Author

DU Beat

Browsing

From women across Delhi taking to the streets to protest for basic human rights to people showing up in large numbers to participate at election polls to vote for their favourite Fat Dogs of Delhi. What do they have in common? They both merely strive to take space, and exist freely in an unapologetic form. 

In the midst of a city caught up amongst protests, infrastructural failures, rage and tragedies, Fat Dogs of Delhi, an Instagram account brought to life a knockout contest, introducing us to Tara, Golu, Hero and 60 other dogs who spent their days sprawled in forgotten and invisible corners of Delhi only to be thrust into limelight overnight, quickly became torch bearers of body positivity and our “Sunshine” in the dark (if you know, you know). 

“The election was clearly rigged” said a fellow voter, Apoorva, half-jokingly, when asked about her thoughts on the results of @thefatdogsofdelhi, “because there is no way Hero from Malviya Nagar didn’t win. He is and always will be the true winner in my heart.” 

Unlike most present-day politicians, the Fat Dogs of Delhi did not rely on malpractice, conniving tricks, or false promises to win the elections. In fact there was no propaganda or persuasion, just students and fellow dog lovers campaigning for their favourites with elaborate posters, fanpages, and a lot of unpaid but loving overtime work. 

And the final verdict rested on one single determining question—just how fat is that dog? And that precisely was answered by 92958 online voters and 1042 voters who travelled to physical ballots to vote, officially declaring Gola, Kebab, and Rajpal Singh (the same dog), who was contesting posthumously, as the winner. 

Through what came to be a modern-day internet “whimsy”, did more than just the average gain of views and followers, it gave to these dogs a personality and audience around which communities were built and introduced to one another. The longstanding love that people held for their neighbourhood dogs finally found a way: Tara was the pride of Khan Market, Mahakutteshar represented Noida, and Kutta Singh from Rohini was even openly backed by BlinkIt, along with students from Delhi University rallying for their college dogs, such as Sunshine from Lady Shri Ram College.

The most fascinating part of this discourse was how something so lighthearted and seemingly inconsequential evolved into tangible and meaningful impact. Initially celebrated for their size, the visibility and attention these dogs garnered has since been channelled towards their welfare, with major brands including District by Zomato, Sienna Made in Bengal and BearHugs stepping up to support their wellbeing and continued care. Googoo who rose to stardom competing for the title of Delhi’s fattest dog is now, somewhat paradoxically, enrolled in a weight loss programme at Jeevashram Foundation at Delhi. His diet is regulated and he receives consistent medical checkups.

Fat Dogs of Delhi is scarcely an isolated case of today’s youth using creativity and whimsy to navigate complex issues. From hand made creative posters and ingenious slogans, to satire and memes, “whimsy” has long served as a medium for political resistance. But perhaps what makes the Fat Dogs of Delhi so remarkable is that it has opened the door for wider conversations surrounding animal welfare and our conduct towards the animals with whom we share our streets. In a peculiar way, the campaign became a mouthpiece for the voiceless by helping them reclaim the streets they call home. 

Ananya Chaturvedi

[email protected]

 

Image Credits: Fat Dogs of Delhi Instagram

Read Also: ‘Hum Auratein Azaad Hai’: DU Students March to Reclaim Public Spaces

 

On this World Teachers’ Day, DU Beat sits down with Dr Neha Jingala, a faculty member in the Department of Journalism at the Delhi College of Arts and Commerce, University of Delhi. From navigating the corridors of DU as a student to returning to them as a teacher, she reflects on the classrooms that shaped her, the lessons she carried forward, and what it means to watch a new generation of students find their own place in the university she once called her own.

Rahul: Just to start us off here, could you take us back to the day you first walked through the gates of your college as a student? What were you feeling, and what were you hoping for?

Dr Neha: I can still recall the very first day I walked through the gates of DCAC, completely fresh out of school. I remember feeling as though my heart would fall out of my chest, while also being excited about the possibility of a new beginning. There was a sense of apprehension because everything was unfamiliar, but at the same time, there were aspirations in my eyes and a great deal of curiosity about what lay ahead.

As a journalism student, I was keen to understand everything around me. The city, the world, people, and, most importantly, how stories are found and told. I hoped college would give me the confidence, knowledge, and exposure to turn that curiosity into something meaningful and substantial.

