Tag

Slider

Browsing

 

The #ProudToBeR movement, though intended to reclaim a slur and promote empowerment, risks turning into a reckless spectacle that distorts genuine advocacy for women’s dignity, respect, and social awareness.

Divija Bhasin, a social media influencer, @awkwardgoat3 on Instagram, who is popularly known for challenging social themes, recently attempted to reclaim the slur usually pejoratively denoting sex workers, but not limited to that demographic, in response to the massive amount of hate comments that she receives where people called her a r**di.

Following this, several of her followers began using the hashtag, displaying the same on their Instagram profile bios. This also includes women who are pre-teens and underage—those who might not be fully aware of the semantic, social, and historical weight of the word.

The word, originally used to denote female sex workers and prostitutes, has now evolved into a derogatory insult which has been often used to easily target women who engage in any social behaviours that are deemed ‘unfavourable’ to society at large, but mostly men. Usage of this word is an ‘attempt’ to hammer a dent in a woman’s character. There has been an unfortunate normalisation of usage of the word, where it is used in daily conversations, flicked casually at the slightest inconvenience or irritation. Almost every woman at some age, at some place and in some situation has been subjected to the use of this word. And I’m no stranger to such experiences—I was labelled that in the 8th grade, at a time when I didn’t even know what the word meant. When I complained, my teacher dismissed it as nothing more than a “minor clash”.

The criticism for the same exists in a spectrum, varying in people’s reactions. Some argue that we can’t reclaim a word that has no neutral counterpart, which means that it is just plainly existing as a derogatory word without any terminology that could be a more respectful version of the same. An analogy of this could be derived from disparaging terms used for the African Americans and members of the LGBTQIA+ communities. While for the latter groups, it is clear who can reclaim the slurs used against them since the contours of membership are clearly defined, the former can claim no such clear delineation.  

Some question why Divija has chosen to reclaim a word that was never hers to begin with. As a woman, it’s one of the most unhealthy manifestations of chauvinism and a projection of the toxic male ego onto them. It is simply more effective to call out the problematic nature of a deeply insulting word than to reclaim it with pride because the onus then lies on the person propagating it to visualise the political correctness of using this word with pride. 

The third argument that we make here is how just the act of attempting to reclaim this word reeks of the privilege of being from an elite upper-class background. It is essential to call out the lack of sensitivity and understanding of the realities of living in vulnerable conditions, like sex workers who are deeply exploited in a country like India and have to fight tough battles every day, not just because of their work but because of the fact that it’s never stripped from their identity, which ultimately never gains them acceptance as being a ‘normal’ person with feelings and expectations. 

I believe that confronting hateful and demeaning remarks with conviction is a strong and necessary response. Yet, urging followers to inundate platforms with hashtags they scarcely grasp reflects a troubling lapse in responsibility—particularly from someone whose reach and words hold the power to frame narratives and shape perception. 

Through the course of writing this piece, my social media algorithm revealed a deeply unsettling trend. The incident seems to have emboldened certain voices to dismiss genuine advocacy for women’s dignity and the urgent need to instil basic respect and appropriate conduct toward women in Indian society. This, in turn, has fuelled a dangerous narrative — one that misleads people, especially teenage and young adult men, into believing that calls for respect are exaggerated, performative, or undeserving of serious attention. Under the overbearing weight of memes that celebrate and cherish this propaganda, let’s not forget the duty we carry as members of a society where women, with each passing minute, are shamed, raped, hit, acid-attacked and burnt because of the grave power asymmetry between the genders and their roles. 

As a deeply divided society, we must confront a difficult question: where do we draw the line between advocacy and mockery? Both, when taken to their extremes, risk devolving into radicalisation and perversion on one end and bullying on the other. While this movement may have been met with resistance from the majoritarian perspective, it should instead ignite meaningful discourse. It stands as a stark reminder that it is long overdue for us to grant women the verbal justice they deserve—and to stop normalising their vilification simply for daring to rationally speak up, just because our deeply entrenched, insecure and patriarchal mindset can’t handle it.

Read Also: Patchwork Feminism: Are Women Truly Capable With Just Education Alone?

