The Good, Bad and The NEP: A Far Dream?

The NEP is envisioned towards creating an inclusive education for all by bridging the abiding spaces in the society. Yet, it seems to just be a façade of progression. The policy is ought to introduce the much-needed practicality and inclusivity into mainstream education but what is the correct way to go about it? Is it going to be actual consideration of the voices of all the stakeholders or will it be a theoretical approach to a ‘practical solution’? 

The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 has a vision towards transforming the Indian education system into a global knowledge superpower. It lays down the veracious purpose of the education system, to develop virtuous human beings having the rational and critical ability, empathy and solicitude, creativity and the power to go beyond but what is the cost to implement this? Will this be uniform for each child living under the same sky or a question of ‘subjectivity’ would arise? 

NEP address to the practical knowledge and skills like carpentry etc but see now the things is that our government schools do not even have quality teachers how can you equip them all in such a small time frame, so first government should be focusing on ground development rather than looking on to the prosperity of the entire nation,

added Malvika Choudhary, a student from the Delhi School of Journalism.

The irony of this policy is such that it is a step towards changing the theoretical approach into practicality but the policy itself sounds too theoretical than pragmatic. While observing the NEP 2021, inclusivity is a major factor of the entire policy. Some provisions look like encompass all the sections of the society. However, in the actuality of this realm, it is only pushing the way towards widening the gaps of disparity. The question is not about if these provisions are good or bad but about the “tomorrow” that the nation is trying to build.  

The problem in NEP is that it scarcely mentions affirmative action in the form of reservation for the socially oppressed anywhere in the document moreover it also talks about financial autonomy for the government which will lead to a rise in fees and so more exclusion of the students.

Aman, a student from Ramjas College, and a member of Students’ Federation of India.

Adding to this, the policy emphasizes the need to set up a ‘Gender-Inclusion fund’. On the surface, it seems to be bringing an end to the unjust practices against the girls and transgender but as a matter of fact what is in it for them? Will it bring solace to the wronged genders or will it welcome even more adversities than it is already present? 

This fund will be set- up to provide equitable quality education to transgender students and girls, especially those belonging to socio-economically disadvantaged groups. However, this step would require transgender students to come out and identify themselves in the public eye. We are living in a progressive country but not progressive enough to even provide security to this section through penal laws. From a classroom to the roadside tea stall, slurs are normalized against trans people then how are we supposed to believe that a fund is going to solve these deep-rooted problems? Are we supposed to turn a blind eye towards the underlying issues and focus on the surface?  

A trans student dressed up as a boy for every single day until he finished his final school examination and secured a seat in a foreign land. It was then that he recognized himself as she/her. It took her nearly twelve to fourteen years to come out in the public eye. She came out only because she was leaving the country for her higher studies and this gave her a sense of security. Then, how are we supposed to accept the fact that by introducing a fund, by providing bicycles, provisions of sanitation and quality education, the long-lived stigma will come to an end? Is this enough to turn the thorns into roses when the country finds it normal to laugh them out? 

Certain aspects of the NEP might have long term detrimental effects, after lapsing the short-lived happiness. It is a good decision but not a thoughtful one. The gender inclusivity fund is a good start per se, but at some point, these students may be exposed to the vulnerability that our society hides. A system has to be incorporated that would not throw these students under the bus and would provide them everything from basic needs to quality education.

Sanya Gupta, a student of Kamala Nehru College.

Furthermore, the policy talks about introducing similar inclusion funds for other marginalised sections. These funds are in the talks for their holistic wellbeing in addition to equitable and quality education. These steps look good on paper but are they a promise to long-term happiness or just a fantasy of seventh heaven? Not to mention, how are we supposed to address the issue of ‘roti, kapda aur makaan’ on the pile of discriminatory laughter and societal stigma. On top of all these, a perplexing situation arises about the source of the funds. We live in a country with quite many marginalised groups. Who is going to keep a track of each fund allocated to each of these groups? Even if they are introduced, how is the question of transparency in terms of usage of the funds is going to be answered? These funds seem to be a wolf in sheep’s skin. From exposing to a greater vulnerability to a possibility of widening the societal gap, this policy needs to be rethought from the perspective of the people belonging to these groups. 

Besides a problematic implementation, it needs to account for all the tangibles that come along with it. The most quintessential stakeholders of this policy, the students, believe that the demerits of the policy might overpower the actual vision which in turn could lead to a massive failure if not addressed. Nevertheless, this policy might be the much-needed change to one of the largest education systems of the world but will it give us the much-needed solution to the underlying problems? 

Read Also: The National Education Policy 2020: A Dark Side?

Feature Image Credits: It’s Time

Ankita Baidya 

[email protected]


Journalism has been called the “first rough draft of history”. D.U.B may be termed as the first rough draft of DU history.Freedom to Express.