Rahul: Do you remember the first person you met in college? And was there a person, a teacher, a friend, or even a moment that made you feel that you belonged there?

Dr Neha: I distinctly remember attending my first class at 8:30 am with Mr Sunny Thomas, a seasoned journalist who taught us Writing for the Media. His lectures went beyond the basic principles of writing. He spoke about what made a successful journalist. The curiosity, discipline, observation, sensitivity, and, above all, a sense of responsibility towards the profession and the people we report on.

Those early classes made journalism feel real to me. They helped me understand that journalism was not simply about writing well, but about being curious, asking the right questions, and understanding the world around you. In many ways, those classes gave me an early sense that I had chosen the right path.

Rahul: How was teaching on your first day?

Dr Neha: My first day of teaching felt surprisingly similar to my first day as a student. I was both apprehensive and excited. There was the natural nervousness that comes with entering a classroom from the other side for the first time.

However, as soon as I began interacting with the students, those worries gradually faded. Their curiosity, energy, and willingness to participate made me feel comfortable. Very soon, the nervousness gave way to a sense of connection and confidence. It also made me realise that, although the role had changed, the classroom could still be a space where I was learning and discovering things with my students.

Rahul: What part of DU feels the same as when you were here, even after all these years?

Dr Neha: The students are still just as wonderful. They are enthusiastic, ambitious, and inquisitive. They want to make the most of the opportunities available to them, ask questions, and explore as much as they can during their time at the university.

The excitement of college life, the friendships that are built, the conversations and chit-chat in the corridors, and the desire to do something meaningful at DU all still feel very familiar to me. In many ways, it is this youthful energy that keeps the spirit of the university unchanged, even as the institution itself continues to evolve.

Rahul: Is there any course that you learnt during your time here that you now get to teach? How has that journey been?

Dr Neha: Yes, I studied Print Journalism as a student, and today I get the opportunity to teach it as well. It has been an interesting journey because I now find myself teaching something I once learnt as a student myself.

The fundamental principles we were taught. The accuracy, clarity, verification, structure, and the importance of good reporting remain the foundation of print journalism. However, the field itself has changed tremendously over the years. Technology and digital media, particularly social media, have transformed the way news is gathered, produced, distributed, and consumed.

So, while the principles remain largely the same, teaching print journalism today is very different from what it was when I was a student. In that sense, it has been fascinating to come back to the same subject from the other side of the classroom.

Rahul: What was that one moment in your teaching career, like an epiphany, that made you realise that “yes, this is why I became a professor”?

Dr Neha: I don’t think there has been just one such moment. For me, it has been a series of small moments over the years. Every time I see a student grow, find their confidence, overcome their inhibitions, and go on to do something meaningful, I feel that I am in the right place, doing the right job.

There is a particular sense of satisfaction in watching a student grow not just academically, but also into a more confident, responsible, and thoughtful individual. Seeing that transformation makes all the effort worthwhile. Those moments, rather than one particular incident, are what continue to motivate me as a teacher.

Rahul: Has a student ever taught you something about the subject or maybe about life?

Dr Neha: Teaching is a two-way street. Yes, I enter the classroom as the teacher, but I learn from my students all the time. They bring fresh ideas, different points of view, new trends, and entirely different ways of looking at the world. Sometimes, those perspectives make me pause and rethink my own understanding or opinion.

This is particularly true of journalism because the media landscape is constantly changing. Students often have a very different understanding of how young audiences consume information, how platforms are evolving, and how new forms of storytelling are emerging.

In that sense, every classroom becomes an exchange. I may enter with something to teach, but I often leave having learnt something myself.

Rahul: There’s a common notion among professors that the batches each year are declining in quality, especially post-CUET. Do you feel the same? How do you think we, as students, can challenge that perception?

Dr Neha: I don’t think the quality of students is diminishing. Students today exhibit a high level of confidence and awareness; they bring new perspectives and experiences into the classroom. The best way for students to challenge such a perception is through their work. Stay curious, participate actively, ask questions, be proactive, and make the most of the opportunities available to you. Be willing to learn beyond the syllabus and engage seriously with the world around you.

Rahul: In all these years of having been a student of Delhi University and currently teaching here, what’s that one thing that you wish would never have changed, and one thing you’re glad has changed?