Image Credits- UN Women 

Divyanshi Dusad 

[email protected]

When cultural brilliance meets coastal vibes, you get Waves – and this year’s edition proved why it’s one of India’s most anticipated college fests.

From October 31st to November 2nd, BITS Pilani’s Goa campus transformed into a cultural powerhouse, hosting Waves 2025 – three days of electrifying performances, fierce competitions, and memories that’ll last way beyond the fest hangover. With over 8,000 participants from 150+ colleges converging on one of India’s most vibrant locations, Waves proved once again why it’s rapidly climbing the ranks as one of the country’s largest student-run cultural festivals.

The Star-Studded Lineup

Let’s talk about what everyone was really there for – the nights that made us lose our voices (in the best way possible).

Day 1 kicked off with Aditya Rikhari setting the perfect tone for the fest. The indie vibes had everyone swaying under the Goan sky, listening to “Sahiba” and honestly, is there a better way to start a cultural fest than with some solid indie music?

Day 2 brought the house down – literally. Sunidhi Chauhan graced the Bollywood Night, and if you’ve ever wondered what 5,000+ people singing along to “Sheila Ki Jawani” sounds like, well, you missed out. The energy was absolutely electric, with the Bollywood diva delivering hit after hit that had the entire crowd on their feet.

Day 3 wrapped things up with a bang as DJs Krispy Kristina and Ravator took over for the EDM Night. The bass drops, the light shows, the collective jump when the beat drops – it was the perfect crescendo to three unforgettable days.

 

Beyond the Headliners: Where Competition Meets Creativity

But Waves isn’t just about the celebrity performances (though let’s be honest, they’re pretty hard to beat). The fest hosted over 40 events. The competition was fierce, the talent was insane, and the stakes were high.

The Big Four – Waves’ flagship events – saw some of the most intense showdowns:

  • Natyanjali brought dance crews battling it out in what’s essentially the Olympics of group dance competitions
  • Sea Rock proved why it’s the country’s largest semi-professional band competition, with eliminations held across 12 cities before the grand finale
  • FashP (Fashion Parade) turned the auditorium runway into a spectacle of design and choreography
  • Mr. & Ms. Waves tested personalities and talents, with finalists going thro

    ugh intense rounds over all three days

Then there’s Sizzle – the solo street-dance competition that always draws massive crowds and has racked up millions of views on YouTube. Picture a dance battle, but make it college fest level, with students forming circles and losing their minds over every killer move.

And if you thought that was all, think again. Waves also hosts a 

Prom Night – because what’s a cultural fest without some elegant, dressed-up vibes? It’s the perfect breather between high-energy competitions, giving attendees a chance to slow down, dress to impress, and create some Instagram-worthy moments.

The Verdict

If you’re still reading this and thinking “damn, I should’ve been there” – well, you’re right. But here’s the good news: Waves is only getting bigger and better. With its explosive growth, massive footfall, and consistently impressive lineups, this is one fest that deserves to be on every college student’s bucket list.

Whether you’re into dance battles, comedy nights, fashion shows, or just want to vibe to some incredible music in Goa, Waves has something for everyone. The 2025 edition might be done and dusted, but it’s set the bar pretty high for next year.

Mark your calendars for Waves 2026, folks. If this year was any indication, you really don’t want to miss it.

For updates on Waves 2026, follow @wavesbits on Instagram and check out the official website at register.wavesbits.org. Trust us, you’ll want to be there when the next edition rolls around.

 

Where capitalism towers and faith flickers, Mamdani performs, turning promises into tricks, doubt into devotion, and New York into a restless audience.

 

Magic. It is why this society dreams. A little part of us that industrialisation couldn’t take away. A part that remains with us, even after the ripe age when we all become machines. The concept which makes materialism thrive, which makes money an agent. A gateway to the impossible. It replenishes faith and births belief. And when it intersects with reality, we call it a trick

 

A magic trick typically has three separate acts. The first one is The Pledge—when the magician presents something ordinary, something without a story, like a hat. The second is The Turn—when that ordinary turns into something extraordinary, something stupefying and confusing but believable; a pigeon out of a hat. The last is The Prestige—the most difficult part. The part which validates the audience’s hope for the existence of magic, something that gives them a reason to turn it into instinct. Revealing that magic is no secret—by the show of empty hands. Becoming a story with an ultimate cliffhanger. 

