Tag

dusu

Browsing

The Delhi HC has prohibited victory processions after the DUSU election results, citing security and order concerns.

On Wednesday, 17th September, the Delhi High Court ruled that no victory processions shall be carried out in the capital by candidates or their supporters post the result declaration of Delhi University Students’ Unions (DUSU) elections on Friday, 19th September. This has come from the bench comprising Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, in response to Advocate Prashant Manchanda’s plea, concerning widespread violations of Lyngdoh Committee norms and other poll codes. The latter had submitted photographs showing alleged violations being carried out by candidates. As per Law Beat and The Indian Express, it involved large-scale campaigning using money and muscle power,  traffic breaches and damage to public property. According to The Hindustan Times, the High Court has also warned:

We’re not interfering with elections, but if the elections do not happen in a satisfactory, peaceful and orderly manner, if your reports are not positive, counting may take place, but we will stop functioning of the office bearers of the election.

The Court took notice of the fact that once the counting concludes, victory processions taken out by the winning candidates and their supporters become difficult for the police and university authorities to manage. Following this, the Court has not only prohibited these victory processions in and around the university campuses and hostels, but has also directed the Delhi Police, the university administration and the local civil administration to take all necessary measures to ensure that no untoward incidents occur during the polling process or at any time before or after it. It further instructed that no violations of regulatory norms be allowed.

According to The Hindustan Times, around 2.8 lakh students cast their votes today. More than 600 police personnel were deployed to ensure a smooth voting process, including 160 equipped with body cameras. The Supreme Court-appointed Lyngdoh Committee, which delineates mandatory rules to ensure free, fair and orderly DUSU elections, has capped the election expenditure of each candidate at Rs 5,000, and has allowed only handmade posters, that too at specified locations and in limited numbers. However, violations in the form of large convoys of luxury cars, excessive use of graffiti and banners and traffic disruptions necessitating road detours are visible. The HC ruling prohibiting celebratory marches is aimed at maintaining peace and order during elections.

Read Also: From Lecture Halls to Delhi High Court: DU’s Bribery Scandal Ends in Justice

Image Caption: Delhi HC prohibits victory processions after DUSU election results

 

Image Source: The Hindustan Times

 

Nasheta Zaidi

 

zaidinasheta @gmail.com

 

Congress leader Sachin Pilot campaigns at Delhi University on behalf of NSUI ahead of DUSU 2025 polls, backing Joslyn Nandita Choudhary and team as students debate for change against the ABVP dominance.

 

Congress General Secretary Sachin Pilot on Monday visited Delhi University’s North Campus, meeting students and expressing confidence that the National Students’ Union of India, or NSUI will sweep the upcoming Delhi University Students’ Union (DUSU) elections.

During his visit, Pilot, joined by the NSUI National President Varun Choudhary, and Delhi Congress Chief Devender Yadav, interacted with students at Miranda House, Campus Law Centre, and Hindu College. Outside Hindu College, tensions briefly flared when supporters of the NSUI and the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) came face-to-face, shouting slogans before security personnel intervened to restore order.

Pilot said, 

Delhi University is one of the most important universities of our country. All four NSUI candidates will surely win with the support and trust of students,” 

He asserted that students were eager for change, citing the growing discontent with both the Union and State Governments. “The students believe in our ideology and vision, which will be reflected in the results,” he added.

The visit was part of a larger outreach programme by NSUI to highlight student-centric issues such as campus facilities, hostels, and academic reforms. According to an official statement, the campaign is aimed at mobilising support across colleges and presenting a credible alternative to the ABVP, which has traditionally dominated student politics at DU.

This year’s NSUI panel features Joslyn Nandita Choudhary, a 23-year-old postgraduate student of Buddhist Studies, as the Presidential candidate. Choudhary is the first woman in 17 years to contest for the top post. The panel also includes Rahul Jhansla for vice president, Kabir for secretary, and Lav Kush Badhana for joint secretary. Party leaders described the line-up as a “blend of fresh faces and representative voices.”

The DUSU polls for the 2025–26 academic session are scheduled for September 18, with counting to be held the next day. The elections are seen as a key barometer of student sentiment and often carry symbolic weight in national politics.

In last year’s elections, the NSUI staged a notable comeback after a seven-year gap, winning the President and Joint Secretary posts. The ABVP, affiliated with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, managed to secure the vice president’s position and retained the secretary’s post. The contest this year is expected to be closely fought, with both outfits banking on strong mobilisation drives across the campus.

As the campaign heats up, Delhi University once again finds itself at the centre of high-energy student politics, with national parties keenly watching the outcome.

Read Also – Campus Promises: ABVP, NSUI, and SFI–AISA Manifestos 2025

 

Featured Image Source – Free Press Journal

 

Richa Choudhary

[email protected]

 

DU Beat in conversation with Sohan Yadav, contesting for the post of Vice President for Delhi University Students Union (DUSU) 2025, from the Students’ Federation of India (SFI), as a part of the AISA-SFI panel. This interview was originally taken in Hindi and has been translated into English.

