ABVP Archives - DU Beat - Delhi University's Independent Student Newspaper

Campus Central

Delhi HC Rejects NSUI Candidate’s Plea Against DUSU Election Result

By DU Beat October 1, 2026

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday declined to entertain NSUI candidate Vijay Shankar Meena’s plea alleging irregularities in the DUSU presidential election, asking the university to decide his representation expeditiously.

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday, 30 September, rejected a petition by National Students’ Union of India (NSUI) candidate Vijay Shankar Meena challenging the result of the Delhi University Students’ Union (DUSU) presidential election. According to ANI, Justice Saurabh Banerjee directed the concerned authorities to examine Meena’s representation and decide on it within the stipulated time.

Meena, who contested for the post of president, had sought the quashing of the result declared on 19 September, in which Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) candidate Yash Dabas was elected with 24,576 votes. Meena secured 22,523 votes, leaving a margin of 2,053. The election recorded a voter turnout of 40.46 per cent across 52 polling centres, while independent candidate Deepanshu Shokeen won the vice-president’s post.

Filed under Article 226 of the Constitution through advocates Vimal Tyagi and Balaji Pathak, the petition reportedly alleged that certain election officials and faculty members took part in campaigning, contrary to the neutrality required under the Lyngdoh Committee recommendations and the DUSU Model Code of Conduct. It also raised variations in voter turnout across colleges and sought election records, including EVM and counting documentation.

According to LiveLaw, the court observed that the photographs submitted were undated and lacked particulars, and therefore could not be examined. Counsel for the university reportedly told the court that Meena’s representation, made only four days earlier, would be decided as expeditiously as possible, after which the petition was dismissed.

In a video shared by PTI via X, Tyagi said the petition was filed on the ground that professors serving as election in-charges had allegedly campaigned for ABVP and later raised slogans in its favour after the result. He said the petition “has not been allowed” by the court, but that the university had been directed to decide the representation expeditiously, adding that the petitioner would “avail the remedy available under law.”

Image Credits: Getty Images

Vidhi Ramchandani

vidhirmn2006@gmail.com

Keep Reading

Campus Central

ABVP Draws Criticism Over Participation in Miranda House Women’s Safety March

By DU Beat September 28, 2026

ABVP Delhi’s announcement of a “Chalo DU March: For Women’s Safety” from Miranda House to the Faculty of Arts on September 28 has drawn online criticism, with students questioning its participation in a protest presented by organisers as student-led and non-political.

ABVP Delhi’s poster stated that “ABVP and DUSU stand firmly” in support of the call for women’s safety and announced a march from Miranda House to the Faculty of Arts at 3 pm. The announcement came amid student protests across Delhi University following the rape of a 17-year-old girl at Aastha Kunj Park.

The Miranda House-led “Hum Auratein Azaad Hain” march was independently organised by students and clearly described as having no political affiliation. The September 28 march was open to women and queer participants and raised demands including improved street lighting, better public transport and safer access to public spaces.

The organisers also circulated a statement objecting to ABVP’s involvement. Social media users responding to ABVP’s announcement similarly questioned the organisation’s participation, pointing out that the march was student-led and urged ABVP not to associate itself with the protest.

The criticism extended to DUSU Secretary Riya Chhawdi, who said she would participate in the protest. In a statement shared online, Chhawdi said she was joining “not because of any political agenda” and not on behalf of a political organisation. She described herself as a woman and the elected female representative of DU, and said women’s safety should not be reduced to a political label.

Chhawdi also urged students to put political differences aside and participate for the issue of women’s safety. Her statement came as DUSU publicly supported the cause. Recent reports have documented separate ABVP demonstrations calling for stronger security measures for women.

The development has highlighted a distinction between the organisers’ stated non-political position and the participation announced by political student organisations. The discussion has since moved online, with students debating whether such involvement could affect how the protest is perceived.

Aarushi Chaubey
chaarushi2001@gmail.com

Image source: ABVP Delhi

Keep Reading

DUB News

DUSU Victory Processions Under Delhi HC Scrutiny As DU Asked to Respond

By DU Beat September 24, 2026

The Delhi High Court seeks DU’s response over alleged DUSU victory processions, reiterating concerns over electoral violations and the use of money and muscle power.

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday, September 23, sought a response from Delhi University over allegations that candidates who won the 2026 Delhi University Students’ Union (DUSU) elections took out victory processions despite a court order prohibiting such celebrations.

A division bench comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia was hearing an application filed by advocate Prashant Manchanda, who alleged that victorious candidates violated the court’s directions following the declaration of DUSU election results on September 19. The bench issued notice to the University and observed that the matter would be treated seriously.