In my world, Zohran Kwame Mamdani is a magician. Now, let’s walk through his acts together. 

The Pledge

A very simple man has become the new mayor-elect of the world’s richest country’s richest city. A self-proclaimed socialist on the throne of New York City—arguably the most capitalist city in the world and home to most billionaires. His campaign was strong, as it was straightforward. He is now set to become the city’s first Muslim and South Asian mayor and its youngest in over a century. He began by walking the streets of NYC and asking people about their problems. Later, he designed a campaign targeting these issues and announced that he would be standing for elections—defying all rules of politics, economics and statistics. 

His agenda, to me, is simple—find where it hurts and promise a 100% effective painkiller. And he did just that. He focused on an agenda, something that can be absorbed by the common person. Something that objectively promises a better life. And for New Yorkers, it was affordability, an issue that his predecessor, Eric Adams, a fellow democrat, didn’t address. This instilled a belief in people—a desire to trust something bigger than themselves. Ordinary, yet powerful. 

The Turn

This is where the extraordinary part comes in. He appealed to the people of NYC with claims of taxing the rich. He stated an increase in the corporate tax from 7.25% to 11.5% and a 2% income tax surcharge on individuals making more than $1 million per year. Just enough to get the wealthy annoyed, but not touching their core wealth—their assets at all. 

Contrary to popular belief, real estate is the engine that runs NYC, not finance. The city’s growth is directly measured by its unaffordability. And Zohran is targeting that ruthlessly. This could easily backfire with extreme economic losses because of the reallocation of investors and the wealthy moving their capital elsewhere to escape taxes. This is not sustainable. A socialist city surrounded by a capitalist world suffers capital flight. It just means a reallocation of the cause of inequality. 

But Zohran wants regulation, not a total structural reform. His aim is to accomplish the impossible—to give his best try towards equity for all. He limits his beliefs to what is practical. But he faces backlash for the river of his ideology, not the cup of water from it that he’s offering to NYC. What he wants is public infrastructure parallel to the lavish private ownership in the city—more public housing, city-run grocery stores, and free transit—that provides relief and alternative structures without dismantling the entire capitalist system. 

 

The Prestige

Finally, the last act. The part where his crusade becomes inscrutable, mystifying. So much so that people (his audience) become almost mesmerised into placing their entire trust in him. The part where his illusion becomes so strong that it becomes instinct for the people of NYC, that even when evidence suggests otherwise, their faith denies it. Until now, NYC has been shaped by neoliberalism. Zohran isn’t an extremist, but the one word which defines him is. Socialism. People unable to understand the nuances of a socialist economy become victims of bigotry. Their attachment to a leader becomes an attachment to an idea that they can only half comprehend. This is what gives rise to debate, making Zohran’s campaign immortal.  

 

He faces criticism for describing “Globalise the Intifada” as a symbolic call for Palestinian human rights, not for violence or antisemitism. It reflects his very evident thought pattern—supporting whatever is morally right. He focuses on the core strength of an idea but ignores its effects, just like the impact of socialist agendas on NYC’s capitalist economy. But that’s what makes his magic real. His own belief in the illusion, irrespective of the reality. 

Conclusion

As it is with all tricks, this story remains unfinished. The ultimate cliffhanger becomes whatever manifests when he claims his office. His image—the illusion he created to win the campaign—is one thing. He owes his win to the loophole between realists and relativists. But now it’s time to act on it. If he actually pursues his claims, he will have to face the New York State jurisdiction and the cumulative force of all the most powerful people in the world against him. And if he doesn’t, he faces massive protests by the common people of NYC who were promised more affordable lives. 