S: What, according to you, is the biggest challenge that university students face, and how would you work on improving it?

S: There are three to four very common but major issues. Lack of Hostels and privacy are huge issues. Quality food is not available in most colleges, and colleges where quality food is available offer it at such a high price point that it is not affordable for many. At SFI, we believe that just like we succeeded in curbing the issue of fee hikes at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), as a part of DUSU, we will do the same at Delhi University. We will provide metro passes to students, just as we have done at Hyderabad University. Additionally, we want there to be quality and affordable food at all colleges. Another huge issue is the degrading state of academics in the university. Our demands also include making the SEC and VAC papers completely additional and optional to allow students to focus on their main areas of interest.

S: . What are some key points within your election manifesto?

S: Right. So our first point is the democratisation of the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) in all colleges, which is not the case in many colleges. The second point is the issue of hostels. Our third pointer is the issue of fee hikes. Our fifth pointer is about ensuring the functioning of a quality and affordable canteen in every college, and our sixth is the demand for concessional metro passes for students. Lastly, our seventh point is to increase student safety in and around campus spaces – we observe students being murdered and committing suicides around us, and we would like to take steps to curb this.  Another demand that is closely tied to this is the creation of quality medical facilities within colleges. In many colleges, while a medical room exists, psychiatrists, nurses, doctors and other professionals are not present in those rooms. Especially in today’s times, where so many students are suffering from mental health issues, it is necessary to ensure the presence of mental health professionals within the medical room of each college.

S: With increasing financial pressure on students, what steps would you advocate for better affordability?

S: See, there is only one solution to this. Firstly, the fee hikes that we face have already separated the oppressed classes and alienated them. When I used to study at Zakir Hussain College, every year, I used to fill the fees for at least six students by sourcing and collecting funds through my organisation. I myself have worked part-time jobs to fill the fees for two semesters after the fee hikes. So I fully understand the ripple effect of issues created after the fee hikes. So our main demand is putting a complete stop to fee hikes while simultaneously creating new policies and systems of support to help students from oppressed backgrounds who may not be able to pay their fees due to multiple reasons.

S: With increasing financial pressure on students, what steps would you advocate for better affordability?

S: Basic needs and amenities need to be targeted first. For instance, if a student is able to get affordable hostels and accommodation, costs will be reduced there; if they get concessional metro passes, travel costs will also be reduced; if they can get affordable food within their canteens, costs will also be reduced for food. So our continuous attempt after coming into DUSU will be the creation of a university where students get affordable travel, affordable food, affordable accommodation and affordable education to decrease financial burdens on students. It is our dream to create such a university space, just as we have done in JNU over the years.

S: What specific, achievable changes can you realistically deliver within your one-year term if elected, and how will you show that progress to students?

S: Right, so firstly, one of our immediate steps is to curb a very common issue, which is the lack of clean and functioning water coolers in colleges. This issue has not been settled until now, since coolers in many colleges stop working after every two months. We will also work towards maintaining quality and affordable food in every college canteen. Lastly, South Campus students have been facing this issue for a long time. The administration does not sit in the South Campus building, and as a result, they have to come to North Campus for many administrative issues. We will ensure that an administrative body also sits in the South Campus building, and lastly, we strongly believe that “keval chunaavi vaasi na chalein” (only vote-based actions should not prevail), so the special U buses should run even after the elections, and I will ensure that that happens.

Read Also: Interview with Anjali | AISA Candidate | DUSU Elections 2025

Image Credits: DU Beat

Interview by Sakshi Singh
[email protected]

 

DU Beat in conversation with Anjali, contesting for the post of President for Delhi University Students Union (DUSU) 2025, from the All India Students’ Association (AISA), as a part of the AISA-SFI panel. This interview was originally taken in Hindi and has been translated into English.

S: What, according to you, is the biggest challenge that university students face, and how would you work on improving it?

A: The biggest challenge is that there is a lack of trust between the students’ union and the student body as a collective. Students tend to think that student politics is limited to what they see around them, where being a part of the union is merely a launching pad for some and where hooliganism and muscle power dominate the scene. Access to quality facilities is also a huge issue—students spend more time studying VAC/SEC courses like Swach Bharat and Yoga, as opposed to their course of interest; the entire semester is taken up by multiple assessments under the IA/CA model, and with almost 45 marks being solely in the hands of the faculty, the democratic nature of the classroom is slowly eroding. Therefore, there is hooliganism on one hand and the eroding nature of education on the other, while the students suffer in the middle. 

S: What are some key points within your election manifesto?