The court noted that all 140 candidates who contested the elections, including those who emerged victorious, had already been issued show-cause notices pursuant to its earlier directions. Manchanda was directed to compile all relevant evidence and include it in a dossier to be submitted before the court.

The proceedings follow the High Court’s September 18 directions, issued amid concerns over alleged violations of the Lyngdoh Committee recommendations, the DUSU Code of Conduct and other election-related norms. The court had specifically directed that candidates, students, supporters or any other persons should not organise victory processions after the results, either on Delhi’s roads or within university campuses and hostels.

During Wednesday’s hearing, the counsel representing one of the candidates submitted that post-election celebrations could be difficult to control and pointed out that even dhols had not been used this year. The court responded that drums were not the central concern. Instead, it highlighted what it described as the “show of muscle and money power” as the larger issue.

At the same time, the bench acknowledged one improvement in this year’s election process, noting that there had been no reported defacement of public property during the DUSU polls. The court, however, remarked that “much needs to be done.”

The High Court’s intervention comes amid continuing judicial scrutiny of DUSU elections. Earlier, the court had warned that violations of election rules could invite contempt proceedings and had considered the possibility of imposing electoral damages on candidates and student organisations. It had also directed Delhi Police and DU authorities to ensure compliance with its orders.

The matter is now set to proceed on the basis of the evidence compiled by the petitioner and the response submitted by Delhi University.

Image Credit : Satakshi for DU Beat

Bishakha Gogoi

bishakhagogoi39@gmail.com

Keep Reading

Campus Central

DUSU Campaigning Turns Violent Near Arts Faculty

By DU Beat September 17, 2026

DUSU campaigning turned violent near the Arts Faculty in North Campus on September 17th, with witnesses reporting significant fighting and damage to posters and vehicles.

Campaigning for the Delhi University Students’ Union (DUSU) elections turned confrontational near the Faculty of Arts on September 16, the final day of campaigning, with reports of a clash involving campaigners and people travelling through the area.

At around 5 pm, ABVP supporters were seen campaigning near the Faculty of Arts, causing traffic congestion in the area. According to accounts from witnesses present, an altercation took place after a few occupants of a car approached the campaigners and asked them to clear the road or shift the campaign area.

The disagreement reportedly escalated from a verbal exchange into a physical confrontation. The occupants of the car were alleged by those present to have links with the NSUI, although their affiliation could not be independently established at the time of reporting.

The confrontation involved several individuals, with reports of physical assault and damage to vehicles. Witnesses also reported the use of objects, including wooden sticks, rods and PVC pipes, during the clash.

The situation subsequently spread beyond the initial confrontation. Campaign banners belonging to different student groups were reportedly torn down, while some vehicles and property in and around the area were damaged.

According to accounts from students present at the time, a group of campaigners also entered the Kirori Mal College girls’ hostel premises, where banners associated with other student groups were allegedly removed or damaged. Many of the groups were seen carrying sticks and pipes to clash with the other groups. A brief altercation took place between the group and a few people, where a jeep was allegedly damaged by the sticks. Students reported verbal exchanges and threats during the incident. A similar confrontation was subsequently reported in the boys’ hostel area.

The incident also raised concerns among students and members of the public who were recording the events on their phones. Some people present alleged that individuals attempting to record the clashes were confronted or prevented from doing so. Claims regarding the use of internet-jamming equipment could not be independently verified.

A journalist and cameraman from an independent media organisation were also present to cover the final day of campaigning. While recording the incident, the cameraman was reportedly confronted by individuals involved in the clash. The journalist accompanying him alleged that she was manhandled while attempting to intervene.

The sequence of events and the identities and affiliations of all those involved could not be independently established at the time of reporting. Further verification, including accounts from the student organisations, eyewitnesses, university authorities and police, would be necessary to establish responsibility for the incidents.

The incidents on the final day of campaigning have raised concerns over the conduct and safety of campaigning ahead of the DUSU elections. With multiple reports of physical confrontations, damage to property and alleged interference and harassment with those documenting the events. Questions are persistent regarding the circumstances that led to the clashes and the accountability of those involved.

Rajarshi Ghosh

rajarshi.817@gmail.com

Image Source: DU Beat

Keep Reading

DUB News

Delhi University Announces Strict DUSU Election Rules Ahead of 2026 Polls

By DU Beat July 17, 2026

Delhi University has announced a stricter code of conduct for the 2026 DUSU elections. It introduced tighter regulations on campaigning, expenditure, and campus defacement.

