Tag

St. Stephen’s College

Browsing

Our conversation with Rene Sharanya Verma, a student of History at St. Stephen’s College, slam poet and feminist rapper, and one of the five Indian recipients of the prestigious Rhodes scholarship, reveals her expectations and plans for the future.

Q. How does it feel to have secured one of the most prestigious scholarships offered to Indian students by a foreign university?

Rene: It’s quite surreal, really! I’m humbled and honoured to be joining a cohort of eighty-eight other inspiring and inspired individuals around the world who are working in profound ways to create a better future through the fields of advocacy, gender relations, policy formulation, ethics, and healthcare. More than anything, availing of the privilege to study at a premier institution like Oxford reaffirms my commitment to using my voice and work to contribute to larger cultural and political conversations across the world.

Q. What course have you chosen to study at Oxford and what is your particular interest in this subject? How does it compare with similar courses at other institutions?

Rene: I intend to pursue two Masters of Studies (MSt) programs in Women’s Studies and Film Aesthetics. Ultimately, I aim to work on feminist film theory, engaging with how filmic elements like playback music, colour, light shape and are shaped by the performance of gender. Additionally, I am interested in addressing notions of spectatorship in the context of Indian cinema.  I also hope to create films, both fictive and ethnographic, which combine my love for spoken word art, narrative cinema, humor as a site for politics and advocacy.

Both programs offer an interesting blend of interdisciplinary engagement along with specificity of the course modules provided. They focus on research methodology and theory, have small batches of students, and the thrust is on original research through one-on-one mentoring and tutoring. More exciting however, is the provision of opportunities to work with the Oxford International Women’s Festival, the Women in the Humanities programme, and the International Gender Studies Centre. This provides a great chance for young scholars in the academy to engage with grassroots activism and the possibilities and challenges of transnational feminism.

Q. Most students are apprehensive about the daunting application process that is involved in applying to foreign universities. How was your experience?

Rene: I spent my second year hoping for the best and preparing for the worst. I can vouch for the fact that application processes seem much more daunting than they actually are, especially if one paces themselves and is cognizant of deadlines. The process of applying to Rhodes is quite straightforward, and in distinction to other scholarship applications, begins quite early. I was able to zero in on my course combinations towards the end of my second year in college, and worked on my application during my summer study, which was beneficial.

One of the great things about the Rhodes scholarship is the amount of support you receive from the Rhodes Trust in assisting and streamlining the application process to the University, with reference to English language requirements, connecting with scholars from previous years and same courses/colleges. All in all, my experience has been very rewarding and relatively stress-free, so I’m quite relieved!

Q. What would be your advice to students applying abroad regarding statements of purpose and letters of recommendation?

Rene: The personal statement for the scholarship is a thousand word essay designed to present a concise version of one’s goals, aspirations, and by extension, who one really is. It can seem challenging at first, but I would highly recommend that candidates begin by thinking about the differences between an academic statement of purpose, a personal statement and a resume. It might ease one into thinking about how to approach the personal statement in a sui generis way- there is no right or wrong personal statement. I think the best way to go ahead is to present cogently and simply the arguments, questions, ideas, experiences that best define you. For instance, my statement revolved around silence, interweaving personal anecdotes with my academic proclivities and aims.

For the letters of recommendation, it would be prudent to approach professors, mentors and teachers who have encouraged your work through supervision, tutoring, discussion and are well aware of your strengths and weaknesses. I think that extends to certificates vouching for good conduct and extra-curricular activities.  It’s crucial to notify your references well in advance, keeping in mind their work schedules and other commitments. It is always helpful to provide referees with an idea of your proposed area of study, a resume and transcripts or other relevant documents.

Q. How was your experience at the interview? On a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the highest, how nervous were you?

Rene:  My interview experience was quite wonderful! I did experience jitters (which would ring in at a very strong 6) prior to the interview, but luckily, the committee organized a dinner with the interview panel a night prior to our final interviews. We got to interact with the panellists, distinguished scholars, professionals, and Rhodes scholars from previous years– who were kind, jocular and very accommodating. The setup also ensured that we got to interact with our peers, which was one of the most rewarding takeaways from the experience, as some of us formed great friendships.