A: Every student comes here with the aspiration of building a future for themselves, irrespective of their socio-economic background. Our first and foremost demand is access to quality education. Students come to Delhi University with the aim of studying their disciplines of choice, like History, English, Political Science, Economics etc in depth, but under NEP, in the name of “value addition” and “skill enhancement”, they are being made to study courses like The Art of Being Happy, Fit India, Yoga, etc., which are all subjects that they could have easily studied on YouTube, without coming into a “premier institution” like Delhi University. Moreover, issues like the surveillance of teachers within academic spaces and discrimination in the classroom further raise a huge question on the accessibility, affordability and quality of education in the university.

In the same Delhi University that was historically known for its diverse social fabric and witnessed students coming from a variety of backgrounds, the UGC (University Grants Commission) has been replaced by HEFA (Higher Education Financing Agency), which has led to a 20-25 per cent fee hike every semester. These hikes seem to say, “Gareeb ghar ki aulad ho? Tumhare maa-baap rickshaw chalate hai, auto chalate hai? To bhool jaao ki Delhi Vishwavidyalaya mei tumhare liye koi jagah hai.” (You belong to a poor family? Do your parents drive an auto-rickshaw? Then forget that there is any space for you in Delhi University). So, fee hikes are another issue that we are and will continue to fight against.

This is the same University where Dhani Ram, a professor from Ramjas College, harasses a first-year student, enjoys impunity, and further threatens her by saying, “Tumhare sattar number kaat lunga.” (I will cut your 70 marks). I am a graduate from Indraprastha College for Women, and 2.5 years ago, in our college’s fest, 230 written complaints were filed with the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC), despite which no action has been taken after the formation of a proctorial committee to date. We demand that all ICCs across colleges be functioning and democratic, with gender sensitisation workshops being made compulsory for the teaching faculty, non-teaching faculty, and the students.

Q. With increasing financial pressure on students, what steps would you advocate for better affordability?

Anjali: We strongly believe that the meaning of studying at Delhi University also means the ability to afford Delhi as a city, wherein the university itself is as big as a Lok Sabha constituency, consisting of North, South and Off-Campus colleges. Students from every corner of the country come to this university, but less than five per cent of students are able to get a hostel. The larger concerns about affordability and accessibility can only be addressed through the construction of more hostels.

In 2016 and 2017, the All India Students Association (AISA) launched a campaign titled “A Room of One’s Own”, showing higher authorities tracts of empty land which should have been, and can be, used for constructing hostels. In 2019, when a 39-storey building was constructed in front of the Vishwavidyala Metro Station, we protested and said, “McD, Pizza Hut ke bina zindagi chal jaayegi, Yaha hostel ka nirmaan kariye!” (We can live without McDonald’s and Pizza Hut. Make hostels here.)

A concessional metro pass is another demand. Travelling in a city like Delhi means that you have to spend around 100-120 rupees daily, and in this environment, just weeks ago, DMRC launched a notice increasing the token price in a range of Rs 1 to 4, depending on the distance. We are continuously fighting for concessional passes. We are from the student association that fought in 2017 to get concessional bus passes for students. Our model is that of resistance and continued struggle.

S: DU has a diverse student population across campuses, regions, and backgrounds. How will you ensure that voices from all corners of the university are included and represented?

A: If you look at the 2025 AISA-SFI panel and also the nature of politics that AISA represents, we have always fought for diversity and inclusion on the campus.

Even in this panel, Abhinandana hails from the northeast, Sohan worked as a security guard to pay his university fees, and Abhishek, whose parents came to Delhi in 2002, happened to fill out a form for the CRPF by chance and got a job through which he was able to get access to education. I hail from Gaya, Bihar, and in my village, most women have not studied beyond 12th. Even for my family, it is extremely difficult for them to understand why I am doing a master’s degree instead of focusing on marriage prospects. I feel that this resistance, the continued struggle for the education of all students of this university, is representative of its diversity. 

Additionally, we are from the student association that stood against communal hatred when a Northeast shop was attacked in Vijayanagara. We are from the student association that, along with 200 other students, marched into the Principal’s cabin at SBSC, after he slapped a Dalit student, demanding an end to caste-based discrimination, demanding his resignation and demanding the implementation of the SC/ST act. From Dhani Ram to the IPCW protests, AISA has been there, bearing witness to incidents of police brutality and administrative proceedings. I think our collective resistance is living proof of the fact that elections will come and go, but it is forces like us who will continue to struggle and work.

S: What specific, achievable changes can you realistically deliver within your one-year term if elected, and how will you show that progress to students?

A: Definitely, as I said before, the very burning question right now is quality, affordability and inclusivity. We will work towards the reduction of IA weightage, the restoration of quality education, democratisation and proper functioning of ICCs, the conduction of regular elections and gender sensitisation workshops for the ICCs across every college, and the provision of concessional metro passes for each and every student of the university. We will also fight for the creation of more affordable hostels and resist the arbitrary rise in rents of PGs and flats, demanding the implementation of the Rent Control Act.