With the announcement of the upcoming DUSU elections, the university administration has released a detailed set of guidelines that all candidates and student organisations must follow during the election period. The rules draw heavily from the recommendations of the Lyngdoh Committee, which governs student union elections across universities in India.

Among the most significant changes is a complete ban on defacing university property. Candidates have been prohibited from putting up posters, graffiti, or wall paintings on campus buildings and other public spaces. The administration has instead directed students to use only designated spaces approved by the university for election publicity. Digital campaigning and direct interaction with students have also been encouraged over large-scale physical campaigning.

The university has also reiterated strict expenditure limits for candidates. Contestants are required to maintain detailed records of campaign expenses and submit them to the election authorities within the prescribed timeline. Any candidate found violating the spending cap or concealing campaign expenses may face disqualification from the election process.

To strengthen enforcement, Delhi University has constituted monitoring committees to oversee campaign activities across university departments. Election officials and college administrations will monitor violations of the code of conduct and disruptions to academic activities. Candidates found violating the prescribed norms may face disciplinary action in addition to electoral penalties.

The administration stated that the revised rules are intended to create a level playing field for all candidates while reducing environmental damage and ensuring that normal academic functioning is not affected during the election period. Students have been urged to conduct campaigns responsibly and in accordance with university regulations.

The announcement comes amid renewed attention on student politics in Delhi University, where election campaigns have historically witnessed extensive poster campaigns, large rallies, and complaints regarding campus defacement. By reinforcing stricter compliance with the Lyngdoh Committee guidelines, the university aims to make the 2026 DUSU elections more transparent, orderly, and sustainable.

Tarunima Tayal

tarunimatayal@gmail.com

Image Source: DU Beat

Keep Reading

Campus Central

ABVP Stages Protest Against Shortage of Seats for DU’s One-Year PG Programmes

By DU Beat July 17, 2026

ABVP staged a protest at Delhi University against the shortage of seats in one-year PG programmes, with the demonstration led by Aryan Mann.

The Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) staged a protest at Delhi University, drawing attention to the minuscule number of seats available for students seeking a postgraduate diploma after completing their fourth year. Their chief demand was that the total number of seats should be increased, as the current setup has “betrayed” the aspirations of the students.

DUSU President Aryan Maan, in a statement to IANS, said,

The university administration had announced that all students completing the fourth year, whether from honours or programme courses, would get an opportunity to take admission to the one-year course on the basis of merit. However, there are only limited seats for students who have completed the fourth year.”

Further highlighting the disparity between students opting for the conventional two-year route and those coming in straight after their fourth year, the ABVP chief stated,

Those who are willing to do masters for 2 years, they have more 4,000-5,000 seats; however, those who have completed their fourth year are only offered 1,000 seats.”

Another ABVP protestor, explaining the specific course at the centre of the protest and the demand being pursued to increase the total number of seats, said:

“The one course that has been increased in DU, thousands of students come from third and fourth year to enroll in that said course. However, the seats for MA are very low, so ABVP demands that the number of seats for the MA course be officially increased.”

The protest comes amid growing scrutiny of the one-year PG programme’s rollout, with the university’s official seat matrix listing roughly 1,068 seats spread across 45 programmes, a fraction of the number of students who stayed on for the additional fourth year. Notably, the intake for the one-year route is calculated as a percentage of each department’s pre-existing sanctioned strength rather than the actual number of fourth-year completers, a formula finalised only months after most students had already committed to the extra year.

Image credits: ABPlive Ground Report

Kaustubh Dwivedi

Dwivedikaustubh4@gmail.com

Keep Reading

Campus Central

Dr B R Ambedkar Law Internship Programme: Over 650 Delhi University Students Selected

By DU Beat July 1, 2026

The fifth edition of the Dr B R Ambedkar Law Internship Programme, launched by DUSU and Adhivakta Parishad Delhi Prant, has selected over 650 Delhi University law students for practical legal training in courts across Delhi beginning on 1 July 2026.

Delhi University Students’ Union (DUSU), in collaboration with Adhivakta Parishad Delhi Prant, has launched the fifth edition of the Dr B R Ambedkar Law Internship programme. 657 students from the University of Delhi have been selected, who will gain hands-on legal experience through placements in the Supreme Court, High Court, and district courts across Delhi.

According to sources, the programme received 964 applications from students of the Faculty of Law, Delhi University, and candidates were selected through an interview process. The orientation programme was held on 29 June 2026 at Hansraj College, and the internship begins on 1 July 2026.