Dr Neha: One thing I hope never changes is the sense of community and the enthusiasm that students bring to university life. The friendships, conversations, debates, disagreements, and the sheer energy of being a student are what make DU special. I hope that spirit continues regardless of how much the university changes with time.

One thing I am glad has changed is the amount of exposure available to students today. Students now have access to many more opportunities, platforms, internships, experiences, and avenues of learning beyond the classroom. They can explore different interests and gain practical experience much earlier, and I think that makes a significant difference to their overall education.

Rahul: If you could sit beside your past student self for five minutes, what would you tell them?

Dr Neha: I would tell my younger self not to stress over everything and to have more confidence in myself. I spent a lot of time worrying about whether I was good enough, whether I was making the right choices, and whether things would work out the way I wanted them to.

I would tell myself to enjoy the journey a little more, take risks, learn from failures, and not be afraid of uncertainty. Not everything has to make sense immediately. There will be moments when you feel lost or unsure, but with time, many things do fall into place. I would simply tell myself to trust the process a little more.

Rahul: This World Teachers’ Day, is there anyone you’d like to thank, maybe a teacher of your own or someone who’s taught you something about life?

Dr Neha: It is difficult to mention just one teacher because I have been fortunate to come across many wonderful teachers during my school years and higher education. Each of them, in their own way, encouraged me, guided me, and helped shape the person I eventually became. They taught me not only through their subjects, but also through their faith in their students, their advice, and the goals they encouraged us to achieve for ourselves. I will always be grateful to them for that.

So, on this World Teachers’ Day, I would like to thank all the teachers who have been part of my journey and have contributed, in one way or another, to shaping the person I am today.

Dr Neha Jingala
Head of the Department, Department of Journalism
Delhi College of Arts and Commerce, University of Delhi

Interview conducted by
Rahul Kumar
[email protected]

Image Credits: Design Team, DU Beat

Read Also: DU Quietly Drops Credit Requirement for 2025-26 Batch, Teachers Ask Why

DU has exempted its 2025-26 undergraduate batch from the 28 credit requirement for promotion, with teachers raising questions over the timing and lack of explanation for the one-time relaxation.

Delhi University’s (DU) Controller of Examinations issued a notification this week exempting students of the 2025-26 batch from the credit requirement of earning 28 credits out of 44 for promotion to the next year. The notification says the decision has been taken with approval of the competent authority and that all other provisions remain unchanged. It does not say why.

The 28-credit requirement was introduced under DU’s National Education Policy-based Undergraduate Curriculum Framework, which mandates seven papers per semester. Under the framework, a student had to pass 28 of the 44 total credits from the first two semesters to move into the second year. That bar has now been removed for one batch.

The move has drawn immediate pushback from teachers. Abha Dev Habib, secretary of the Delhi University Teachers’ Federation and associate professor at Miranda House, said the university changed the passing criteria without explaining what circumstances made it necessary. She said,

“Passing criteria for a specific batch (2025-26) are being relaxed without explaining which circumstances, hardships or systemic failure warrant such a change,” 

She also pointed to a timing problem. Third semester classes began on 28 July. Results from the first-year examinations were still being declared through August. That means students entered their third semester before it was even clear how many had cleared the promotion bar, and the rule has now been changed after the fact.

Rudrashish Chakraborty, treasurer of the Delhi University Teachers’ Federation and associate professor of English at Kirori Mal College, alleged that the notification reflected incompetence in managing the growing number of papers under NEP and raised questions over whether the relaxation could benefit someone with political connections. The university has not responded to either allegation.

This is not the first time DU has quietly eased promotion rules mid-cycle. In November 2025, it decided to promote all 11,000 students in the 2024-25 postgraduate batch, including those who had failed or not appeared for exams, as a one-time measure tied to a curriculum change. The pattern of one-time exemptions, issued without public explanation and after students have already moved into the next semester, is what teachers say is doing the most damage.

Habib further says that

“Transparency and stability of the examination system are an important aspect for a good university. DU is being systemically damaged.” 

Image source: flickr.com

Read Also: “Dictatorial Exercise Of Authority”: Delhi High Court Stays Delhi University Student’s Rustication

Abhishek Goverdhan
[email protected]

 

Delhi Police detained over 700 protesters, including opposition leaders and student activists, on October 2, as roads were sealed and Metro stations shut ahead of a demonstration at Jantar Mantar.