But there’s another option. What if he accomplishes both? What if he finds a way that promotes his idea of affordability without facing a backlash from the wealthy? Right now, he faces capital flight, operational risks and long timelines—most of whose cost is imminent before benefits. However, perhaps he gradually implements progressive taxes with tied incentives (like credits for investment in housing or green projects) or private-public partnerships so that the growth seems mutual, not anti-rich. This would mean him calling the first-row audience members up on the stage before the curtains roll. 

 

Nonetheless, in my world, Zohran Kwame Mamdani remains a magician—living his illusion. 

Read Also: “One day we logged in, and then we never logged out.” DUB speaks to Ria Chopra

Image Credits: The Financial Times

Shreya Bhushan

[email protected] 

 

An alumnus of LSR, Ria Chopra is a freelance writer and creative consultant, and (un)officially the neighbourhood internet anthropologist. Chopra’s pop culture trivia reels and the Gen Z analysis essays have earned widespread acclaim. With her debut non-fiction book, Never Logged Out, in the pre-order phase, DU Beat reached out for a conversation about Gen Z and the Internet Culture.

Shikhar: If you had to pick one pop culture moment that stands out as your personal favourite, what would it be? Which one, in your view, has had the strongest influence on this generation?

Ria Chopra:  I have too many favourites to be able to pick one, but a recent one would be Zeenat Aman’s Instagram debut and the posts and writing she would publish on the platform. It was lovely in all aspects: to see an older person engage with social media, to have such a legacy star reveal their innermost thoughts and feelings in moments when they were at the peak of their fame. I think the most influential one would be any of the large-scale changes in the world of internet and social media: the advent of Jio, the launch of Instagram Reels, or even the gradual change in social media from being a space of connection to a space of commerce. I think these have had deep-seated impacts on how Gen Z engages with the world around them.

Shikhar: The internet has increasingly become a “third space” for our generation, especially in the post-COVID world. How do you see this shaping the experiences and interactions of DU students?

Ria Chopra: Should we call it that? I think one of the prerequisites of being a third space is that it should be accessible to everyone, and while it may be easy for us to overlook this, the internet is still out of reach for many women, lower-income groups, etc. It is also an inhospitable place for many people to be their fullest selves. That being said, I do agree that it has become a huge space of interaction and interpersonal engagement—for many people, digital socialising is where it’s at. Amongst DU students, I see a lot of intergroup conversation online; on the r/delhi subreddit, for instance, or Twitter threads and Instagram pages, which have DU students sharing experiences and trying to help each other. Hyperlocal communities of this sort can be extremely useful and supportive, especially for young adults, and I love that this has translated to the digital world too.

Shikhar: Pop culture shapes much of our daily lives, from our outfits to the phrases we use. Do you think internet culture and fandom discourse have begun to replace traditional political and literary forms of expression?

Ria Chopra: I don’t think so. Pop culture, along with literary and political discourse, has always been one of the vocabularies of expression that exist. In fact, I would say that pop culture, internet culture, and literary culture references can all fall under the overarching umbrella of political expression. Something I like to say is that the “personal is cultural”, and as we all know, the personal is political too. There’s a false discourse being created online about internet/pop culture vs literary/artistic discourse, which I think has been overblown. One replacing the other or being good/bad compared to the other isn’t true. I think dissecting pop culture and internet culture can be a very politically expressive act, while it is also entirely possible to uncritically engage with literature (like the ‘Performative Man’ trend) and hence strip it of its depth entirely. As long as we are thinking, we are good.

Shikhar: In recent years, cinephile and pop culture circles have developed a sense of elitism, where people look down on others for not recognising references. This often ties back to unequal access to cultural capital and knowledge. Do you think pop culture is losing its essence as a middle ground between high and low culture? 

Ria Chopra: Our cultural knowledge has always been a function of our privilege—of the language we speak, the money we have, the access we enjoy, and the things we are allowed to engage with. This is why I would rebel against describing anything as ‘high-brow’ or ‘low-brow’—who decides what the ‘high’ and the ‘low’ is? Elitism or snootiness in art domains simply represents a set of people unwilling to accept their own privilege and to try to understand art in other ways. Whenever I see ‘cinephiles’, critics or anyone else looking down on others for not getting references, I just zone out and move on—I can’t bring myself to respect that kind of discourse. 