The interview itself was refreshing and thought-provoking. It never seemed like an interrogation, and was an engagement where I was given a lot of space to articulate my beliefs and politics, research interests and achievements. The panel was not intimidating, au contraire, the panellists were very responsive to my answers and even shared a few jokes!

Q. What, according to you, was the most instrumental factor that led you to achieve the scholarship?

Rene: One thing that I’ve learnt is that there is no one type of Rhodes Scholar, and indeed, therein lies the beauty of the scholarship. I’d like to believe that one of the most instrumental factors that aided me was that I tried to be as honest about my beliefs as possible- to the interview panels, selection committee and most importantly to myself. I reckon my interests, both academic and extra-curricular, ranging from film-making, screenwriting, theater, spoken-word poetry demonstrated a singularity of purpose, and an unequivocal avowal to ideas I am passionate about.

Q. Do you have any apprehensions about moving so far away from home?

Rene: I have lived away from home prior to this, but never for so long. I’m going to miss the little things- hugging my family in vivo, eating in North Campus, walking in the Lodhi gardens. Living alone has also made me check my privilege and be grateful for things I took for granted—like household chores, food, and the presence of loved ones. Most importantly, I’m quite nervous about the weather, but I hope to bask in the ever-elusive sun as long as possible!

Q. What are you looking forward to at Oxford? Any expectations?

Rene: I’m looking forward to using two years of my life to expand my horizons, meet new people, travel on a budget, and create some meaningful work.  I am excited to join a vast community of intellectuals, engage with a multitude of ideas, and forge lasting friendships. I’m delighted to be connecting with advocates for gender equality from across the world, fellow poets and writers and I hope to work with theatre, sketch comedy and film clubs while I’m there!

Abhinaya Harigovind

[email protected]

A plastic disc sails through the air and an agile player deftly plucks it out of the air in one fell swoop, to fling it halfway across the field again. The sport that revolves around these ‘flying discs’ is currently the fastest growing sport in the world. To learn about this non-contact sport that is taking Delhi University by storm, DU Beat catches up with a few students of St.Stephen’s College who have constituted ‘Hawabaaz’, an Ultimate Frisbee team.

Dias Mario Antony, a MA student of History and captain of Hawabaaz, is quick to tell us that the sport, though popularly known as ‘Frisbee,’ is officially named ‘Ultimate,’ while ‘Frisbee’ is the name of the flying disc manufactured by the Wham-O toy company. Having watched previous batches of St. Stephens’ College, a group of students came together, resulting in a cohesive team-Hawabaaz that conducts intensive team practices every morning, along with their coach, Suhani Bedi, who plays for the Indian National Ultimate Frisbee team. Hawabaaz has played at tournaments such as the one held by the Ashoka University, with individual players participating at the Hat Tournament 2015, Delhi.

On the skill sets that the sport helps them to pick up, the team stresses upon stamina, endurance and agility. Each member contributes a different skill, forming an efficient team. “At least three female members are required to be a part of every team and there is no discrimination,” says Maria Benny, a second year student. A concept known as the ‘spirit of the game’ ensures that Ultimate is the only sport that is not supervised by a referee. This demands that conflicts are resolved immediately and peacefully on the field, requiring patience on the part of the players. Abi Thampi, a third year student, emphasizes on the stamina that the sport has helped him build. The team concurs- one does not require a certain level of fitness to begin playing the game.

Hawabaaz is hoping to get more students from Delhi University involved in this game that means the world to them.

Featured Image Credits: www.thesportsarmy.com

The Electronics Society, St.Stephen’s College, organised India’s first drone racing event on 31st October, 2015. The chief guest for the event was Ghanshyam Tiwari, Senior Naval Officer, DRDO. The race saw the participation of 12 flyers, four from the college itself and the remaining eight from different professional backgrounds and colleges. Some of the flyers raced hand-made drones that were prepared from scratch and raced them using hand made controllers.