Delhi Police detained over 700 protesters on Friday, 2 October, as demonstrators attempted to reach Jantar Mantar to demand the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar over alleged irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. According to Outlook, protesters put the figure at over 600 by the afternoon, while police officials later estimated around 700. Earlier reports, including one by The Logical Indian, cited more than 100 detentions.

Among those detained were Aam Aadmi Party leaders Atishi, Saurabh Bharadwaj and Sanjay Singh, All India Students’ Association (AISA) president Neha Bora, activist Yogendra Yadav and RJD’s Manoj Jha. According to South First, CPI(M)’s MA Baby and Brinda Karat, along with SFI and NSUI members, were also held. DY365 reported that some detainees were taken to the Badarpur and Outer North Delhi police stations, while Atishi posted from Fatehpur Beri police station.

The Week reported that around 350 students and activists had set out from the Vice-President’s House but were stopped before reaching the site. The Quint reported that 50-60 people continued protesting around Janpath.

Police had imposed prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita across the New Delhi district. It was reported by sources that 11 Metro stations were closed, internet services were suspended in and around Jantar Mantar, and Delhi Police, the Rapid Action Force and the CRPF were deployed. Police denied permission for the gathering.

The Logical Indian reported that an AISA delegation had submitted an intimation to the Parliament Street police station earlier in the week. Bharadwaj said police told protesters that permission had not been granted, and questioned why it was required at a designated protest site.

Bora alleged that police dragged citizens off the streets, and claimed on X that detained protesters were being released by people on the streets. The SFI alleged a “mass crackdown” on its activists. The Delhi Police had not issued an official count or detailed statement at the time of publication, according to the reports reviewed.

The Print reported of a similar protest on 25 September that had also led to detentions. A parallel demonstration was held at Mumbai’s Shivaji Park under heavy police deployment.

 

Image Credits: News Insider

Read Also: DTF Calls for Protest Against Show-Cause Notices in Hindu College

 

Vidhi Ramchandani

[email protected]

On Tuesday, police registered a case against a 23-year-old man for stalking and harassing a Second-Year student of North Campus over the past three months.

A second-year student of North Campus, Delhi University, alleged stalking and harassment by a 23-year-old man over the past three months.

The 22-year-old, hailing from Kerala and residing in Vijay Nagar, approached the police this Tuesday fearing for her safety. According to the cops, the woman knew the man through an acquaintance and also pointed out that he was a DU graduate who lived in Christian Colony, Maurice Nagar. She alleged that the man would follow her from college to her residence every day and repeatedly call her as well as her friends even after her objections. She added that the accused repeatedly said that he wanted to marry her. 

A case against the accused was registered at Maurice Nagar Police Station who was called in for questioning. The woman’s statement was recorded in front of the magistrate on Wednesday.

A friend of the woman, who wished to remain anonymous, said, “We are participating in protests for our safety, to be able to walk on the streets without any fear, and this is what is happening to our friend.” 

According to sources, the accused was arrested by Delhi Police on Thursday. Investigation is currently underway.  

The case comes shortly after another incident in which two Delhi University postgraduate students allegedly faced stalking and harassment by three men travelling in an SUV near Hakikat Park in Mukherjee Nagar. 

The incidents have unfolded against the backdrop of growing student concerns over women’s safety and their ability to access and move through public spaces without fear. Women students at Delhi University and other colleges have also been raising concerns through protests and public discussions around safety, mobility and accountability.

With the latest case now under investigation, questions surrounding the safety of women students travelling between campuses, residences and public spaces continue to remain a concern.

 

Image Credits: Hindustan Times

Read Also: Mukherjee Nagar Harassment Case: 3 Suspects Identified, Two Arrested

 

Sahaj J
[email protected]

A student enrolled at the Center of Innovative Skills-Based Courses was recently rusticated by Delhi University for alleged inappropriate behaviour. The Delhi High Court stayed the rustication, terming it a dictatorial exercise of authority.

A student enrolled in a six-month certificate course in bakery and confectionery at Delhi University’s Center of Innovative Skills-Based Courses, which operates under the Open Learning Development Centre (OLDC), was rusticated on 10 September. The university cited inappropriate behaviour in the classroom.

