Tag

Slider

Browsing

A solidarity march demanding safer public spaces for women and gender minorities was held across South Delhi on September 25, with students from Delhi University colleges taking to the streets following the gang-rape of a 17-year-old girl in Astha Kunj Park. 

The march remained largely decentralised and student-led with no formal affiliation to any political party. Members of the Collective were, however, also seen participating in the protest. Coordination and communication were primarily carried out through multiple WhatsApp groups. 

Students from various Delhi University colleges, along with those from institutions like AIIMS and IIT Delhi, joined the demonstration. The march began near Gargi College and proceeded towards Kamala Nehru College, with protesters raising concerns over women’s safety, inadequate infrastructure and restrictions on women’s access to public spaces. Reports from the protest noted demands for better lighting, security infrastructure and accountability around areas frequently used by students. 

Hindustan Times spoke to a student and revealed how they were publicly recorded in a metro, raising questions around privacy and safety. The demonstration unfolded in multiple stages. Students first marched on the road before moving to DDA’s Arun Jaitley Park for a public meeting, where participants discussed the demands being raised by the protest. The gathering later resumed as a night march at around 7 pm, with students returning to the streets as an act of reclaiming public spaces after dark.

The protesters opposed measures that restrict women’s movement in the name of safety. A major point of contention was the reported move to restrict access to parks after sunset, which protesters argued places the responsibility for preventing sexual violence on women rather than addressing perpetrators, policing and inadequate public infrastructure. Moneycontrol reported that protesters also criticised restrictions on women’s access to parks and called for stronger institutional accountability.

The march also expanded the conversation beyond rape to everyday forms of gender-based harassment. Protesters raised concerns about stalking, inappropriate recording of women in public spaces and the lack of adequate lighting and security around college-adjacent areas. 

At the public meeting, participants released the “Hum Auratein Azaad Hai Declaration”, a ten-point charter outlining their demands. The declaration calls for street lighting in roads, parks and public spaces, particularly around universities, slums and industrial areas; improved public transportation, including more DTC and shuttle buses and metro passes for women; and functional public toilets and menstrual-health facilities for women and gender minorities.

Speaking to DU Beat, another student emphasised the need to build collective solidarity beyond Delhi University, arguing that the movement should extend to central universities like IITs and AIIMs across the country. “For collective solidarity, this cannot remain limited to Delhi University. Students from central universities across the country should be brought into the movement so that the demand for women’s safety and the right to public spaces becomes a nationwide struggle.”

Beyond immediate security measures, the declaration places women’s safety within wider questions of economic and social freedom. It calls for more hostels and scholarships for women students, greater opportunities for women in STEM and professional fields, equal pay, and investment in public infrastructure such as anganwadis, creches, maternity homes, community kitchens and laundries.

The charter also addresses the treatment of women care workers, calling for recognition and dignity for workers in anganwadis, sanitation, hospitals and domestic work. It further raises concerns over the treatment of sexual violence as a matter of community “izzat” and demands greater accountability for public officials accused of sexual harassment.

Similar marches are scheduled to happen across Delhi University colleges. The protest thus connected the immediate demand for safer streets with a broader demand for women’s freedom to occupy public spaces without restrictions. 

 

Read also: IPCW Announces Student Elections Following Earlier Refusal

Image Credits: Satakshi for DU Beat

 

Tarunima Tayal 

tarunimatayal@gmail.com

A gas cylinder leak reportedly caused a fire on the fourth floor of Gupta Niwas PG in Gautam Nagar, while a resident alleged fire safety lapses and the removal of videos.

A fire reportedly broke out on the fourth floor of Gupta Niwas paying guest (PG) accommodation in Gautam Nagar, Delhi, on 23 September, following a suspected gas cylinder leak.

According to a resident who spoke to DU Beat on condition of anonymity, the incident occurred between 9 and 10 am. The cause of the fire has not been officially confirmed, and it remains unclear whether anyone was injured. Workers may have been hurt, though this could not be independently verified.

There were allegedly no fire extinguishers near the cooking area, while the building reportedly lacks fire alarms and a proper fire exit. The only rear gate is also allegedly kept closed. It is unclear whether the police were called.