HygF74rM9NHYevssjldw757fzNluCyhvF95s75M4XCM

 

For the race, an obstacle avoidance course was designed and created by the Electronics Society. The participants had to manouvre their drone through several loops along a fixed course. The race was accompanied by an air-show of sorts with the participants making their drones perform air flips and tricky stunts, with a drone occassionally crashing into the trees, before it was hurriedly retrieved. The audience, of over 200 people, watched the skies in awe as the drones flipped and swished through the air. The winner of the race was Maulik Chaudhary, a graduate student and professional RC pilot with over five years of experience. The race also saw the participation of a class 12 student  with six years of experience-evidence of the passion and dedication that the flyers have for this acivity.

Screen Shot 2015-10-31 at 11.58.06 pm

Robin John, a third year Physics Honours student, who was one of the organisers of the event, said, “The event was one of of a kind since it was entirely hosted and sponsored by the students. Astartup, spearheaded by third year Physics students, SPARC Robotics, worked in collaboration with the Electronics Society. We constructed our own carbon fibre printed drones from scratch, particularly drones that cost a lot less than the ones available in the market, as well as our own racing track for the drones. The aim was to make it easier for people at the entry level, like hobby flyers and photographers.”

 

Qv7mvQz3e2WwD-_MUJc9Y0jzpAZOvcHc-12B1xc-B4g

The event was also marked by the simultaneous exhibition of a drone assembly line detailing the manner in which drones are made using modern technology like 3D printers. The race was covered by an in-house drone mounted with a camera for aerial shoots.

 

Image credits: Akarshan Rao and Sajiv Soni

Abhinaya Harigovind

[email protected]

 

The Gender Studies Cell, St.Stephen’s College flagged off its activities for the year with its maiden event- Taboo Diaries: Chapter 1- Hijab amongst other things. The event was primarily an informal discussion presided over by eight speakers, all students of the college- Mahroosh Banday, Tauheed Haqqani, Hishma Nazir, Muskaan Bhat, Farkhanda Zahoor, Insha Mushtaq, Sumaiyya Shamim and Usman Zafar. The speakers’ reflections and statements were followed by an unplugged interaction with a packed room of over 60 eager students.

The statements made by the speakers served as a useful insight into their own personal experiences with and opinions concerning the hijab. They raised significant questions of choice and free will, the purpose and origin of the hijab and their own ways of coming to terms with the hijab and their religion. Interspersed with wit, the speakers enunciated their points clearly, giving those less acquainted with this theme a wider perspective on it. Some of the speakers also raised questions of being seen as a conservative person for wearing the hijab, the hijab giving them a sense of proximity and attachment to their God, religion and community and the questions they are sometimes asked when they don the hijab, like, whether it gets hot underneath in the summer! The discussion that followed emphasized upon personal choice and the flexibilities inherent in every religion and the similarities among them. Muskaan Bhat, one of the speakers, says, “Choice is independent of all social norms, political strategies or internalised conventions. I wear the hijab, not because patriarchal minds are forcing me to do it, but because I love it.”

Prerna Subramanian, the editor of the Gender Studies Cell journal, Kon, says, “We decided to have a discussion revolving around the hijab since it has always been a matter of contention and curiosity. People often tend to make uneducated remarks and one wants to know from the horse’s mouth as to what really is the case.”  According to Ankita Srivastava, a student who was at the discussion, the event has been an eye-opener in terms of the flexibility and choice that religion allows. She was surprised at the fact that none of the speakers were compelled to, or knew of anyone who was compelled to, wear the hijab.

The Gender Studies Cell, under its umbrella theme for the year-Taboosaims at conducting talks in the future on topics like the politics of make up, disability and sexual desire, and taboos related to menstruation and masturbation, hoping to generate enriching discussions on these themes.

With inputs from Rene Sharanya Verma, Head Coordinator, The Gender Studies Cell

 

Abhinaya Harigovind

[email protected]

 