Read More: Interview with Abhinandana Pratyashi | SFI Candidate | DUSU Elections 2025

Interview by Sakshi Singh

[email protected]

Image Credits: DU Beat

 

 

 

DU Beat in Conversation with Abhinandana Pratyashi

Abhinandana: So, hello everyone! My name is Abhinandana, and I am from North East, Assam. Assam is very popular for its floods, right? You must know Assam like that, but it is much more than that, because today I have become the first ever North Eastern Tribal person to contest for DUSU. I did my schooling in Assam, and I was the state topper both years. Now, I’m in Hindu College, pursuing Sociology Honours. I’m from SFI (Student Federation of India). 

Neeraja: Thank you for the introduction! I would like to start with, what do you think is the biggest challenge that DU students face right now? And how do you think you could improve on it?

A: See, the biggest challenge that Delhi University is facing right now is the hegemony of muscle and money politics that we see everywhere, right? We understand how the status quo prevails. People who are part of the hierarchy never want anybody else from below or outside the hierarchy to come and take space. And this is what that is personally, and that’s why socially and organizationally happening to me as well. Being a queer and being a Northeastern person, right? So, all these muscle and money politics and organizations that we see around ourselves, they are so visible. They have the money to visibilize themselves, right? So, they always take power over issues that are much more grounded. Those issues that need to be addressed, right? Like, for example, any of these issues that SFI is picking up. We can talk about fee hikes, we are talking about metro passes, and we are talking about women’s safety. But all of these issues, most of the time they are either co-opted by people who are not really affected by them or like just overpowered by muscle and money politics. So, this is like the biggest issue that we have right now. And the only way to challenge this or to combat this is with ground-level work. Unless there is proper education, there won’t be agitation.  And unless there is agitation, there won’t be an organization. And only when we have an organized mobilization of people, and only then, can we have some real change. And which is visible right now. So, right in front of me in my team, that’s Sneha, right? Sneha is standing right there. So, Sneha, without muscle and money politics, without the visibility of muscle and money politics, she was contesting last time; she gained 9000 votes.  And the person who won instead of her gained around 12,000 to 13,000. Look at the margin; this is a very small margin. So, this is the ground-level work we are talking about while combating the muscle and money politics that we see around ourselves.

N: Absolutely, thank you so much. Can I know some insights into the key pointers within your election manifestos?

A: Election manifestos, see, we are very grounded in the common student problems. First of all, the fee hike. Not many can afford to pay the fee that we are seeing right now. And that too, that is hiking, right? So, in Hindu College, in sociology honors, I am paying above 25k. If I had not had the scholarship that I have right now, I would not have even dreamt about coming to Hindu College and studying. I would have had to drop my education. And this is happening everywhere. Like in the Law Faculty, the fee before the new education policy, 3-4 years back, was Rs. 3000; now it is Rs. 8000. We see this constant fee hike. And in equivalence to that fee hike, we don’t even have basic to basic facilities. Like I said, I am from the North East, and Hindu College does have a girls’ hostel. But even there, I did not have the chance to get a seat in the hostel. So, if a girl from the North East is not getting a seat, then who will? You know the very popular case about the Hindu college boys’ hostel? It’s been privatised to such an extent that it’s been under construction for the past five years. In comparison, it took six years to build the Burj Khalifa.  And this is a problem everywhere. We are talking about affordable hostels so that the children do not have to commute so far, so that the students are not exploited by the PG mafia, the flat mafia. So, affordable education, first of all, means there is no fee hike. There should be a choice of accommodation. There should be a choice. There should be good and cheap food in the canteen. There should be a metro pass. See, a common student like us cannot afford to have our commuting prices go as high as 60 rupees in a single day. 100 rupees in a single day. That means, in a month, that is 3000 rupees, 2000 rupees. And you will see that the organizations with muscle money politics are roaming in big cars, BMWs, Thar, etc. What difference will it make to them that a common student like us cannot pay so much, right? So, this is one of the biggest issues we have been picking up in our manifesto. Because the students should at least get a concessional metro pass. Because it is simply very visibly non-affordable for our students, right? And apart from that, if we go to some branches of the points, Northeastern representation, of course, queer representation, of course. Because this is our space. Queer people say that half the sky isn’t enough. Of course, it’s not enough for us. We want representation. We want at least some kind of reservation. In the Hindu College Parliament, we have reservations. We are demanding the reservation of queer individuals, not just women, right? Not just cis-hetero women, but queer individuals, like I said. Along with that, basic issues, basic humanitarian issues. That xenophobia shouldn’t be there. That homophobia shouldn’t be there. That transphobia shouldn’t be there. So, these are some of the issues we are talking about. Like, basic to basic issues we are talking about in our manifesto.

