Author

DU Beat

Browsing

Hrishita Lahon, a 22-year-old DU graduate from Guwahati, died on September 28 after a bus allegedly hit the bike taxi she was riding near Ashram Flyover. Police have registered a case but found no eyewitnesses so far.

Hrishita Lahon, a 22-year-old Delhi University graduate, died on September 28, 2026, after a bus allegedly hit the bike taxi she was travelling on near the Ashram Flyover.

Lahon, a resident of Guwahati, Assam, was an English literature graduate of Maitreyi College, DU. She was pursuing her master’s through IGNOU and was interning in Delhi at the time of the accident.

According to reports, she was riding pillion on a bike taxi from Lajpat Nagar towards Noida at around 10 am when a bus allegedly struck the motorcycle from behind. She was taken to a hospital in Sarita Vihar with critical injuries and died during treatment at around 2:05 pm.

The bike taxi was being ridden by Darab Singh, who was also injured. In a preliminary inquiry, Singh told police that a bus had hit the motorcycle from behind. He received treatment at a hospital but left before his statement could be formally recorded, and later travelled to Haryana for further treatment.

Police searched the area around the flyover and tried to identify eyewitnesses, but found no one who had seen the accident. The motorcycle is being examined as part of the investigation.

A case has been registered at Sunlight Colony police station under Sections 281 (rash driving), 106(1) (causing death by negligence) and 125(A) (act endangering life or personal safety of others) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Lahon’s postmortem was conducted at AIIMS, after which her body was handed over to her family. Police said further investigation is underway.

 

Image Credits: Times of India 

Also Read: Mukherjee Nagar Harassment Case: 3 Suspects Identified, Two Arrested

 

Aamna Rehman 

[email protected] 

Three LLB students of Law Centre-II of Delhi University (DU) have been suspended days after two students from Hindu College accused men in an SUV of stalking them. 

Three LLB students of Law Centre-II of Delhi University (DU) have been suspended from the institute and are not allowed to step onto any campus of the university after the filing of an FIR against them for allegedly stalking and harassing two Hindu College students in Mukherjee Nagar on September 23, 2026. The accused mentioned in the university circulars are Naman, Abhinav Kumar, and Abhimanyu Kumar.

At around 9:30 p.m. on September 23, two students of Hindu College were allegedly stalked by a group of men in a white Tata Safari. As per the complaint, the gang members made some remarks to the girls, abused them after they protested, and started following them. The complainant added that when both she and her friend tried to record the incident, the persons in the car tried to drag them inside the car and then left the spot.

An FIR was registered at the Mukherjee Nagar Police Station under Sections 78, 79 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) against Naman, his friends and the driver of the SUV. Police recovered the SUV alleged to be used in the case.  

Deputy Commissioner of Police (North West) Akanksha Yadav was quoted saying: “The individual driving the SUV has been identified as Naman, who is a student of Faculty of Law of Delhi University. We also came to know that two other students of DU were inside the vehicle.” Police had also mentioned that searches were being conducted for the arrest of the individuals. 

Abhinav and Abhimanyu were arrested on September 25 whereas Naman was declared absconding. It was reported in the Indian Express that Abhinav was arrested from Laxmi Nagar and Abhimanyu from Gurugram. The police probe is also looking into the complaint filed by the girl about approaching many police stations before registering the FIR.

The latest in the series of developments took place on September 28, as the Office of the Proctor issued individual suspension notices to each of the three accused students. These notices indicate that the said students have been suspended from attending their classes with immediate effect under Clause 3(e) of Ordinance XV-B of the Delhi University Act, 1922. This clause treats any kind of conduct, whether verbal or otherwise, which is derogatory to women as a gross case of indiscipline. The accused students have been prohibited from entering any part of the University of Delhi for the time being.

This case has also come up in the midst of wider debates by the students regarding the safety of women in spaces surrounding the University. 

 

Image Source: Delhi University 

Read Also: Mukherjee Nagar Harassment Case: 3 Suspects Identified, Two Arrested

 

Aeera Aroush Khan 

[email protected] 

ABVP Delhi’s announcement of a “Chalo DU March: For Women’s Safety” from Miranda House to the Faculty of Arts on September 28 has drawn online criticism, with students questioning its participation in a protest presented by organisers as student-led and non-political.