The Gender Studies Cell, St.Stephen’s College flagged off its activities for the year with its maiden event- Taboo Diaries: Chapter 1- Hijab amongst other things. The event was primarily an informal discussion presided over by eight speakers, all students of the college- Mahroosh Banday, Tauheed Haqqani, Hishma Nazir, Muskaan Bhat, Farkhanda Zahoor, Insha Mushtaq, Sumaiyya Shamim and Usman Zafar. The speakers’ reflections and statements were followed by an unplugged interaction with a packed room of over 60 eager students. The statements made by the speakers served as a useful insight into their own personal experiences with and opinions concerning the hijab. They raised significant questions of choice and free will, the purpose and origin of the hijab and their own ways of coming to terms with the hijab and their religion. Interspersed with wit, the speakers enunciated their points clearly, giving those less acquainted with this theme a wider perspective on it. Some of the speakers also raised questions of being seen as a conservative person for wearing the hijab, the hijab giving them a sense of proximity and attachment to their God, religion and community and the questions they are sometimes asked when they don the hijab, like, whether it gets hot underneath in the summer! The discussion that followed emphasized upon personal choice and the flexibilities inherent in every religion and the similarities among them. Muskaan Bhat, one of the speakers, says, “Choice is independent of all social norms, political strategies or internalised conventions. I wear the hijab, not because patriarchal minds are forcing me to do it, but because I love it.” Prerna Subramanian, the editor of the Gender Studies Cell journal, Kon, says, “We decided to have a discussion revolving around the hijab since it has always been a matter of contention and curiosity. People often tend to make uneducated remarks and one wants to know from the horse’s mouth as to what really is the case.”  According to Ankita Srivastava, a student who was at the discussion, the event has been an eye-opener in terms of the flexibility and choice that religion allows. She was surprised at the fact that none of the speakers were compelled to, or knew of anyone who was compelled to, wear the hijab. The Gender Studies Cell, under its umbrella theme for the year-Taboosaims at conducting talks in the future on topics like the politics of make up, disability and sexual desire, and taboos related to menstruation and masturbation, hoping to generate enriching discussions on these themes. With inputs from Rene Sharanya Verma, Head Coordinator, The Gender Studies Cell   Abhinaya Harigovind [email protected]  ]]>

Disclaimer: Bazinga is DU Beat’s weekly column of almost believable fake news!

Yes, you probably saw it right! St. Stephens College and Shri Ram College of Commerce have finally given in to the much absurd reforms being brought into India’s top ranked varsity, the Delhi University. According to our sources at SRCC, the authorities had sought an expert panel discussion last week and a subsequent move-out from the aegis of the university was finalised.

The problem and the consequent action is not being seen as a move in haste but a planned event. Both the colleges were already wary of the newly yet naïvely introduced Four Year Undergraduate Programme and had aired their possible move-out last year just after the introduction of this much controversial programme.

After the shocking news, which hit headlines yesterday, reactions are still coming in. A teacher from St. Stephens College who talked to us after we promised anonymity, said, “I have been an admirer of this new concept, FYUP, but the way in which it is being implemented has created an amount of havoc among the students as well as the teachers. Hence, I totally support my college’s move.”  When we asked her, if the college’s future would become uncertain on opting out of DU, she said, “St. Stephens is ranked amongst the best in India, not because of the DU tag, but due to the efforts of college authorities, its teachers and its excellent students, and none of them would go after we move out, hence we will retain our position at the top.”

Another teacher Ms. Rotu Hasta of SRCC said, “The admiration we have received till date is partly because of the college’s own efforts and partly due to Delhi University’s legacy and position. I am unsure if we will be able to survive without the university’s tag.”

Students of both the colleges are facing a dilemma on the same. With some supporting the move and others against it, mixed reactions are being seen. Protest marches have been arranged by the unions of both the colleges who are against the decision. “We will not turn down our protests till the decision is revised. They are putting our future in danger”, said a senior member of St. Stephens’ union.
DU authorities who might be a bit worried as of now, have refused to comment. Though sources tell us that constant phone calls are being made to the authorities of both the colleges through back channels to instigate them to revert the decision. Speculations have it, that a possible retraction of the FYUP has also been offered by DU to both the colleges.  Keep tuned to the latest updates on the same.

Disclaimer: Bazinga is DU Beat’s weekly column of almost believable fake news!

Shakespeare Sabha, the Multilingual Dramatics Society of St. Stephen’s College organised Daastan’14 – the first national theatre fest of the college on 22nd-25th February. The four-day festival saw famous personalities coming in, theatre conferences, the desi-street passion and the set stage performances.