Videos of the fire were recorded by residents of a nearby PG accommodation. The footage was allegedly later removed, with people reportedly being asked to delete it, while burn marks in the affected area had already been painted over.

The warden reportedly did not mention the fire when asked about the incident, while parents of residents were said to have called the PG in large numbers afterwards. The resident expressed concern that the cylinder could have exploded and that the fire could have been far worse in a six-storey building, calling for basic safety measures to be put in place.

Two electrical faults were also reportedly noticed in the days preceding the fire. Burnt wires were allegedly spotted in electrical boards at around 11:45 pm on 21st September and fixed by 2 am. A similar incident reportedly occurred the following day.

At the time of publication, no statement from the PG management, the Delhi Fire Service or the police had been made available.

 

Image Caption: Gupta Niwas PG in Gautam Nagar in flames of the fire reported on 23 September.

Image Credits: Anonymous

Read Also: Gunshots Fired Near LSR Back Gate; Incident Linked to Astha Kunj Minor Assault Case

Vidhi Ramchandani

vidhirmn2006@gmail.com

The back gate area of Lady Shri Ram College For Women, DU, bustled with slogans of “Azaadi” on the evening of 23rd September, with hundreds of women joining the solidarity march that was organised to raise concerns about women’s safety following the alleged gang rape of a 17-year-old minor near Aastha Kunj earlier this week. 

Around 4PM, on the evening of 23rd September, hundreds of women students from various DU colleges like LSR and Gargi gathered at National Park, near the back gate of Lady Shri Ram College For Women, DU, to lead a solidarity march, raising their voices about concerns of women’s safety in the national capital of the country, especially in and around Delhi University colleges. 

Despite several media channels portraying this as a solidarity march organised and participated in only by LSR students, several students present at the march have denied such claims. 

“To clarify, this is not an LSR issue; this is an all-women, all-DU issue,” says a student present at the march. “When a curfew is established, it only stops women from going out; it doesn’t hinder the men from committing heinous crimes, like rape,” she further states.

Female students and faculty members from across DU Colleges join the solidarity march

The march was joined in by hundreds of women from multiple DU colleges, making it successful in raising collective concerns about inadequate CCTV surveillance and patrolling in the area, as students state that security concerns had persisted long before the recent incident. Demanding the same, chants of “Azaadi” and “Inquilab Zindabaad” filled the premises of National Park and Moolchand. 

Police cars, along with abundant police forces, covered the entire area, ensuring the march remained peaceful and didn’t turn into a public disruption. However, these same police forces were also seen to stop for deliberations and negotiations with the student body regarding which path the march should take or till where they should be allowed to move forward. Despite this, the march did not come to a halt for once.

Police manned with guns observed patrolling the solidarity march

This all-women’s march saw students raising slogans and carrying posters highlighting the need for better security infrastructure around the college and its adjoining areas, as yet another rape incident brought the longstanding demand for women’s safety into focus. The posters that were carried by the students highlighted slogans like, “Moral policing women will not stop rape” and “A woman’s body isn’t a battleground for your power.” 

This march is an attempt to reclaim the spaces that are overpowered by men and patriarchal people who have normalised violence against women,”

says a faculty member from LSR who also actively took part in the march.  

The march, upon reaching the Pink Booth, which was inaugurated earlier this year in hopes of securing safety for women travelling by the roads nearby leading to Moolchand Metro Station, was met with a long-lasting discussion going back and forth between a few people from the march and the police forces. The spirit of the march was intact, however, as most of the students were seen to sit down, continuing with their loud, energetic chants. 

The Pink Booth, though established to make women feel safer, has received heavy scrutiny from students of nearby colleges, especially LSR, ever since its establishment. The concern of the booth being mostly empty has remained a recurring complaint. 

The solidarity march however, wasn’t limited just to the students of the nearby colleges. Student organisations like SFI and AISA also joined the march, while parties like ABVP were spotted at the Amar Colony Police Station spreading pamphlets to the police in an attempt to spread awareness.