This internship aims to provide students with an opportunity to work under the guidance of experienced advocates and legal practitioners, enabling them to understand how the Indian judicial system functions through practical exposure to court proceedings, legal drafting, and essential advocacy skills.

Kunal Chaudhary, DUSU Secretary, said that the programme aims to prepare students through practical legal training and build a strong foundation for their professional legal career. He added that this programme would motivate young law students to play a meaningful role in the justice delivery system and also deepen their understanding of constitutional values.

Sanjay Poddar, the State President of Adhivakta Parishad Delhi Prant, said that the internship is more than just a training programme. It is a platform for students to gain a closer understanding of the judicial system. He said that the organisation remains committed to mentoring aspiring young law students through practical exposure and skill development. He expressed confidence that the initiative would help shape a new generation of competent legal professionals.

Image Source: Instagram, Legal Chariot

Bishakha Gogoi

bishakhagogoi39@gmail.com

Keep Reading

Campus Central

JNUSU 2025-26: Left Unity dominates the Union

By DU Beat November 7, 2025

On the night of November 6th, election results were released, cementing Left’s dominance in JNU student politics as the alliance Left Unity swept the central panel. Unlike last time, AVBP was unable to get a hold of a seat in the central panel and especially in the councillor seat of School of International Studies (SIS) or School of Social Sciences (SSS) which it has previously won.

On November 4th, elections for the new Jawaharlal Nehru University’s student union (JNUSU) was held. Many student unions formed panels to fight in the elections, namely the RSS backed Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (AVBP), Indian National Congress Student Wing National Students’ Union of India (NSUI) and an alliance of All India Students’ Association (AISA), Students Federation of India (SFI) and the Democratic Students Federation (DSF) named Left Unity. Many smaller organisations and independent candidates also stood in the elections.

The counting began on the night of the 4th November and finished on 6th November night. A total of 5,802 votes were casted of the 9,043, 64% voter turnout. The alliance Left Unity swept all the central posts. For the president position, Aditi Mishra got 1,977 votes, around 33% of the votes, beating the AVBP backed candidate, Vikas Patel by 449 votes. The vice president Kizhakoot Gopika Babu won a staggering 3,101 votes, more than half of the total votes. For the general secretary Sunil Yadav secured 2,005 votes and Danish Ali secured 2,083 votes for the joint-general secretary.

AVBP which had won seats in the last election, was unable to make a comeback in the central panel neither in many of the councillor seats especially SIS or SSS which they had previously won. Asking a JNU student as to why this was the case, they opined that it was due to an increase of violence. They recalled that the SSS general body meeting (GBM) had turned ugly when people started fighting, using abusive and casteist slurs against each other. It turned violent when elected councillor candidates and the JNUSU President were attacked. Another factor that they said was when a FIR was lodged against the students who went to report the above mentioned incident. Due to these incidents the alliance Left Unity was able to consolidate its hold.

The votes being divided in the last election due to two different left alliances was, for many, a major reason as to why ABVP was able to consolidate a seat in the central panel. This time however left organisations were able to come together and form a single alliance. Critics have, however, pointed out that the alliance has sidelined many smaller organisations and accused them for slacking on student issues.

The results have cemented the Left Unity’s dominance in the university’s student politics and has marked a change in its strategy to organise, marking a significant shift from the previous election.

Image Credits: Times of India

Reva Rawat
revarawat2007@gmail.com

Keep Reading

Campus Central

DUTA Demands Action After Professor is Slapped by DUSU’s Joint Secretary

By DU Beat October 17, 2025

Delhi University witnessed an assault on one of their Commerce Professors, after he was allegedly slapped by DUSU’s Joint Secretary while being on duty.

A professor of Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar College, Mr. Sujit Kumar was allegedly slapped and assaulted by Delhi University Students’ Union (DUSU) Joint Secretary Deepika Jha and other members of Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), in the presence of police personnel on Thursday, 16th October. Sujit Kumar serves as the convener of the college’s disciplinary committee and is a senior teacher at Delhi University’s B.R. Ambedkar University.

The incident sparked immediate outrage in The Democratic Teachers’ Front (DTF), who claimed that around 50 students entered the college, alongside Aryan Maan, the DUSU President and Deepika Jha, the Joint Secretary, and ‘mistreated teachers, demanding the resignation of the disciplinary committee convener.’

The Democratic Teachers’ Front (DTF) issued a statement asserting that the committee was investigating recent incidents of campus violence involving students from different groups when the assault took place. The Delhi University Teacher’s Association in turn has written to the Vice- Chancellor demanding swift action and has urged the university administration to conduct thorough research and to take further measures.