Shikhar: The revival of Y2K aesthetics and 90s cinema among today’s students comes with varied interpretations. Some call it commercialised nostalgia. What, in your view, drives Gen Z’s fascination with the 90s and 2000s?

Ria Chropra: Multiple factors, the largest one being a huge sense of crisis permeating our existence today, birthing in us a desire to retreat into a warmer, safer cocoon of what feels like a better time—our childhood. Many of us older Gen Zs also remember that time tangibly: the early days of the internet, the early sense of rebellion in OTT, the drive of playfulness on websites and social media, and yearn for that feeling of discovery and curiosity that used to exist in our pop culture and internet culture experiences. It felt more fun, you know? I talk about this in my upcoming book too, but I think there’s also a generational coming-to-terms right now with the effects the internet has had on us. In other words, one day we logged in, and then we never logged out, is the title of my book too. I do think that nostalgia is rose-tinted, though it was a horrible time politically—feminist conversations weren’t as mainstream as they are now, and society wasn’t as progressive as it is now. So we should be careful what we wish for.

Shikhar: One question I love asking everyone: who’s your favourite pop culture icon? And what’s one piece of pop culture you’d recommend everyone experience?

Ria Chopra: I hate this question. How am I supposed to pick one? If you force me, at gunpoint, to say it, then my favourite pop culture icon is Shah Rukh Khan, obviously. Pop culture I’d recommend everyone experience is the entirety of AR Rahman’s Bollywood work (I’m a Hindi speaker, so I connect more with his work which is in Hindi, though his work in other industries is also great), and also the full 16-video YouTube series of the Berklee College of Music’s rendition of his music.

 

Read Also: Social Media Vilification of the Nerd Archetype

Image Credits: Sanjana Chopra

Shikhar Pathak

[email protected]

Many issues regarding SBSC’s infrastructure, particularly with the canteen and water tank, have come to the foreground as students and their union raise their voices against it. The water tank was cleaned, which stands in contrast to the slow replacement of the canteen vendor.

A video showing the condition of the evening canteen, where there were rats roaming and eating the food, had spread amongst campus recently. As the video circulated, many people demanded that the college replace its vendor. After pressure from students and its union, Krishan Dev Fast Food, vendor of the canteen, stepped down on 31st October. 

However, after the vendor stepped down, there was no replacement in sight. In a show cause notice issued by the college, it revealed that the student union was directed to assist the canteen committee but had failed to recommend a suitable vendor. Many criticised this, as students were left without a suitable canteen, and some called it a ‘PR stunt’. 

 

The student union responded to the criticism by explaining that the delay had occurred due to pending admin work and waiting for the evening student union’s input. They had already submitted 3-4 tenders with suggestions. Furthermore, the message stated that the root issue was infrastructure, which is under the college administration; hence, it is unfair to criticise the student union for the infrastructure’s shortcoming. 

In a recent post, the student submitted its finalised list of canteen vendors after looking at other colleges’ vendors. They suggested GD Goenka and the canteen vendor of Matasundari/Ramaujan college. 

Videos had circulated of monkeys drinking from the water tank and ants inside of it. The union raised this issue with the college administration. The official account of the student union, on November 1st, posted that the cleaning process had taken place and had checked the TDS level of the clean water, which was suitable for drinking. 

While issues regarding the infrastructure are raised constantly, many question the lack of urgency in action and why there are constant issues with the college infrastructure in the first place.

Read Also: Infrastructure and Accommodation Woes Continue to Trouble IPCW Students

Image Credits: @sbscduofficial on X

Anonymous

DU Beat

As the capital is once again swept under smog this year, students are compelled to worry about their health, class attendance, constant coughing and semester-end exams simultaneously.

Every year, as the AQI in Delhi reaches new heights, students studying in the city must attempt to normalise hazardous environmental conditions.

In conversation with DU Beat, Jigisha Sharma, a second-year student from Miranda House, said, “For a university that has a whole course about Fit India, they aren’t very keen on keeping their students fit and away from the pollution of Delhi. Instead of taking any action to tackle the situation, the government is blatantly trying to hide it from the masses, further worsening the situation for both the city and her residents.” 