The Delhi High Court has labelled the rustication “dictatorial”, as it came without notice or a hearing. Justice Jasmeet Singh found it difficult to comprehend how a prestigious institution like Delhi University took such a harsh step without following the elementary principles of natural justice.

The court emphasised that an institution’s autonomy does not give it an arbitrary power to punish its students. It asked the university to file a response stating the basis of the rustication.

The High Court passed an order on 30 September saying, “The manner in which the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have proceeded is, to say the least, dictatorial… The very manner in which the power has been exercised, without notice and without hearing, bears the trappings of a dictatorial exercise of authority and cannot be permitted in a society governed by the rule of law.”

The court also said that it was the institution’s responsibility to place the student before it and hear her version before taking such an extreme step, which it found to be a complete disregard of the foundational principles of justice.

The court has allowed the student to continue the course while it awaits the university’s reply.

 

Vanshika U Singh

[email protected] 

 

Image Credits: Getty Images

Read also: Union Ministers Take Part In “Swacchata Hi Seva” Abhiyaan

Union Ministers Kiren Rijiju, Pralhad Joshi and Arjun Ram Meghwal took part in the “Swacchata hi Seva” Abhiyaan and visited various locations for a cleanliness drive on Thursday.

 

Education Minister Pralhad Joshi visited Gargi College, interacted with students, planted a sapling to endorse the “Ek Ped Maa Ke Naam” campaign, and swept the campus under the “Swachhata Hi Seva” programme.

Union Minister Kiren Rijiju visited Navyug School in New Delhi, whereas Minister of Law and Justice, Arjun Ram Meghwal, participated in the campaign at Safdarjung Tomb.A ‘Shramdaan’ drive was organised at the Safdarjung Tomb, in which two departments under the Ministry of Law and Justice took part, along with the Union Minister.

“It has been almost twelve years since the Swachh Bharat Mission was launched. Now, we are trying to further strengthen the campaign in a renewed manner,” Rijiju said. He also appreciated the students of the school, which comes under the NDMC, and said he was impressed by the awareness among students about cleanliness.

Union Minister G. Kishan Reddy said Prime Minister Narendra Modi had called upon people across the country to participate in the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan for nearly 30 days, from October 2, the birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi, to October 31, the birth anniversary of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel.

The Delhi BJP president and Union Minister Harsh Malhotra have organised cleanliness drives at around 2,500 locations across the national capital. Various Union Ministers and Ministers from the Delhi Legislative Assembly have come forward to take part in the cleanliness drive.

 

Image Source: Instagram 

Read Also: DU Graduate Dies After Bus Allegedly Hits Bike Taxi Near Ashram flyover; Police find no Eyewitnesses

 

Aridaman Singh 

[email protected] 

 

As the Hindu College Staff Association dharna continues, DTF has called for a protest demanding immediate withdrawal of show-cause notices issued against three faculty members amid concerns over admissions. 

On 30 September 2026, Wednesday, the teachers under the Democratic Teachers’ Front called for a protest march from Hindu College to the Vice Chancellor’s office for the immediate withdrawal of the show-cause notices and against administrative irregularities. This comes after the Governing Body of Hindu College issued notices to three faculty members for misconduct, indiscipline and insubordination. The three faculty members are Hindu College Staff Association President Dr Ratan Lal, Secretary Shankar Kumar, and senior faculty member Dr P.K. Vijayan. 

The teachers have been staging a protest on campus, raising allegations of serious irregularities in the admission process of Hindu College under the Sports and ECA category. The teachers flagged issues of algorithm failures and over-admissions while stating that the CUET and CSAS portal is prone to error and lacks transparency. The teachers accused the administration of turning autocratic as the Vice Principal continues its tenure despite the presence of eligible candidates. 

One of the Associate Professors, Dr Ratan Lal, had made statements, dating back to August, condemning the principal and claiming that he had “no confidence” in the principal. He also raised serious allegations, accusing the principal of a dubious role in admissions and pressurising the college statutory bodies. 

A meeting of the governing body was convened on 7 September 2026, which expressed its concerns over the statements, following which a public notice was issued to Dr Ratan Lal on 8 September 2026, in response to his public criticism of the principal and raising allegations of irregularities. The governing body accused Ratan Lal of acting in a prejudiced manner and described his conduct as unworthy of becoming a teacher. 