ABVP Delhi’s poster stated that “ABVP and DUSU stand firmly” in support of the call for women’s safety and announced a march from Miranda House to the Faculty of Arts at 3 pm. The announcement came amid student protests across Delhi University following the rape of a 17-year-old girl at Aastha Kunj Park.

The Miranda House-led “Hum Auratein Azaad Hain” march was independently organised by students and clearly described as having no political affiliation. The September 28 march was open to women and queer participants and raised demands including improved street lighting, better public transport and safer access to public spaces.

The organisers also circulated a statement objecting to ABVP’s involvement. Social media users responding to ABVP’s announcement similarly questioned the organisation’s participation, pointing out that the march was student-led and urged ABVP not to associate itself with the protest.

The criticism extended to DUSU Secretary Riya Chhawdi, who said she would participate in the protest. In a statement shared online, Chhawdi said she was joining “not because of any political agenda” and not on behalf of a political organisation. She described herself as a woman and the elected female representative of DU, and said women’s safety should not be reduced to a political label.

Chhawdi also urged students to put political differences aside and participate for the issue of women’s safety. Her statement came as DUSU publicly supported the cause. Recent reports have documented separate ABVP demonstrations calling for stronger security measures for women. 

The development has highlighted a distinction between the organisers’ stated non-political position and the participation announced by political student organisations. The discussion has since moved online, with students debating whether such involvement could affect how the protest is perceived.

Aarushi Chaubey
[email protected]

Image source: ABVP Delhi 

Read Also: ‘Hum Auratein Azaad Hai’: DU Students March to Reclaim Public Spaces

 

Delhi Traffic Police launches an anti-encroachment drive across Delhi to ensure people’s safety and smooth traffic movement.

The Delhi Traffic Police, along with local police and PCR units, has launched a targeted drive against illegal encroachment, illegal parking, unauthorised pushcarts, road obstructions, and markets. 

This drive came as a response after 2 Delhi University students were harassed, chased, and stalked by men in an SUV with tinted windows near Mukherjee Nagar.

According to the Statesman, during the enforcement action by the Delhi Traffic Police, 975 illegal encroachments were removed, 6004 challans were issued, 138 vehicles were towed, 114 vehicles were clamped, and 120 vehicles were impounded.

With the recent threat to women’s safety on campus, Delhi traffic police said in a conversation with ANI that their focus will be on vehicles with tinted windows, as they pose a safety risk, as well as triple-riding, drunk driving, and individuals driving bikes and scooters without a helmet.

The Delhi Traffic Police aims to strengthen this action to ensure college students don’t face threats to their security and can travel to and from college peacefully.

 

Image Source: ANI

Also read: Mukherjee Nagar Harassment Case: 3 Suspects Identified, Two Arrested 

 

Vanshika U Singh

[email protected] 

The Supreme Court clarified that its interim stay in the Akriti Chaudhary NSA case applies only to the strictures and compensation order against Noida DM Medha Roopam, not to quashing her detention.

 

The Supreme Court on Thursday issued a revised order clarifying the scope of its earlier interim stay in the case concerning the National Security Act (NSA) detention of Delhi University history graduate Akriti Chaudhary, confirming that the quashing of her detention remains in effect.

 

Chaudhary, a 25-year-old history graduate, was taken into custody on April 11, days before a workers’ protest in Noida escalated into violence over wage demands. The Uttar Pradesh Police subsequently invoked the NSA against her and activist-journalist Satya Verma on May 13.

 

On September 2, a division bench of the Allahabad High Court comprising Justices Atul Sreedharan and Achal Sachdev quashed Chaudhary’s detention, holding that it violated her fundamental right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. The bench observed that the detention order had been passed “without application of mind” and lacked supporting material. It further directed Gautam Buddh Nagar District Magistrate Medha Roopam, along with other responsible officers down to the level of the Station House Officer, to pay Chaudhary ₹5 lakh in compensation from their personal salaries.