Line of students spotted demanding basic security and raising concern for women’s safety

This inciting incident comes within days of sexual violence in Bihar’s Jamui district, where two juveniles were hounded by a group of masked men who tried to abduct and molest the girl on camera. NCRB data shows increasing incidents of violence against women, with a crime reported every 71 seconds. 

Less than a third of cases reported result in convictions. Despite claims of “Encounter Justice” by many Chief Ministers from the BJP, including Adityanath (UP), Hemanta (Assam), Samrat Chaudhary (Bihar) and Suvendhu Adhikari (WB)—the police being ordered to shoot perpetrators before proving their guilt in courts—the rising numbers show that this has not stopped crimes against women. In fact, the majority of reported crimes are by people known to the survivor. The current regime has also famously celebrated powerful men involved in sexual violence, from Brijbhushan Singh to rapists at Kathua – Unnao – Hathras and IIT BHU, even garlanding Bilkis Bano’s rapists. 

The institutional shortcomings are starkly evident in the recurring campus violence and administrative failures in DU. The reinstatement of a professor found guilty of sexual harassment at Ramjas College in 2025, the routine normalization of sexual harassment during college fests at women’s colleges, systemic harassment allegations at Bharati College in 2018, and the aggressive hooliganism and harassment targeting women during DUSU elections reiterate how unsafe university spaces remain for women and gender minorities.

As one of the posters said, “It’s not my fault I crave the night air; it’s your fault you crave taking it away from me.”

This march is not new, nor are the crimes against women. Today, the students of a central university do not feel safe around their own campus; tomorrow, we will hear headlines talking about another case where women do not feel safe inside the four walls of their own house. The perpetual oppression and violence against women have been continuing for centuries, yet the system fails them time and again, compelling them to take to the streets and reclaim spaces that were never supposed to be bound by any ownership. 

 

Chandrani 

chandrani.m495@gmail.com

 

Image Credits: Nibedita & Sheetal for DU Beat

Read Also: Gunshots Fired Near LSR Back Gate; Incident Linked to Astha Kunj Minor Assault Case

The Hindu College Staff Association and students have been holding a dharna since 14th September 2026, demanding accountability from the college administration over alleged procedural violations in supernumerary admissions and a broader pattern of governance concerns. 

DU Beat warmly acknowledges Scribe, the Literary Society of Hindu College, whose detailed documentation of the ongoing issue has been an invaluable reference in the reporting of this piece. 

Since 14 September 2026, the Hindu College Staff Association (HCSA) and students have been sitting on a dharna on campus. The protest was triggered by alleged procedural violations in the supernumerary quota admission process in August. The association had passed a unanimous vote of No Confidence against Principal Prof. Anju Shrivastava, and in response, the Governing Body issued show-cause notices to three faculty members, including the HCSA President, Secretary and a senior faculty member. The HCSA’s demands include the withdrawal of these notices, accountability for the admissions irregularities, and adherence to statutory governance norms by the administration.

In supernumerary admissions through ECA and sports, the Bulletin of Information states that no single undergraduate programme must have more than 20% of the total supernumerary seats. However, according to Scribe, the Literary Society of Hindu College’s Substack, two courses, B.A. (Honours) Political Science and B.Com (Honours), exceeded the 20% statutory cap for a single course. The society also claims that once the TICs identified the aberration, there were procedural delays from both the Principal and the DU Dean of Admissions in rectifying the issue. The issue was credited to an algorithmic error, which the students claim is mathematically unfeasible. This has also raised questions amongst students as to whether similar irregularities may have occurred previously without detection.

On the final day of the college verification round for admissions, 14 August 2026, the Principal called for an urgent Council Meeting with the Staff Council Secretary, Dr Chandrachur Singh. The Staff Council Secretary proposed convening the next day, adducing statutes demanding a 24-hour formal notice before a meeting. Since the portal closed at 5 pm that day, the list was finalised in breach of the 20% limit. At approximately 7 pm on 14th August, a Google Meet link was circulated on the HCSA WhatsApp group by a faculty member without administrative standing, with around 50 faculty members contacted via private calls. The HCSA Secretary and Convener of Academic Affairs were reportedly not included. The consensus arrived at through this meeting was allegedly used to clear the disputed admission list. 