N: That sounds amazing.  As you said, there are increasing financial crises that are happening. Like, the metro price hike, a fee hike, and hostel unavailability. How are you going to advocate for someone who is, like you said, the common student?

A: See, this is a very relevant question. Because this is seen everywhere. You must know that when we were contesting, the contestants who were contesting for the election had to sign a bond for 1 lakh. Right? So, a common student who comes from a marginalized background, the background I come from, I can’t even dream of contesting and having some representation in Delhi University Students’ Union. Because if you are signing a bond for 1 lakh, how will I pay the money? The people who are roaming around in cars can, of course, pay for it. But the one who is coming from a marginalized background, the already ostracized, is being continually ostracized. When you are putting up such bonds, when you are putting up such demands. So, this is a success of the panel that we are standing in, SFI AISA, our coalition of progressive organizations. So, you must know that the High Court has taken back this bond. Because we protested, we submitted a memorandum. So, when you ask how we combat these financial issues, that is combating. Combating can only happen through organization.  As I said, until there is no education, there will be no agitation. Without agitation, there will be no organization. People will have to organize on these common issues. Not just this 1 lakh bond. See, the rule passed by the Lyngdoh Committee this time, that people can’t throw around pamphlets. Because these pamphlets name people, reminding them, who can do that? The one who has muscle and money power, who has such funds, who has resources. So, people like us, coming from an ostracized background, have very little chance. Right? If we can’t have pamphlets flying around, how will people remember our name? How many times can we campaign, going from person to person? We can’t hire people to give away flyers. You must have seen, outside the college, people wearing Doraemon’s costume, Nobita’s costume, distributing flyers. We can’t hire such people. So, this time the Lyngdoh Committee has passed, so you can’t have such defacement. It can’t happen anymore. So, this is something that is, on a very minute level, combating the muscle and money politics, combating the financial discrepancy that we see. And, like, that’s why we are moving towards a more egalitarian election this time.

N: Like you said, this is something that might be personal to you also. DU has a diverse student culture across campuses, cultures, etc. How do you think you can represent people from all factions if you get elected?

A: See, even if you are from Bihar or if you are from Manipur, everyone is getting a free hike. Just because you can afford it, doesn’t mean you should have to. Because education is a fundamental right. Student mobility is a fundamental right. Students’ safety on campus is a fundamental right. So, the question of diversity pushes it further in a better direction. Here, fighting elections in a diverse environment, it’s much more inspiring because we see that, even after having a diverse background, these people are facing the same issues. So, it reinstates our power, in the idea, in the concept of the common student. Free hikes are happening with everyone. When a woman is exploited here, it’s not just about what background she is coming from; on the way, anyone can be catcalled. Right now, the background I come from, if a classmate from a different background comes from the North-East, she will be called a chinky here. I am queer, visibly queer, if a rich queer, or a poor queer, whose visible representation is queer, they will be hurled with homophobic slurs. So, I understand how class can have an impact on the discrimination we face, but just because of class differences, there is no discrimination against anyone. It’s not like that. Discrimination can be in different hierarchies. Like, a Dalit woman is more exploited, right? But that doesn’t mean that an upper-caste woman is not being exploited. So, in SFI, we believe in the organisation, until all of us are free, none of us are free. So, when I talk about diversity, diversity is one of the most positive things that we can have, when moving, when we are talking about our common student issues. 

N: What are some of the specific, achievable targets with which you can show your progress to students? How can you measure it, and how can you show it, in a specific sort of way?

A: When we say achievements that we have had as a common students’ organisation, first of all, I can talk about Hansraj. In Hansraj, the administration got land to make a girls’ hostel, right? And this is the case, everywhere. I mean, there is a space in SRCC, there is land in MLNC, to make a hostel, but the hostel is not being made. So, when this happened in Hansraj, then the admin said, No, we will make a cow shed here. Then, SFI, the common students’ organisation, protested that yes, you can make a cow shed. Of course, you are doing a good deed. Do a good deed outside the college. What is the right inside the college? What is the fundamental right of the girls? To make a hostel so that students are not exploited by the PG mafia. Expensive, unsafe PGs should not be there. Today, because of these protests, in Hansraj, a girls’ hostel has been set up. This is the power of a common students’ organisation. In JNU, you will see that the SFI AISA union has won many times in JNU. A left panel always wins in JNU. In JNU, you will see, every single student has access to the hostel. What they pay in a month for the room rent is 10 rupees. This is the power of a common students’ organisation. In Miranda, you will know, Miranda’s hostel fees are very popular for their low cost, right? And why is that? When in the middle of the night, the fee in Miranda went up 5000, right? See, 5000 might not mean much to people with BMWs and Thars, but 5000 means a lifetime to us. When it went up, SFI protested,in the middle of the night, and the fee was lowered, I mean, so this is the power of a common student’s organisation. And we were talking about concessional metro passes, right? At Hyderabad University, SFI has formed a union. Now, every single student in Hyderabad University has a concessional metro pass. They get 60% off. The 80 rupees we pay here, they pay 35 or 40 rupees there. This is the power of a common students’ organisation. So, when you say achievable things, when we talk about achievements, it is also an inspiration for us, that yes, when a common students’ organisation comes to power, things can happen. Now, I am from Hindu College. In Hindu College, there was a very regressive culture, V-Tree Pooja, Virgin Tree Pooja. When I came in my first year, in Virgin Tree, they used to hang water-filled condoms. They used to paste pictures of women whom they wanted to break their virginity with. When I came in the first year, my picture was also pasted there. It’s clearly a type of harassment, right? So, along with SFI, I had protested, and today, V-Tree Pooja doesn’t happen there anymore. This is the power of a common students’ organisation. Be it fee hike, be it affordability, accessible hostels, metro passes, or be it misogyny. All of these fights have been achieved, all of these things have been achieved, with SFI being in the union, without SFI being in the union. Because, whether it is an election or not, whether you are a common student or not, if you are a common student, then you have to fight, always.