 

The State of Uttar Pradesh and the District Magistrate subsequently approached the Supreme Court. On September 23, a bench of Justices Satish Chandra Sharma and NK Singh, hearing Solicitor General Tushar Mehta for the DM and senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi for the State, passed an interim order in chambers staying the operation of the High Court’s judgment. The phrasing of the order gave rise to an interpretation that the stay extended to the quashing of Chaudhary’s detention itself.

 

In its revised order issued the day after, the Court clarified that the stay was confined to paragraphs 27 to 33 of the High Court’s judgment — the sections containing the strictures against the District Magistrate and the compensation directive. Paragraph 25, which quashed the NSA detention, was expressly excluded from the stay. The matter will now proceed to a hearing on the merits.

Read also: Mukherjee Nagar Harassment Case: 3 Suspects Identified, Two Arrested

Image Source: The Tribune

Kaustubh Dwivedi

[email protected]

The University of Delhi has invited applications for its 2026-27 Financial Support Scheme, offering eligible undergraduate and postgraduate students fee waivers of up to 100 per cent based on family income.

The University of Delhi (DU), through the Office of the Dean of Students’ Welfare (DSW), has invited applications for the Financial Support Scheme (FSS) for the academic session 2026-27. The scheme provides fee assistance to full-time bona fide undergraduate and postgraduate students enrolled in DU departments, institutes, and centres, based on their annual family income. Online applications are open until October 13, 2026.

The scheme runs across two income categories. Students whose annual family income is up to ₹4 lakh fall under Category 1 and are eligible for a 100 per cent fee waiver, subject to a cap of ₹15,000 or the actual fee payable, whichever is lower. Those under Category 2, with family income between ₹4,00,001 and ₹8 lakh, can avail a 50 per cent waiver, capped at ₹10,000 or the actual fee payable, whichever is lower. In both categories, the waiver covers all fee components except examination and hostel fees.

Certain categories of students are excluded from the scheme entirely. These include students enrolled in DU’s constituent colleges, BTech programmes (barring those pursued at the Cluster Innovation Centre), five-year integrated law programmes, the School of Open Learning, and the Non-Collegiate Women’s Education Board. Students admitted under the Orphan Quota and students with benchmark disabilities (PwBD) are also ineligible, as they are already provided fee waivers at the time of admission. Students with an Essential Repeat (ER) status in any previous examination are also ineligible to apply, regardless of which income category they would otherwise fall under.

Applicants are required to submit a set of supporting documents along with their application. These include a copy of an EWS/OBC-NCL certificate or an annual family income certificate issued by a competent authority after March 31, 2026; self-attested copies of the latest income tax returns for 2025-26 of the student’s parents and unmarried siblings, with unmarried brothers required to be below 25 years of age, along with their respective PAN cards. A signed undertaking form and a bona fide certificate—signed by the Head or Director of the concerned department, institute, or centre—are also mandatory, alongside a self-attested marksheet from the applicant’s most recent examination and their latest fee receipt. Applicants must additionally furnish self-attested bank account details, either as a passbook copy or a cancelled cheque, with the student’s name, account number, and IFSC code clearly visible. Income certificates issued in the student’s own name, or those attested by a notary, will not be accepted.

The university has stated that the schedule for offline submission of the printed application form and physical verification of documents at the DSW office will be announced separately on the official website. Students have been advised to keep checking the DSW website for updates and can direct queries to [email protected].

 

Image Credits: https://dsw.du.ac.in/fss-2025-26/ 

Read Also: IPCW Announces Student Elections Following Earlier Refusal

Chandrani 

[email protected] 

 

DUSU elections 2026 face Delhi High Court scrutiny over alleged victory procession violations, contempt concerns and the use of money and muscle power.

 

Earlier last week, the DUSU elections concluded, bringing with them the familiar display of money, muscle and power that have come to characterise the student politics at the University of Delhi. Despite the Lyngdoh Committee recommendations prescribing safeguards for student elections, including keeping the elections free from any sort of political influence from the parties, violations continue to surface from time to time.

 

On September 18, a bench comprising Chief Justice D.K. Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia heard a plea filed by Prashant Manchanda, alleging violations of the Delhi High Court’s rule of no victory procession. The plea alleged that such processions amounted to contempt of court and were also in violation of the Lyngdoh Committee recommendations. The court had previously made it clear that no candidate or student of the university or supporter could take out a victory procession following the declaration of results. The court had also warned that the counting of votes and declaration of results could be stayed if the concerned authorities failed to take required measures regarding the “unruly conduct” during the election process.