On 18th August 2026, the HCSA convened a general body meeting attended by 80 to 85 members, representing permanent faculty across departments. The meeting concluded with a unanimous vote of no confidence against Principal Prof. Anju Shrivastava. Copies were submitted to the Vice-Chancellor, the Dean of Colleges, and Governing Body Chairman Mr T.C.A. Rangachari.

Chairman Rangachari allegedly publicly stated that he does not recognise the HCSA, a body that has existed for over seventy years. Show-cause notices were subsequently issued to three faculty members, including HCSA President Dr Ratan Lal, Secretary Dr Shankar Kumar, and senior faculty member Dr P.K. Vijayan, for alleged code of conduct violations.

The dharna has witnessed widespread participation, but the students have expressed feeling intimidated by the administration, with non-teaching staff holding up cameras in meetings meant for a dialogue between the Principal and the students. 

“The dharna is going pretty strong, with many students coming up every day to support the cause. However, there seems to be a division in interest towards the protest, with many departments boycotting it. There have been alleged calls from the Administration to the parents of the students who are participating in the protest. There have been alleged claims that the professors of some departments are telling students not to take part in it. Nevertheless, the protest has brought forward several important issues, especially the tyrannical behaviour of the administration and the havoc it creates in students’ lives, and it indeed needs to be paid attention to,” a second-year student at Hindu College told DU Beat. 

The admissions controversy has brought to the surface a longer-running dispute over governance at Hindu College. Under DU’s Ordinance XVIII, Clause 6(3), the Principal is required to function as “Principal-in-Council” on matters that fall within the Staff Council’s domain; meaning executive decisions on such matters cannot be taken unilaterally. Clause 6(e) of the same ordinance further mandates that the Principal implement all decisions of the Staff Council. According to the HCSA, these provisions have been routinely disregarded. The Staff Council Secretary has, by the association’s account, written over 100 letters to the Principal requesting compliance with statutory requirements, including the convening of mandatory semester meetings and the maintenance of signed minutes on record. The association alleges that these communications have gone largely unacknowledged.

The midnight Google Meet of 14th August is cited by the HCSA as emblematic of this pattern: a meeting convened without statutory notice, bypassing the elected Secretary and Convener of Academic Affairs, and used to generate consent for a decision that the faculty body had not formally deliberated upon.

Students have voiced concerns about the campus environment alongside the faculty’s governance grievances. Annual fees and on-campus hostel charges, according to students, exceed what comparable private paying guest accommodations in the area cost.

Beyond fees, students allege a pattern of administrative overreach into routine aspects of campus life. Women’s washrooms are reportedly locked at 4:00 pm, despite classes running until 4:50 pm. Security personnel allegedly clear the lawns and library at the same hour, effectively restricting student access to common spaces before the academic day has ended.

More seriously, some faculty members have alleged that students have been deployed inside classrooms to covertly record lectures delivered by faculty members associated with the protest, including Dr Ratan Lal and Dr Shankar. The HCSA has described this as an attempt to surveil and intimidate dissenting voices within the institution. 

 

Read Also: DUTA Takes Demands to LG, Classes Suspended Across 12 DU Colleges 

Image Source: Scribe, the Literary Society of Hindu College 

 

Rishika Jain

rishikajain0811@gmail.com 

DUTA will hold a Justice March on September 23 over teaching vacancies and the regularisation of long-serving ad-hoc faculty across 12 Delhi government-funded DU colleges.

Classes across 12 Delhi University colleges are expected to be suspended after 10 am on Wednesday, September 23, as the Delhi University Teachers’ Association (DUTA) will hold a Justice March over the approval of teaching positions and the regularisation of long-serving temporary and ad-hoc faculty.

The march will begin at 10.30 am from Gate No. 1 of the University’s Vice-Chancellor’s Office and proceed towards the Lieutenant Governor’s House. DUTA plans to submit a petition to the Lieutenant Governor, taking its demands beyond the University campus and directly to the Delhi administration.