Himanshi Singh, another Miranda House student, said, “Having lived my entire life in another city, I was aware that Delhi had pollution problems, but actually experiencing it is something else entirely. The air feels heavy and almost unbreathable, and stepping outside for even a few minutes leaves you coughing or with a sore throat. It’s scary how normal this has become for everyone here. What really bothers me is how we’re all expected to just carry on with our routines, like attending classes and travelling long distances, as if this level of air toxicity is something we can simply adjust to.

Colleges and the university administration seem indifferent, which feels unfair to students who are genuinely struggling with the health impact of this air. Especially for those of us who’ve just moved to Delhi, it’s physically and mentally draining to adapt to this environment. Because right now, it feels like we’re being forced to breathe poison and pretend it’s fine. Every year, the AQI spikes, people complain, and then everyone moves on until it happens again.”

Last year, the University had declared a transition to online classes when the AQI had reached alarmingly high levels. However, despite GRAP Stage 3 being implemented this year and the AQI reportedly touching 764 in Delhi-NCR, which can be officially categorised as “hazardous”, there has been no official notification from the administration regarding any relief to be provided to the students in the form of breaks, transition to the online mode, or leniency in the attendance policy. 

Read Also: The Trade-off Between Half Dust and Half Deity

Image credits: Ayushmaan for DU Beat

Manya Marwah

[email protected]

DUSU Joint Secretary and ABVP member Deepika Jha has been suspended from her post for two months after the assault that took place in B.R. Ambedkar College on Professor Sujit Kumar. 

DUSU Joint Secretary, Deepika Jha, a member of Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP)  has been suspended for two months following the assault on Dr. B.R. Ambedkar College Professor Sujit Kumar. The order, issued by the Office of the Proctor, prohibits Jha from entering the premises of any Delhi University affiliated college during the suspension period. The decision comes nearly a month after the incident, which took place on October 16th, 2025.

According to the order, the suspension will take immediate effect. Jha has also been directed to submit a written apology to Prof. Kumar and an undertaking of good conduct. While her entry into DU-affiliated colleges is prohibited, she will be permitted to attend her academic classes and appear for examinations. The order mentions that her conduct will be reviewed by an Enquiry Committee after the two-month period before revoking the suspension. However, the initial inquiry panel recommended a three-month suspension period. A senior DU official said, 

She will remain suspended for two months and cannot enter any DU campus in her capacity as a DUSU office-bearer. She is permitted to attend only her academic classes.”

An inquiry committee was constituted after CCTV footage of Jha slapping Prof. Kumar inside the Principal’s Office of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar College surfaced. The incident occurred during talks between ABVP members and teachers regarding a physical attack on the college’s elected Student Union President. Prof. Kumar, who was the then acting convener of the college’s Disciplinary Committee, had been looking into the matter.

Prof. Kumar stated that a student affiliated with ABVP, who was under suspension, assaulted the elected president, a member of NSUI, in front of him during the oath-taking ceremony in the college that day. Following this, ABVP members including Jha came to the college. Prof. Kumar stated that he was asked to resign as convener, which he did. 

The incident sparked uproar on the ‘unacceptable’ breach of decorum. It particularly triggered condemnation from teachers’ groups, including DUTA (Delhi University Teachers’ Association) and DTF (Democratic Teachers’ Front), both of which demanded immediate action for what they termed a serious breach of institutional decorum.  Calling the episode “mobocracy and hooliganism,” the DTF warned that such unchecked behaviour could escalate violence across campuses. The Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar College Staff Association (BRACSA) also held a protest in October, calling for stringent disciplinary measures, which saw participation from DUTA office-bearers and others.

In a statement to the Hindustan Times, Jha said, “I regret the incident and apologise to the teachers’ community.” She claimed that Prof. Kumar had been “staring” and “smirking” at her, which she said prompted her reaction. “I felt angry and raised my hand,” she added. 