 

During the Wednesday hearing, the court noted that all the show-cause notices had already been issued to DUSU candidates, including those who had won their respective elections and subsequently participated in the victory processions. Mr. Manchanda was asked to place all the relevant material related to these alleged violations before the court.

 

According to a report by The Hindu, the bench remarked, “This is not done. This is not done”, indicating the court’s concern over the alleged violations of its directions. However, on the positive side, it was also observed that in contrast to previous years, there had been a significant reduction in the defacement of public property. But the bench added that “much needs to be done.”

 

Senior advocate Kirti Uppal, counsel appearing for one of the candidates, argued that after winning the elections, people go through certain sentiments which are difficult to ignore or contain. She noted that such celebrations had remained relatively restrained this year and even dhols had not been brought out. Responding to this, the Chief Justice clarified that the drums were not the primary concern. Rather, he said, the difficulty lay in the show of “muscle and money power” by these candidates.

 

Read Also: IPCW Announces Student Elections Following Earlier Refusal

Image Source: NDTV

Ipshita Grover

[email protected]

Two DU students have been arrested, while a law student remains at large, in connection with the alleged harassment and stalking of two female students in Mukherjee Nagar.

 

In a development in the case involving the alleged stalking and sexual harassment of two Delhi University (DU) students by a group of men in an SUV in Mukherjee Nagar, police have found at least three suspects to be from the same university. 

The Deputy Commissioner of Police (North West), Akanksha Yadav, said, “The suspect driving the SUV has been identified as Naman, a student of DU’s Faculty of Law. We learnt that two more DU students were inside the vehicle, a white Tata Safari. We have seized the SUV and are conducting raids to apprehend the suspects. They will be questioned to ascertain if more than three people were involved.”  

As has been reported by the police, the woman alleged verbal abuse, passing of indecent remarks, followed by stalking and misbehaviour from the suspects. According to a video circulated online from earlier this week, the victim has clarified that she and her friend were returning from Vijay Nagar when the incident occurred. She further claimed that an SUV pulled up, the people inside rolled down the windows, and proceeded to make inappropriate remarks. When the women asked them to stop misbehaving and leave, the occupants reportedly hurled further abuse, made indecent remarks, and began following them. 

The woman has also said, “...when we tried to record a video, the car stopped, and the occupants tried to drag us inside. But when my friend took out her phone, they fled. We first went to Maurice Nagar police station, where the police personnel told us the place where the incident occurred did not come under their jurisdiction and referred us to another police station. We visited three stations…but no FIR was registered. From our sources, we identified one of the occupants. He had threatened us by claiming to be a relative of a Station House Officer (SHO)”

According to a report by NDTV, two of the accused, Abhinav and Abhimanyu were arrested on Friday, while the third accused, Naman is currently on the run. Police are also looking into the student’s allegation that she and her friend had approached multiple police stations before the complaint was registered. 

 

Read Also: DU students allegedly stalked, eve-teased in North Delhi

Image Credits: NDTV

 

Chandrani

[email protected] 

A solidarity march demanding safer public spaces for women and gender minorities was held across South Delhi on September 25, with students from Delhi University colleges taking to the streets following the gang-rape of a 17-year-old girl in Astha Kunj Park. 

The march remained largely decentralised and student-led with no formal affiliation to any political party. Members of the Collective were, however, also seen participating in the protest. Coordination and communication were primarily carried out through multiple WhatsApp groups. 

Students from various Delhi University colleges, along with those from institutions like AIIMS and IIT Delhi, joined the demonstration. The march began near Gargi College and proceeded towards Kamala Nehru College, with protesters raising concerns over women’s safety, inadequate infrastructure and restrictions on women’s access to public spaces. Reports from the protest noted demands for better lighting, security infrastructure and accountability around areas frequently used by students. 

Hindustan Times spoke to a student and revealed how they were publicly recorded in a metro, raising questions around privacy and safety. The demonstration unfolded in multiple stages. Students first marched on the road before moving to DDA’s Arun Jaitley Park for a public meeting, where participants discussed the demands being raised by the protest. The gathering later resumed as a night march at around 7 pm, with students returning to the streets as an act of reclaiming public spaces after dark.