Personalities and Theatrics

The festival kickstarted on 22nd February and was inaugurated by Mr. Barry John who held a panel discussion in the college on the topic – Scope of Experimentation in Campus Theatre. He talked about how flexible the campus theatre format is to encourage certain degree of experimentation into theatre and other panelists were presenting their views on the same.

This was followed by the Student Paper presentation where students who believe that they know and understand the fascinating world of theatre, had to present their views on the topic “Theatre and Ideology”.

Day two saw an interactive session with Mr. Girish Karnad, one of the foremost playwrights and directors in India. This was another discussion on theatrics and implementation.

Anhad: The street fever

Followed by different call songs, loud voices, social issues, self composed tracks, dhols, drums, dance and reality, day two also featured Anhad – The Street Play competition. As a part of the same, 13 teams from the University performed their annual productions on different social issues.

Anhad was judged by Ms. Dhwani (a theatre alumni from Kirori Mal College), Mr Rahul Khanna (Works with Asmita Theatre Group) and Mr. Anuj (Works with Tadpole Theatre). Mr. Anuj said, “All 13 teams presented a spectacular show infront of us, and it was tough to jugde and decide the winners.”

The results were as follows:

First Position – Ankur, The street play society of SGTB Khalsa College for ‘We, The People’
Second Position – Shri Guru Gobind Singh College of Commerce – Manchantantra for ‘Chidiya ki kahaani’
Third position – Kshitij (Gargi College) for Joota and KehKasha (Jesus and Mary College) for Guna hai, par sazaa nahi

Bhaasha: Ramjas takes home the stage

Day 3 and Day 4 were slotted for Bhaasha – the multilingual one-act play inter-college competition. The event was judged by Mr. Benil Biswas – Assistant Professor at the School of Culture and Creative Expressions, Ambedkar University where he teaches Performance Studies. Second judge for Bhaasha was Mr. Neel Sengupta who is an alumni from Kirori Mal College and works with Tadpole Theatre Company.

Bhaasha saw 9 stage performances from various different colleges of Delhi. The festival witnessed both original and adapted  scripts alongside competent story lines and execution. Plays talked about identities, emotions, friendships on one hand and betrayal, revenge and loss on the other. They were beautifully portrayed by different light effects, sound and music and flashbacks as suited.

The results for Bhaasha were as follows:

First Position: Ramjas College for Nishaanchi 
First runners-up: SGTB Khalsa for Can’t Pay, Won’t Pay 
Second runners-up: Hansraj College for Holi
Special Mention: Delhi Technological University for Kya Dilli, Kya Lahore
Best Direction: Nishaanchi (Ramjas College) – Directed by Gopal and Prashant
Best Actor: Praveen Shukla for Nishaanchi (Ramjas College)
Special Mention: Kshitij Mervin for Nishaanchi (Ramjas College) and Gagan Arora for The Dark Room (SBSC Evening College)

The Prize Distribution Ceremony was followed by individual team feedback from both the judges. Mr. Sengupta said, “College plays that are self scripted are generally found to be adapted from the popular culture, that is our cinema and adapted plays sometimes fail to impress due to certain miscalculations. Though there is a lot of scope in campus theatre, teams need to explore and research more.”

St. Stephen’s Spic Macay organized an Indian history and culture quiz called ‘Sanskriti’ on Tuesday, 4th February at the seminar room of St. Stephen’s College.

The quiz started with a bang with over 12 online registrations and 17 on spot registrations. Teams were registered with a maximum of two members.

The prelims consisted of 20 questions. Ishaan Taneja and Deepak Kumar, students pursuing science from Stephens conducted the quiz. With the cut off score of 10 points for selection, 8 teams were selected for finals.

With a rigorous final round, Prakriti and Adithya representing Sri Venkateshwara College emerged as winners taking home cash prize of Rs. 2500. The cross college team of Vasant from Kirori Mal College and Bishal from Ramjas College bagged the second prize worth Rs. 1500.

Gagan Mahajan, Co-ordinator Spic Macay quoted, “This was the first quiz organized by Spic Macay of our college and turned out to be a success!”

The final day at St. Stephen’s National Science Fest started off with a conventional debate. Organised by the Debating Society, the motion for the NSF Debate was, “This house will allow parents to choose the genetic composition of their kids”. The event witnessed participation from a total of nine teams, with Hindu College emerging as the best team.