The incident has drawn widespread condemnation from the university’s teaching community.

Even though Deepika Jha alleged that Prof. Kumar misbehaved with her, she apologised to the entire teaching community. The professor, however, rejected the allegations. Deepika Jha asserted that she was called to the college to address complaints of `misbehaviour and physical assault’ raised by the students against Prof. Kumar. She further accused the professor of being in an inebriated state and of making indecent remarks, constantly threatening her and of making her feel unsafe.

Aryan Maan, on his Instagram, implicated that the party showed up after a student was seen to be dragged by the collar by the professor in addition to him smoking within the college premises.

The Joint Secretary admitted to slapping the teacher but asserted it to be an impulsive reaction to his alleged `staring’, `verbal abuse’ and `provocation’. She expressed regrets over her actions but claimed them to be a concern for female safety on campus.

A DU professor, on the condition of anonymity, had given a statement: “A student from the National Students’ Union of India (NSUI) had won the president post in the college student council, and two other posts had been won by the ABVP. The NSUI student had allegedly been assaulted by ABVP members, and he had lodged a complaint against them.”

Prof. Kumar stated that he was forced to resign from his position, and the event took place after.

In an a statement, the incident was labelled as `ABVP-led DUSU hooliganism’ by the NSUI, who condemned the lack of action by the authorities despite CCTV evidence.

Anonymous

Featured Image source: Screengrab from CCTV footage

Keep Reading

Campus Central

Delhi University Palestine Solidarity March Turns Violent Amid Alleged ABVP and Police Assaults

By DU Beat October 11, 2025

A Palestine solidarity march at Delhi University on October 9 turned violent after alleged assaults by ABVP members and police. Student groups including Fraternity, MSF, AISF, Disha, and ASA condemned the attacks, calling them acts of suppression and intolerance. Similar crackdowns on pro-Palestine protests have been reported across Indian campuses.

A joint march in solidarity with Palestine, organised by the Fraternity Movement and MSF (Muslim Student Federation), a student wing of IUML (Indian Union Muslim League), on Tuesday, 9th October, turned violent after alleged assaults by members of the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) and the police.

The march, which began from Vijay Nagar at around 5 p.m. and was headed towards the Faculty of Arts, saw participation from student organisations including Fraternity Movement, MSF, AISF (All India Student Federation), Disha, and ASA (Ambedkar Student Association), along with several Delhi University students. The protest was held in Old Gupta Colony, and was described by participants as a peaceful demonstration before tensions erupted.

According to multiple protesters, members of ABVP, the student organisation affiliated with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), entered the march and began chanting slogans such as “Jai Shree Ram” and “Vande Mataram.” Protesters alleged that ABVP cadres threw eggs, pelted stones, and even struck a demonstrator with a helmet.

In a statement condemning the assault, Fraternity Movement claimed that ABVP members objected to the display of Palestinian flags. One protester recounted an exchange in which they were told,

“[J]handa lehrana hai toh idhar aao.” (If you want to wave the flag, come here.)

Several protestors accused Delhi Police, which was deployed to control the situation, of siding with ABVP. In a video recorded by Maktoob, a news organisation, the police were seen beating protestors, manhandling women and detained students. Many of the protesters who were women had stood in the front to ensure that violence wouldn’t erupt. A protester said,

“Instead of threatening or sending them (AVBP) away, they wanted to “control” the situation”

On October 9th at night, in a post by Fraternity Movement, the 8 detained students were released including 3 members Farhan Israil, Najwan, and Abdul Rashid of the Fraternity Movement.

Fraternity Movement, MSF and AISA have issued a statement condemning the attack on protesters by ABVP and the police. MSF and Fraternity Movement have labeled the attack as deeply intolerant and islamophobic. A statement by Fraternity Movement reads,

“This brutal suppression of a peaceful expression of solidarity with the people of Palestine exposes the deep intolerance and Islamophobia thriving within the institutions of this country.”

This incident follows a series of recent crackdowns on Palestine solidarity protests across India. On October 7, students at the English and Foreign Languages University (EFLU) in Hyderabad alleged that ABVP members disrupted their gathering condemning the genocide in Palestine, tore down posters, and verbally and physically assaulted participants. Earlier, on October 4, six activists were detained in Rohtak, Haryana, for organising a demonstration in support of Palestine.

This pattern of consistent disruptions of peaceful gatherings raises concerning questions on the ability to exercise ones’ fundamental right heralded by our constitution.

Image credits: Maktoob

Keep Reading