 

Image Source: Hindustan Times 

Read Also: HCSA on Dharna; Teachers and Students Confront Hindu College’s Administration

 

Tiya Mittal

[email protected] 

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday declined to entertain NSUI candidate Vijay Shankar Meena’s plea alleging irregularities in the DUSU presidential election, asking the university to decide his representation expeditiously.

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday, 30 September, rejected a petition by National Students’ Union of India (NSUI) candidate Vijay Shankar Meena challenging the result of the Delhi University Students’ Union (DUSU) presidential election. According to ANI, Justice Saurabh Banerjee directed the concerned authorities to examine Meena’s representation and decide on it within the stipulated time.

Meena, who contested for the post of president, had sought the quashing of the result declared on 19 September, in which Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) candidate Yash Dabas was elected with 24,576 votes. Meena secured 22,523 votes, leaving a margin of 2,053. The election recorded a voter turnout of 40.46 per cent across 52 polling centres, while independent candidate Deepanshu Shokeen won the vice-president’s post.

Filed under Article 226 of the Constitution through advocates Vimal Tyagi and Balaji Pathak, the petition reportedly alleged that certain election officials and faculty members took part in campaigning, contrary to the neutrality required under the Lyngdoh Committee recommendations and the DUSU Model Code of Conduct. It also raised variations in voter turnout across colleges and sought election records, including EVM and counting documentation.

According to LiveLaw, the court observed that the photographs submitted were undated and lacked particulars, and therefore could not be examined. Counsel for the university reportedly told the court that Meena’s representation, made only four days earlier, would be decided as expeditiously as possible, after which the petition was dismissed.

In a video shared by PTI via X, Tyagi said the petition was filed on the ground that professors serving as election in-charges had allegedly campaigned for ABVP and later raised slogans in its favour after the result. He said the petition “has not been allowed” by the court, but that the university had been directed to decide the representation expeditiously, adding that the petitioner would “avail the remedy available under law.”

 

Image Credits: Getty Images

Read Also: Three DU Law Students Suspended for Harassing Women at Mukherjee Nagar

 

Vidhi Ramchandani

[email protected]

DU’s Aditi Mahavidyalaya forms probe committee after two candidates allege vote-count gaps, EVM-handling lapses and outsider presence near a booth in its college elections.

An Aditi Mahavidyalaya probe committee has been set up to investigate allegations of irregularities in its college-level elections, The Times of India (TOI) reported. Two candidates have alleged discrepancies in vote counting and EVM handling. They also allege that non-students, including a BJP functionary, were near a polling booth on the day of voting.

The polls were held on 18 September, and all the candidates who won were backed by the ABVP. The ABVP had claimed its candidates secured all posts at Aditi Mahavidyalaya. On 21 September, Diya Chhabra, who contested for president, and Prachi Wadhwa, who contested for secretary, sent the college a representation alleging malpractice. The college informed them on 24 September that it had formed a probe committee.

The complaint rests on a result sheet submitted by Chhabra and Wadhwa. It shows 568 votes cast in all, 315 at booth 1 and 253 at booth 2. The tallies for individual posts fall short of that total: 563 for president (314 and 249), 539 for secretary (311 and 228), and 542 for joint secretary (311 and 231). The two have asked how many NOTA votes were cast and have sought the unedited CCTV footage of polling day.

They have made further allegations in their representation. They say an observer in booth 1 was not allowed to stay inside the polling area, and that EVMs were opened before voting without verification by the candidates. They also allege that a man who is not a student was allowed on the women’s college campus during the campaign and polling. They say he was seen near a booth on 18 September, between 11:30 am and 1 pm, with BJP MLA Ravinder Indraj Singh.

MLA Indraj Singh told TOI that he had gone to the campus as a public representative. He said the college falls in his constituency and that he had received complaints about some commotion there.

The two candidates have also approached the Delhi High Court. Their counsel, Shaurya Vikram, said it was troubling that a college was alleged to have manipulated vote counts and allowed external political functionaries inside. Calls and texts from TOI to the principal, Neelam Rathi, went unanswered.

 

Kaustubh Dwivedi
[email protected]

Image Credits:  NDTV

Read Also – Three DU Law Students Suspended for Harassing Women at Mukherjee Nagar