The association is demanding approval for teaching positions in the 12 Delhi government-funded colleges, along with the immediate initiation of the regularisation and absorption process for teachers who have served on temporary or ad hoc appointments for several years. According to DUTA, the vacancies and continued reliance on temporary appointments have remained a concern for the functioning of these colleges and their teaching staff. In May this year, DUTA raised similar concerns over delays in filling teaching and non-teaching positions across the 12 colleges.

The regularisation of ad hoc faculty has also previously been before the Delhi High Court. In July 2025, the Court ruled in favour of two ad-hoc Assistant Professors seeking regularisation, citing their prolonged service and the circumstances surrounding their appointments. The ruling forms part of the broader legal context around the employment status of teachers who have served for extended periods on temporary appointments.

With DUTA taking its demands to the LG House, Wednesday’s Justice March is set to bring renewed attention to the availability of teaching positions in the 12 colleges and the continued presence of temporary and ad-hoc faculty. 

Ahana Dey

ahanagangulydey@gmail.com

Image Source: India Today.com 

Read Also: Delhi Police and Housing Association Flag 56 PGs in North Campus After Satya Niketan Collapse

Delhi Housing Association and Police flag and summon 56 PG owners in North Campus along with documents for security risks and safety hazards.

Post the collapse in Satya Niketan, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) has been proactive in striking out strict regulations for PGs and other forms of housing accommodations. Delhi Police have served notices to at least 56 paying guest (PG) accommodations in Kamla Nagar, Malka Ganj, and Bungalow Road, directing operators to submit building, fire, and safety records as part of an audit following the Satya Niketan building collapse. 

These neighbourhoods are among the most populous student accommodation hubs near the north campus area in North Delhi. These notices were issued by the Roop Nagar Police Station, seeking sanctioned building plans and occupancy records. 

According to police officers, this procedure is part of a wider exercise to identify unauthorised constructions, overcrowding and serious safety lapses across these student neighbourhoods. The action follows the collapse of a five-storey PG in Satya Niketan on September 6 that killed seven people, including five DU students. 

According to a notice issued by the Station House Officer accessed by The Tribune, PG operators and owners have been asked to summon and present ownership and development records of their accommodations and valid clearances from civic agencies. These include the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), Delhi Development Authority (DDA), Delhi Fire Service and Delhi Police. 

The notices further seek details of fire-safety arrangements, including fire-safety certificates, firefighting equipment, emergency exits, staircases and escape routes. Under structural and fire safety requirements, police have sought a “valid fire safety certificate/fire NOC”, along with the “sanctioned building plan”, “site/floor plan” and “occupancy/completion certificate”. Operators have also been asked to submit the “latest structural safety/stability certificate, ALL WHEREVER APPLICABLE”. 

Currently, the Delhi Police are reviewing and flagging unauthorised modifications and unchecked expansions in student living areas. The notice supports the permission for “any additional floor, basement, mezzanine, room, terrace or other portion being used for accommodation or any other commercial activity”. 

For women’s safety, PG owners housing female students in North Campus have been asked to provide details of female caretakers. Where no female warden or caretaker is deployed, the notice requires owners or managers to submit a written declaration identifying the person responsible for safety, assistance and emergency response during each shift. The audit also covers security arrangements, with owners asked to provide details of CCTV cameras and security guards, as well as a “self-attested Xerox copy of the complete Visitor Register for the preceding 15 days”. 

As per the notice, Delhi Police has warned that failure to comply with the current conditions could lead to seizure, and civic agencies might seal the accommodations instantly. A police officer familiar with the exercise claimed that a large majority of PG operators in the area lacked the required paperwork.

“About 95% of them do not have the required documents or are not compliant with safety norms. We are going case by case and deciding the course of action.”

The police exercise has carried out a separate pan-Delhi survey by the MCD. The civic body identified 52 dilapidated buildings operating as PGs on the first day of its survey and has so far identified 1,120 PG units housing 20,481 people. 

The survey and flagging exercise being undertaken by the housing and security departments of Delhi illustrates the grave underdevelopment and lack of infrastructural wellness in student accommodations across the whole city. Thousands of students live with these fatal security risks every day. With the measures being taken by officials and the government’s promise to create accommodations for 10000 students of Delhi University, students and their potential may finally be relieved. 