N: Absolutely. Thank you so much for the interview!

 

Read Also: Campus Promises: ABVP, NSUI, and SFI–AISA Manifestos 2025

Neeraja Unnikrishnan

[email protected]

 

With DUSU election day less than a week away, tensions rise as Delhi’s largest student body puts forth its demands and expectations from the parties it votes for. Infrastructural upgrades, increased hostel seats, and campus hygiene remain the most widespread demands.

 

Stakes are high as tensions and excitement rise over the upcoming Delhi University Students’ Union (DUSU) elections which are to be held on September 18th, 2025. The counting of votes is scheduled for the following day, on September 19th 2025. The DUSU elections serve as a platform that acts as a stepping stone for students into politics, either as representatives or voters. With the University of Delhi having the largest student body in the capital, the parties involved in the DUSU elections certainly have a significant weight on their shoulders.

Students have put forth multiple demands with increased hostel availability and campus hygiene being top concerns. First year philosophy student, K.Sameepya from Indraprastha College for Women stated that the administration is quite detached from the students.

“If you want to connect with [the administration] there are a lot of things you kind of have to jump through. And even then it is actually quite difficult to connect with any of them.”

A first year student from SRCC remarked on the need for improved safety outside colleges, particularly women’s colleges. She also raised concerns about the lack of campus hygiene, talking about the state of the restrooms on campus saying,“with the current conditions of the washrooms, you wouldn’t even want to step in there.” Akanksha Singh, a first year student from Ramjas College talked about how the restrooms do not have proper doors – “So, even dogs sometimes come and go in the washrooms on the ground floor.” The availability of hostels, especially for first year students and students from out of state, needs to be increased according to several students.

The release of the manifesto was also a concern. Akanksha Singh, among other students, expressed their frustration over candidates simply “barging into classrooms” before introducing their names and blatantly asking for votes. Candidates generally give little information about their past work, promises and what they stand for, skipping to directly asking for votes. Students say that it is difficult to vote for people they don’t really know they can trust.

The 2025 DUSU elections are likely to be the most competitive yet with the introduction of the fourth year for undergraduate degrees by the NEP. This implies that third year students are no longer considered “final year” students and are hence eligible to compete for positions such as President and Vice-President, increasing the overall competitiveness of the entire process. Further, the 2025 elections will follow stricter guidelines with bans and limitations on loudspeakers, banners, and posters. Posters are to remain handmade and put up in only certain locations. This is expected after the vote counting for the 2024 elections was withheld upon the involvement of the High Court due to alleged defacement of public property.

The presidential candidates for this year’s elections include Aryan Maan for the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), Joslyn Choudhary for the National Students’ Union of India (NSUI), and Anjali for the SFI(Students’ Federation of India)-AISA(All India Students’ Association). With the highly competitive atmosphere of the DUSU elections, each candidate is likely to give the other a run for their money. 

 

Read Also: Protest at Motilal Nehru College against Student Election Nominations

 

Souparnika.S.R

[email protected] 

 

Image Credits: Jansatta

With the Delhi University Students’ Union elections approaching, major student organisations have released their manifestos announcing promises, reflecting issues, and revealing both overlaps and contrasts in priorities.

There are significant variances as well as obvious parallels between the ABVP, NSUI, and SFI-AISA coalition manifestos. The goals of these three parties are to solve persistent problems in Delhi University politics, such as women’s safety, campus infrastructure, and affordability. However, each uniquely presents its strategy, answering critiques of earlier DUSU terms and reflecting its ideological foundations.