Some have criticised the punishment as greatly disproportionate to Jha’s actions. “This has confirmed the apprehensions held by most teachers: that the DU administration will ensure a safe passage for the culprit,” said Rudrashish Chakraborty, Associate Professor at Kirori Mal College and former DUTA Executive.

This travesty of justice has sent a message loud and clear that the teachers, students, and non-teaching staff of DU have no security in their workplace. The University administration has abandoned everyone in order to protect the goons of the ruling party,” he continued.

Dr. Mirthuraaj Dhusiya, an elected member of the Executive Council, echoed similar sentiments, stating: “The quantum of punishment does not seem to inspire confidence to act as a strong deterrent to prevent such incidents of physical assault against teachers in the future.”

Read Also: DU Staff Criticise Admin, Demand Expulsion of DUSU Activist Over Assault on Professor

Image Credits: @deepika.jhaa

Anjali Paruvu

[email protected]

 

We are slowly becoming children of fragmented intermediaries, the political nature of our feeling of “belonging” consequently revolutionising against the self. What is then the fate of the culturally displaced? 

To be so brave as to consider yourself to “belong to a city” is to rely on a notion whose existence oscillates between a spectrum of aggressive spiritual sentiment and almost complete non-existence. 

 

Cultural identities, after all, are themselves functions of constantly reforming institutions, in addition to the very unit of time. I do not generally endorse that the self be subject to the atrocities of socio-cultural servility, except in the case of “belonging”, which both demands it and, quite often, penetrates into the individual that asks for it . 

 

There have been times when I longed for any answer to the preliminary question that enquires after the place affiliated with the self, to a personal or ancestral memory of the lives that led up to ours. The tangibility of this feeling is, unfortunately, unavailable to those who have been taught to live on the margins of cultural plurality, suspended on a line that indulges in its normative nature and constantly tears us away from it at the same time.

 

I talk of such a paradox because there is no doubt that it is a widely experienced one; the very characteristic of life is such that it craves connection aggressively, and the reality of experiencing it is that it is almost never fulfilled. 

 

Delhi, as an example, may be considered as a refuge for many such seekers of connection. It rescues the ones stuck in the limbo of cultural overwhelm, or the lack thereof, and offers a new schema to which a sense of belonging can be associated. The subjectivity of this rarely derived relationship must not be forgotten, for there are any number of objects or places or people—your family, an old journal—that can act as its source.

 

We “belong to a city” the same way that lions and tigers identify their territories. The land we exist on is a stolen geographical unit which becomes “home” when we recognise the value of the experiences contained within it. 

 

For the perpetually displaced- culturally, linguistically, geographically, metaphysically- “to belong” is contingent upon a performative assimilation into localities, the ability to ignore the dissonance between inherited memory and the manner of present existence. This liminal experience is therefore, the phenomenological reality that inhabits multiple symbolic universes, without a complete citizenship in any. The cultural limbo that is thus born is not neutral, it’s a perpetual psychic effort to translate our own fragmented identities calibrated to a contextual actuality. 

 

The fear, in my opinion, is not that we may never exit this cultural limbo, but that the epistemic space to narrate ourselves without distortion is ultimately taken away. We ask, in this context, whether we—the ones who have lived with such disjunction—possess legibility in our complexity.

We call the act of belonging “political” because it is never a static achievement. For most, it is a demand to be seen in their own nuanced sense, as a legitimate node in the social fabric, complete with the complexity that is born of fragmentation.

Perhaps the solution is that the goal must shift from “belonging to a city” or to tangible entities, to something more achievable in the larger sense of multiplicity. The conventional relation is thus a gesture of yearning for solidarity—a radical act of hospitality that simultaneously indicates an exclusion of the culturally displaced.

We must, as a species, “belong”. The question remains what we decide to aim this relationship toward. The recognition of this fact is perhaps the ultimate liberator of those stuck in this ill-fated limbo.