Read Also: Why Don’t the Students Show Up to Vote in the DUSU Elections? – DU Beat – Delhi University’s Independent Student Newspaper

Image Credits: PTI

Rajarshi Ghosh

rajarshi.817@gmail.com 

A five-storey PG, accommodating at least 50 students, collapsed in Satya Niketan on 6th September 2026. A cascade of arrests, demolitions, judicial proceedings, and institutional reckoning over the safety of student housing across the capital follows, with at least 7 people dead. 

At around 1:30 pm on Sunday, 6th September 2026, a five-storey building at Property No. P-14, Satya Niketan, South-West Delhi collapsed. The building, operating as a boys’ accommodation under the name “Hostel Daze”, measured approximately 55 square yards and comprised a basement and four floors above ground level. Preliminary material placed before the Supreme Court indicates that construction-related work was being carried out in or around the basement at the time of the collapse, and reports of waterlogging in the basement had emerged immediately before the incident. Seven people died, and at least twelve were rescued and taken to hospital, including the AIIMS Trauma Centre and Safdarjung Hospital. AIIMS confirmed that of the ten patients received at the JPN Trauma Centre, four were dead on arrival, and one who was in a critical state later succumbed to injuries.

The Delhi Police registered an FIR at the South Campus Police Station under Sections 105, 290, and 125 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The building’s owner, 81-year-old Hariram Gupta, along with his 75-year-old wife, Urmila Gupta, is under judicial custody. Their son, Mahesh Gupta, is under police custody. Five South Zone officers, including a Deputy Commissioner and four structural engineers, were suspended for negligence in oversight.

The Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad held demonstrations outside MCD headquarters demanding mandatory structural safety audits for all student accommodations. Some students and family members alleged that the death toll had been underreported, though authorities did not publicly address this claim.

Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said the government was working to draft a policy requiring buildings of a certain age to submit a structural audit report certifying their safety. Delhi Mayor Pravesh Wahi described the collapse as appearing, prima facie, to be an accident linked to negligence and likely substandard construction materials.

A city-wide order was also issued to seal unauthorised structures exceeding four storeys. Across Delhi, a crackdown followed: 24 properties were demolished and seven sealed as part of an MCD enforcement drive.

The matter reached the Supreme Court on 8th September. A bench of Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Justice R. Mahadevan took up the case after Senior Advocate Ajit Kumar Sinha, Amicus Curiae in an ongoing matter concerning building bye-law violations across the country, sought an early hearing. Sinha’s status report noted that Satya Niketan had not been covered by the Supreme Court’s earlier inspection exercise. Sinha proposed extending the inspection exercise to PG accommodations, private hostels, and student housing establishments across Delhi, covering sanctioned building plans, basement alterations, fire-safety compliance, and structural safety. The Court indicated it may transfer to itself the PIL pending before the Delhi High Court, noting that the issues overlapped with its ongoing pan-India monitoring of building violations.

Separately, the National Human Rights Commission directed authorities to ensure adequate hostel facilities for Delhi University students in light of the incident, underscoring the wider concern that insufficient university-run accommodation pushes students towards unregulated private PGs.

Image Caption: The site of the Satya Niketan building collapse

Image Credit: Shashi Shekhar Kashyap (sourced from The Hindu)

Read Also: ABVP Protest Over Satya Niketan Collapse Turns Violent at MCD Headquarters 

Rishika Jain
rishikajain0811@gmail.com

“We are less bored than our ancestors were, but we are more afraid of boredom.”  ~Bertrand Russell

When was the last time you were truly bored?

Not bored for the three seconds it takes for a video to load, or bored enough to complain before opening Instagram. I mean the kind of boredom where there is genuinely nothing to do. No music playing, no conversation to have, no notifications to check, no screen to scroll through. Just time. For many of us, that kind of boredom has become almost unfamiliar.

The moment there is a gap in our day, we fill it. We scroll while waiting for class, put on music while travelling, watch something while eating, and reach for our phones when a conversation goes quiet. Even sleep has become something that needs background noise. Silence, once something we simply lived with, has become something we are quick to fill. But why?