Student health and welfare have been foregrounded more strongly this year. ABVP explicitly promised, “subsidised health insurance schemes for students”, a measure that responds to recurring demands for affordable healthcare after years of rising living costs. NSUI brought the conversation into the gendered domain, with its women’s manifesto pledging, “helpline numbers, menstrual health awareness, sanitary pad vending machines, and proper gender sensitivity measures.” The SFI-AISA alliance combined health and gender justice, promising menstrual leave and insisting on institutional structures like, “elected Internal Complaints Committees and gender sensitisation cells in all colleges”.

The only organisation to make a specific commitment on digital access is ABVP, which has pledged “free Wi-Fi access for university students.” Although the Left alliance and NSUI did not use the same language to emphasise Wi-Fi, they both emphasised infrastructure and accessibility in more general terms, implying a move away from band-aid technological solutions and towards structural reforms.

The affordability debate remains central, carrying forward unresolved issues from past years, such as fee hikes and opposition to the National Education Policy (NEP). The SFI-AISA alliance has taken the clearest stance, stating that it has, “pledged to oppose fee hikes” and presenting its programme as ‘a true student-centric manifesto.’ NSUI echoed this with calls for, “public funding for equitable education” and a rejection of NEP-linked restructuring. ABVP, while not quoted as directly opposing fee hikes, emphasised subsidised schemes and improved facilities.

Women’s safety and inclusion, an issue repeatedly raised after incidents on campus in previous years, has again appeared prominently. NSUI’s separate women’s manifesto is notable in its detail, listing concrete measures like, “helpline numbers, menstrual health awareness, sanitary pad vending machines, and proper gender sensitivity measures.” The SFI-AISA alliance, in line with its activist tradition, focused on structural reform: “elected Internal Complaints Committees and gender sensitisation cells in all colleges.” ABVP’s framing was broader, with its candidate speeches highlighting campus safety and “accessibility audits for students with special needs.”

Finally, housing and hostels continue to be a major theme, reflecting perennial shortages and past protests by outstation students. ABVP’s manifesto directly included, “construction of new hostels to accommodate growing student needs.” NSUI’s broader call for inclusive infrastructure implicitly covered hostel provisions, while SFI-AISA explicitly folded hostel expansion into its demands for resisting privatisation. 

While all parties echo recurring demands like safety, hostels, and digital access, their manifestos also respond to past gaps, some promising continuity, others pledging fresh reforms to long-standing student concerns.

 

Image Credits: Manan for DU Beat

Anjali Kumari Jha
[email protected]

Read Also: ASAP, The New Student Wing of AAP, Refrains from Contesting DUSU Polls Days Before the Election

Amidst the roar of Motilal Nehru College’s student elections, the college witnessed a protest led by the students against unfair candidate nominations. 

On 10th September 2025, the gates of Motilal Nehru College were closed for the teachers and the faculty by a student-led protest due to unfair intervention in student elections. The displeasure was stirred up as the students had been working on their election campaigns for the past two months, but the final list, released that day, contained only 7 names for 6 posts. This number was selected from an application of 107 students. The President candidature was permitted to a single student from the swarm of 14 nominees. This, the student protesters said, was an unjust treatment of the hopes and efforts of the students. The protest, which began at 6 in the evening, was carried out till late in the dark with the demonstrators refusing food or water. Instead of hearing the concerns of the protestors, the principal called forth police authorities, which led to a female candidate getting pushed by a male officer.

The authorities claimed attendance to be the criteria for selection. According to the official Delhi University regulations, the candidates require 50% attendance to clear their nominations, but MNLC changed it to 75% weeks prior to the elections. This became the main reason for the discourse in the student body. The students also displayed their discontent upon the appointment of a first year for the post of Vice President.

A student from the college told DU Beat,

The candidate for the position of Vice President is running unopposed even though he has been in the college for just a month, without the knowledge of any rules, or even stepping a foot in the campus all thanks to knowing people at high positions and having connections.

The protest began immediately after the release of the official list, with the students locking the gates of the college to prevent anyone from leaving the campus. The students raised their voices outside the principal’s office and the admin block also, but to no avail. The principal’s office was blocked by the protestors, and while they stood on their stance outside in the heat, the faculty refused to take any actions. The candidates went inside the office to clarify the situation with the principal but returned disheartened. The police arrived at 10 at night to break up the mob and to escort the Principal safely outside. The candidates decided to protest in front of the police vehicles but were controlled by force. It was unanimously decided to continue the protest overnight. College premises were occupied by police authorities, SSB and police vans in the morning after the gates were bolted by the protestors again. The principal arrived at around 11, finally allowing entrance into the college and had another meeting with candidates but no changes were agreed upon. This has led to all the student groups—ABVP, B.O.S.S, Ignite and other Independent candidates—coming and standing together. 