The winning team comprised of Vibhor Mathur and Nomaan Hassan. Nomaan’s argument against the motion, also won him the title of the Best Speaker of the debate.

The adjudicating panel for the event comprised of Riya Sharma, Midhandeep Jain and Mehvish Rathor – all experienced debaters of the Stephen’s clan. One of the adjudicators says, “Some really astounding ideas came up, such as how tolerance for diversity is a perhaps a very trivial part of human culture – which certainly does make a lot of sense if you can defend it well. The debate surely had some interesting moments.”

treasure-hunt-1
Winners of the Treasure hunt.

The closing event for the National Science Fest was a culmination a ride ranging from different corners of Stephen’s through the Treasure Hunt. Parichay Mazumdar, Maitreyee Rudola, Ayushi Kathayat and Sadiah Zahoor of St. Stephen’s College emerged as the winning team in the same.

The organising committee also announced the results for Competition of Young Scientists and Enthusiasts (CYSAE), a multidisciplinary competition held on the previous day. From six teams that went into the finals, St. Stephen’s College emerged as the winner, with a team from IIT Delhi settling for the second position. The winning team from St. Stephen’s College comprised of Nishchaiy Suri, Shreya Arya and Ojasvi Khare.

The second day at St. Stephen’s National Science Fest started with the interdisciplinary Competition of Young Scientists and Enthusiasts (CYSAE). 12 teams started off in the competition, out of which 8 moved on to the second round. The second round comprised of programming problems and required participants to design algorithms in any programming language. With the ability to approach a maximum of five problems in one hour, six teams moved on to the final round on the basis of the same. In the final round, while four teams were from Stephen’s, the other two were from Hansraj College and IIT Delhi. In the final round, the six teams were supposed to first choose between Physics and Chemistry, and then solve a set of five questions based on that subject in the span of one hour. The final results of the competition are still awaited.

sysae round3
Students solving Physics problems in the final round of CYSAE.

The initial events of the day also had a Scientifik Exhibition on Innovative Practices for the Conservation of Natural Resources judged by Dr. Kinkini Dasgupta Misra, from the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India. Out of the 5 contenders, the team from Army Public School was declared the winning team.

Moving from academia, the day also witnessed a General Science Quiz prepared by the Quiz Society of the college and conducted by Debobrato Sen Sharma and Akshit Goyal of the St. Stephen’s Quiz Society. 18 teams competed in a written preliminary round, out of which 7 teams moved on to the finals. The quiz had 42 questions coming from different scientific fields. The first position was obtained by a mixed team from Stephen’s and Hindu College, comprising of Ayan, Prerna and Rahul. However, an all Stephen’s team of Rabin, Sukrita, Surabhi bagged the second position. Talking about his favourite question in the quiz, Debobrato says, “We had a question where we told people about the characteristics of a spider and showed them a picture of the same. An additional fact was that the name of the spider was inspired by a character from the Jungle Book. Many people worked it out, despite seeing it for the first time.”

In Kapture, a digital imaging competition, students were given two hours to go around the campus, click photographs and then edit them on digital editing software to create their entry for the competition. 15 teams competed to create images under the theme The Dark side of St. Stephen’s. Andriyas A. Silas and Zoya Singh of St. Stephen’s won the competition in an entry that reflected towards an existing gender bias.

The Winning Entry at Kapture – Photography and Digital Imaging event.

Another fun event of NSF was ‘Absurd Theory’ – a competition about presenting theories and backing them up by scientific reasoning. The winning theory of the competition was presented by Mitrajyoti Ghosh of St. Stephen’s College. Mitrajyoti in his theory went on to propose that human kind existed on the planet before dinosaurs. Talking about absurd theories, he says, “Absurd Theory to me is about the fun in science. It shows that a scientific temperament can be applied to any situation. The fun of theorical science is that you don’t necessarily have to think of the big questions. Even the small questions can give you a lot of scope for imagination!”

Apart from the competitive events, the day also had talks on Wavelets and Quantum Mechanics in sessions with Dr. Prasanta Panigrahi of Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Kolkata and Dr. Sameer Sapra of IIT Delhi respectively.

Featured Image: Dr. Prasanta Panigrahi