The usual answer is that technology has shortened our attention spans. Our phones constantly offer us something new, and we have become accustomed to it. But that only explains how we escape boredom, not why we are so desperate to escape it.

We have become accustomed to filling every empty moment, often without questioning why. Perhaps the more interesting question is not why we get bored, but why being left alone with our thoughts can feel so uncomfortable.

 

The objective was never really to watch something. It was to avoid the feeling of having nothing to watch. But what exactly are we trying to escape when we run from boredom?

 

Boredom creates an unusual kind of empty space. Without something external demanding our attention, our own thoughts become harder to ignore. An argument with a friend, a pending assignment that you haven’t started working on, loneliness, uncertainty about the future, or maybe an embarrassing incident– basically, everything we regard as ‘overthinking’.

 

A 2024 study by Katy Y. Y. Tam and Michael Inzlicht revisits this paradox that despite having almost unlimited access to entertainment, people may actually be experiencing more boredom. According to the study, our attempts to escape boredom through digital media may sometimes be making it worse.

Across seven experiments involving 1,223 participants, Tam and Inzlicht found that boredom encouraged people to switch between videos and fast-forward through content. Participants expected this constant switching to make them less bored. Instead, switching often increased boredom while reducing attention, satisfaction and the sense that the content was meaningful.

We scroll because we are bored, but the constant search for something more interesting may be making it harder to become interested in anything at all. And now, we are stuck in a vicious cycle.

This is also evident in the way we consume short-form content. A video takes a few seconds too long to get to the point, so we swipe. The next one is not interesting enough, so we swipe again. Soon, we have moved through twenty pieces of content without really paying attention to any of them.

This does not mean that every person who checks their phone is secretly avoiding their feelings. Nor is distraction inherently harmful. Sometimes we simply want entertainment. But when every moment of silence is immediately filled, we lose the opportunity to find out what happens when we do not fill it.

A 2014 study published in Science explored this discomfort directly. Participants were asked to sit alone in a room for between 6 and 15 minutes with nothing to do except think. The researchers found that many participants struggled with the experience. In one experiment, some even chose to give themselves mild electric shocks rather than remain alone with their thoughts. The findings have since been debated and should not be reduced to the claim that people universally hate their own thoughts, but the study nevertheless demonstrated how difficult unstructured time can be for some people.There is, however, another side to boredom.

When there is nothing immediately demanding our attention, the mind can wander. In a 2014 study, psychologists Sandi Mann and Rebekah Cadman found that participants who completed boring activities subsequently performed better on certain creative tasks. The researchers suggested that daydreaming could partly explain the relationship between boredom and creativity.

Ironically, this is where boredom becomes interesting. It gives us time to observe.

We notice things differently when we are not constantly being given something to look at. A delayed Metro can become an opportunity to notice the people around us. A walk without headphones can make us aware of the sounds of the street. Sitting in a café without immediately reaching for our phones can make us notice the conversations happening around us.

Our phones have trained us to expect constant novelty. The next image is one swipe away. The next song is one tap away. The next video begins before we have even decided whether we want it. Digital media can divide attention and encourage us to keep searching for something more stimulating rather than remaining with what is already in front of us. Tam and Inzlicht’s broader 2024 review argues that digital media may contribute to boredom through divided attention, heightened expectations for stimulation and ineffective attempts to cope with boredom.

We often speak about the need to “pay attention” to art as though attention were simply a switch we could turn on. But attention is also a habit. The ability to notice a small detail in a painting, sit through a long scene or listen to someone without checking a notification depends, in part, on our willingness to stay when there is no immediate reward. A painting does not change every few seconds. A poem may require more than one reading. A slow film may ask us to wait before it gives us anything. A theatre performance demands that we sit in one place and remain present. Even a museum asks something increasingly difficult of us– to stand still and look.

The answer is not to romanticise boredom or declare phones the enemy or move away to the mountains and adopt the life of a monk. Digital entertainment can give us pleasure, connection and rest. The problem is the assumption that every empty moment needs to be filled.