Read Also: SFI and AISA Forge Alliance for DUSU Elections, Vow to Challenge ‘Money and Muscle Power’

Featured Image Credits: MNLC on Instagram

Ananya Agarwal

[email protected]

 

 

On Monday, 1st September 2025, the RSS-affiliated Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) launched its new, eco-friendly “Clean Campus, Green Campus” campaign for the Delhi University Students’ Union (DUSU) elections.

The campaign featured a bicycle rally that commenced at Vishwavidyalaya Metro station and proceeded to several North Campus colleges, including Ramjas College, Hindu College, Kirori Mal College and Daulat Ram College, before concluding at the Arts Faculty.

The campaign aligns with the efforts of the student union to keep the electioneering process “environment-friendly and campus-friendly”. According to ABVP leader Harsh Atri, the union will keep introducing thoughtful, eco-friendly campaigning practices such as bicycle rallies and clean-up drives. These endeavours complement the ABVP’s goal to keep the entire process of campaigning clean, transparent, and peaceful. The union is allegedly reaching out to students and strictly adhering to the Delhi High Court guidelines in its campaigning practices. 

The emphasis on responsible campaigning is well expected, as the 2024 DUSU elections had brought about legal trouble due to the violation of court directives and the Lyngdoh Committee’s guidelines for defacement of public property, leading to the halting of vote counting by the High Court until all defacement was undone and the restoration of public property had been completed.

On Thursday, 28th August 2025, the ABVP released a list of 11 probable candidates for the 2025 DUSU elections, which are set to take place on 18th September 2025. The final list of four candidates for the central panel will be released on Thursday, 11th September. The counting of votes will take place on 19th September 2025 under strict measures in order to avoid any form of defacement or disruption.

Featured Image Credits: @RohitDedhaABVP on X

Read Also:  ABVP and NSUI Welcome Freshers: A New Year of DU Student Politics

Souparnika
[email protected]

Delhi University tells the Delhi High Court it is scrapping the ₹1 lakh bond rule for DUSU poll candidates. Students now only submit an affidavit and security bond after petitions argued that the clause was arbitrary, exclusionary, and unconstitutional.

The Delhi University on Friday informed the Delhi High Court that candidates contesting the Delhi University Students’ Union (DUSU) elections will no longer be required to deposit ₹1 lakh bond, as earlier mandated by an 8 August notification. The university said that the provision was withdrawn following widespread criticism and legal challenges.

Representing the University, counsel Rupal Mohinder submitted before Justice Mini Pushkarna that election candidates will now only need to provide an affidavit and a security bond at the time of filing nominations. The clarification came during the hearing of a petition filed by two students, Anjali and Abhishek Kumar, challenging the 8 August notification that introduced the ₹1 lakh deposit rule.

The contested notification was issued with the stated objective of preventing university defacement and public property during elections scheduled for 18 September. The university argued that the hefty bond was intended to avoid a repeat of last year’s incidents, when widespread defacement forced the High Court to delay the counting and declaration of results by nearly two months after the September 2024 polls.

However, petitioners, represented by advocate Raja Choudhary, contended that the rule was arbitrary, discriminatory, and unconstitutional under Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. They argued that the provision disproportionately affected students from middle class and rural backgrounds, effectively excluding them from the electoral process. The plea further pointed out that the rule contradicted the Lyngdoh Committee recommendations, which assign joint liability to candidates for defacement rather than imposing individual financial burdens.

“The impugned clause subverts the democratic ethos of student unions, turning elections into an elitist arena, contrary to judicial mandates for inclusivity,” the petition stated. It was also alleged that the registrar lacked the authority to introduce such a condition.

The 8 August notification drew sharp criticism from several students’ groups. The Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) earlier this month submitted a memorandum to the university administration opposing the deposit requirement. The group demanded immediate withdrawal of the provision and warned of large-scale campus agitation if it was not revoked.

Student leaders argued that the rule went against the spirit of campus democracy by restricting participation to those who could afford the steep bond. Many have also questioned the practicality of such a measure, claiming that it would not address the root causes of poster wars and graffiti.

Taking note of the university’s submission, the High Court disposed the petition filed by the two students. The court’s acknowledgement effectively removes this contentious requirement, allowing the electoral process to continue without financial hurdles for candidates.

The DUSU elections, scheduled for 18 September are a significant event in Delhi University’s political calendar and are often seen as a reflection of broader student politics across the country. With the withdrawal of the bond requirement, the focus is expected to return to key campus issues such as affordability of education, hostel facilities, and the quality of academic programs.

The university administration has yet to clarify which alternative steps, if any, will be taken to curb defacement during elections. For now, candidates will contest under the revised rules, with only one affidavit and security bond required at the time of nomination filing.

Read Also – DU Not Bound to Share PM Modi’s Degree Records, Says Delhi HC

Featured Image source – Hindustan Times

Richa Choudhary

[email protected]