namely during the 2024 DUSU elections. This time, the former DUSU president Ronak Khatri, and the then presidential candidate for NSUI, reportedly broke the college gates and entered the premises forcefully, once again creating a hostile environment for the students.

The Miranda House campus has long been a space where women felt safe from transgression and obscenity, a principle which seems to be violated almost every year during the election season. This year, many students, both day scholars and pg-renters, even asked for classes to be cancelled around the election day, giving safety issues as a reason.

Image Credits: Free Press Journal

Manya Marwah
[email protected]

Read More: DUSU Elections Record 39.36 per cent Turnout, Up from 2024 Amidst Clashes and Controversies