Because some things can only be noticed when we stop looking for the next thing. Boredom is not the absence of attention.Maybe it is where attention begins.

And the next time the Metro is five minutes late, perhaps we could let those five minutes remain empty.

Not because there is nothing to do, but because there might finally be something to see.

Image Credits: Antonio Sortino & Alice Lagarde

 

Aarushi Chaubey

chaarushi2001@gmail.com

 

DU partners with AMD to upskill 10,000 students in AI with hands-on training, open-source tools, cloud GPU credits, and industry-ready learning.  

The University of Delhi has partnered with Chipmaker AMD (Advanced Micro Devices) to equip students with industry-relevant artificial intelligence (AI) skills. The two organisations signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) on Thursday to bring AMD’s AI Engage Developer Program to the university.

Under the partnership, students and faculty will gain hands-on access to AMD’s open-source ROCm™ AI software platform, AI learning resources, technical workshops, and GPU cloud credits. The programme also includes access to cloud-based GPU infrastructure, enabling participants to experiment, conduct research, and build real-world AI applications. The initiative aims to train up to 10,000 students within the next year, helping them move beyond theoretical learning to designing, testing, and deploying AI solutions using industry-grade tools.

“India has the talent and the ambition to lead the next wave of AI innovation. The opportunity now is to give students early access to the platforms and tools that power real-world AI development. Through our collaboration with the University of Delhi, we are helping students move from learning AI concepts to building AI solutions,” said Jaya Jagadish, Country Head and Senior Vice President, AMD India.

According to DU, the collaboration is designed to strengthen India’s AI talent pipeline by integrating practical AI education into academic programmes. Alongside classroom learning, students will gain access to modern AI computing platforms and open-source development tools, bridging the gap between academia and industry.

Yogesh Singh, Vice-Chancellor of the University of Delhi, said, “

We are proud to partner with AMD in advancing AI education and innovation in India. This collaboration reflects a growing industry focus on preparing graduates with practical AI skills that extend beyond classroom learning. By combining academic learning with access to modern AI computing platforms, AMD and Delhi University will help create a stronger pipeline of AI developers and researchers to support India’s expanding digital economy.

The initiative forms part of AMD’s broader strategy to strengthen India’s AI ecosystem through academic collaborations, developer enablement, and open AI innovation, while also supporting the country’s growing demand for skilled AI and semiconductor talent.

 

Kaustubh Dwivedi

Dwivedikaustubh4@gmail.com

Image Source – EnterpriseAI.com 

Read Also: Delhi University Opens CES 2026 Applications for Odd Semester 

Delhi University has opened applications for its Competence Enhancement Scheme (CES) for the 2026 odd semester, allowing candidates to enroll in individual papers offered by university departments and colleges, per the official CES portal.

The University of Delhi opened applications for its Competence Enhancement Scheme (CES) for the 2026 odd semester on September 2, allowing candidates to register for individual papers offered by university departments and colleges without enrolling in a full degree programme, according to the official CES portal.

According to the portal, an applicant may register for a maximum of two papers or eight credits in a semester, whichever is reached earlier, and must pay a fee of Rs 6,000 per paper once the application is verified. Working professionals are required to upload a No-Objection Certificate (NOC) from their employer, while candidates already enrolled in a regular DU programme are not eligible to apply. Applicants are directed to consult the DU Syllabi portal to identify the programme, semester, course name, course code, and credits before submitting their form for departmental scrutiny.

Once a form is verified, candidates must pay the course fee through DU’s Miscellaneous Fee payment system and submit a copy of the receipt to the concerned office to confirm admission. Seats allotted under CES are treated as supernumerary and do not affect the intake of regular students, with selection dependent on availability in the relevant department or college.

CES was rolled out in DU’s centenary year in line with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, with the Institute of Lifelong Learning (ILLL) serving as the nodal agency for the scheme. The ILLL describes its mandate as supporting learners for whom education is “neither age-bound nor classroom-bound.”

 

Image Credits: thecsrjournal.in

Read Also: Delhi HC issues notice on PIL seeking 50% Women’s Reservation in DUSU Polls

Vidhi Ramchandani

vidhirmn2006@gmail.com