The protesters opposed measures that restrict women’s movement in the name of safety. A major point of contention was the reported move to restrict access to parks after sunset, which protesters argued places the responsibility for preventing sexual violence on women rather than addressing perpetrators, policing and inadequate public infrastructure. Moneycontrol reported that protesters also criticised restrictions on women’s access to parks and called for stronger institutional accountability.

The march also expanded the conversation beyond rape to everyday forms of gender-based harassment. Protesters raised concerns about stalking, inappropriate recording of women in public spaces and the lack of adequate lighting and security around college-adjacent areas. 

At the public meeting, participants released the “Hum Auratein Azaad Hai Declaration”, a ten-point charter outlining their demands. The declaration calls for street lighting in roads, parks and public spaces, particularly around universities, slums and industrial areas; improved public transportation, including more DTC and shuttle buses and metro passes for women; and functional public toilets and menstrual-health facilities for women and gender minorities.

Speaking to DU Beat, another student emphasised the need to build collective solidarity beyond Delhi University, arguing that the movement should extend to central universities like IITs and AIIMs across the country. “For collective solidarity, this cannot remain limited to Delhi University. Students from central universities across the country should be brought into the movement so that the demand for women’s safety and the right to public spaces becomes a nationwide struggle.”

Beyond immediate security measures, the declaration places women’s safety within wider questions of economic and social freedom. It calls for more hostels and scholarships for women students, greater opportunities for women in STEM and professional fields, equal pay, and investment in public infrastructure such as anganwadis, creches, maternity homes, community kitchens and laundries.

The charter also addresses the treatment of women care workers, calling for recognition and dignity for workers in anganwadis, sanitation, hospitals and domestic work. It further raises concerns over the treatment of sexual violence as a matter of community “izzat” and demands greater accountability for public officials accused of sexual harassment.

Similar marches are scheduled to happen across Delhi University colleges. The protest thus connected the immediate demand for safer streets with a broader demand for women’s freedom to occupy public spaces without restrictions. 

 

Read also: IPCW Announces Student Elections Following Earlier Refusal

Image Credits: Satakshi for DU Beat

 

Tarunima Tayal 

[email protected]

Ceiling panels reportedly collapsed at Mata Sundari College, raising concerns over DU campus infrastructure. No injuries were reported. 

A portion of the ceiling in a washroom at Mata Sundari College for Women (MSCW), University of Delhi, reportedly collapsed earlier this week. No injuries have been reported in connection with the incident. 

A video circulating on social media shows multiple ceiling panels and pieces of the ceiling scattered across the washroom floor, with portions of the overhead structure appearing to have come loose. The footage also shows sections of the ceiling exposed following the collapse. The exact location of the washroom within the college premises could not be independently verified.

The incident has raised fresh concerns over infrastructure and maintenance in Delhi University colleges, particularly as it comes days after a similar infrastructure-related incident was reported at Lady Shri Ram College for Women (LSR).

While the two incidents occurred at different colleges, both have drawn attention to the condition and maintenance of facilities within DU campuses. Questions surrounding the regular inspection of ceilings, fixtures and other structural components remain relevant, particularly in spaces frequented by large numbers of students.

Mata Sundari College has previously faced concerns regarding campus infrastructure. Student reviews of the college have referred to issues including poorly maintained classrooms and other facilities, although such reviews do not establish the cause of Saturday’s incident.

No official statement from the college administration regarding the cause of the ceiling collapse, whether the affected washroom has been closed, or whether an inspection of the premises has been undertaken was available at the time of publication.

The incident adds to a longer-running concern over infrastructure at Delhi University colleges. Similar instances of ceiling or fixture failures have been reported across the university in previous years. With no injuries reported in the Mata Sundari College incident, the immediate impact appears limited. However, the recurrence of infrastructure-related incidents across university campuses raises questions about preventive maintenance and whether potentially unsafe facilities are being identified before failures occur.

 

Image Source: Collegebatch.com

Also Read: Fire Broke out at Gautam Nagar PG; Resident Alleges Safety Lapses

 

Sheetal Mishra
[email protected]