Read Also: On Belonging

Image Source: Excerpt from “‘Are You American?’: The Question I Couldn’t Answer,” by Rumi Hara

Manya Marwah

[email protected] 

The White Rose Club, Gargi’s queer-straight alliance, celebrates pride through campus-wide march, flash mob and zine launch

The White Rose Club (WRC), Gargi College’s official queer-straight alliance operating under the Centre for Diversity and Inclusion, organised its annual Pride Parade on 29 October 2025. Established in 2017 and formally recognised in 2020, the WRC aims to make Gargi College a safe, inclusive, and informed environment for LGBTQIA+ students by fostering dialogue through its programs and initiatives.

The parade, held from 12:30 PM to 1:30 PM, began at the Arts Quad and moved across the Auditorium, Main Arch, and academic blocks of the South Campus College. The event witnessed enthusiastic participation by students, faculty, and allies. Slogans such as “Hey hey, ho ho, homophobia has to go!”, “We resist, we persist, we exist!” and “Desh ke rang anek hai, pride unme se ek hai” echoed through the halls, encapsulating the primary resolve for inclusivity and dignity for the LGBTQ + community..

A highlight of this year’s parade was an interactive flash mob by Team WRC, which drew widespread engagement. Additionally, the face and hand painting stall, a WRC tradition, remained one of the most popular attractions before and after the parade.

The White Rose Club also released its second zine, “What Queerness Looks Like in Gargi”, featuring contributions in the form of poems, illustrations, and personal reflections from students across the college. 

Reflecting on the event, Disha Barwal, the WRC convenor, shared with us, “..I felt just as electric and vibrant, if not more. It is an incredible feeling to see people from all corners of our college come together to celebrate this community. I wouldn’t change it for the world.” Anjum Kaushal, Design Head for WRC, added, “Attending my first pride parade made me feel a sense of belonging, and seeing others experience that now is truly phenomenal.”

Other members of the club spoke on what the parade meant for a queer student who has been isolated for much of their life: “Being queer as an Indian is quite isolating sometimes, and this parade is just one of WRC’s efforts to help the students feel like they belong here just as anyone else does. It’s showing up that matters, and WRC shows up each year.”

Read Also: Rainbows on Chhatra Marg: Fourth Campus Pride Parade Takes Place in Full Force

Image Credits : gargicollege.in

Anjali Paruvu

[email protected]

Delhi High Court questions delays in appeals challenging the order on disclosing Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Delhi University degree details, directing the university to respond within three weeks. It has listed the matter for hearing on January 16, 2026.

A Bench comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela directed Delhi University to submit its reply within three weeks to the applications explaining the delay in filing the appeals. The matter has been listed for the next hearing on January 16, 2026.

The appeals were filed by Right to Information (RTI) activist Neeraj, Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Sanjay Singh, and advocate Mohd Irshad. They challenged the August 25 order of a single judge, which had quashed a Central Information Commission (CIC) directive that required Delhi University to disclose details of Mr. Modi’s 1978 Bachelor of Arts degree.

During Wednesday’s proceedings, the petitioners’ counsel argued that the single judge’s order contained fundamental errors and required judicial reconsideration. However, the Bench noted the delay in filing the appeals and emphasized that the issue of condonation of delay must be addressed before proceeding with the case.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing Delhi University, was asked by the court to file objections to the applications seeking condonation of delay. “We need to condone the delay first. File your objections,” the Bench directed.

The controversy stems from a 2016 RTI application filed by activist Neeraj, seeking inspection of records of students who completed their B.A. degree in 1978—the year Prime Minister Modi is said to have graduated. The CIC had, on December 21, 2016, allowed the inspection of these records. However, the decision was later challenged by Delhi University.

On August 25, the single judge had ruled that merely holding public office did not make all aspects of an individual’s personal information subject to public disclosure. The order emphasized the right to privacy, stating that such information could not be demanded simply because the person occupied a high position.

The issue continues to attract public and political attention, as it sits at the intersection of transparency and privacy—testing the limits of the Right to Information Act in relation to public figures. The court’s next hearing in January 2026 is expected to determine whether the petitioners’ appeals will proceed on merit.

Read Also: Delay in Examination Form filling: students report Missing Enrolment Numbers and Subject-Selection Glitches

FeaturedImageSource:  The Tribune

Richa Choudhary

[email protected]