Tag

Women Safety

Browsing

Several female students at the Delhi School of Journalism and Miranda House had faced repeated instances of sexual harassment, as men deliberately exposed their genitalia, proceeding to perform vulgar and obscene acts in front of the first-year students.

 

Female students at the Delhi School of Journalism and Miranda House have reported multiple instances of sexual harassment. The first such incident was reported to have occurred to two first-year students of the Delhi School of Journalism on the 31st of December 2025, on Cavalry Lane. The students were on route to the Vishwavidyalaya metro station at around 12:30 pm when an unidentified man indecently exposed his genitalia to the students as he proceeded to masturbate in front of them. The students found the incident “alarming and deeply traumatising,” and fled the scene, fearing for their safety.

 

A similar incident was also reported outside Miranda House. On 15th January, four first-year students, while exiting the college campus, encountered a man in his late thirties masturbating in broad daylight near the bus stand, outside the third gate of the college. The students approached the nearby pink booth, where they were informed by the female officer that a male personnel would be called to handle the situation.

One of the students later stated, “The man continued the act and looked at us while doing it. It was extremely disturbing and distressing.” It’s also crucial to note that this occurred in the presence of a female officer. The students also contacted the women’s helpline. Subsequently, the male police officer also arrived at the spot and detained the individual. According to the police, the man was drunk and not in a stable state of mind.

 

The students stated that they did not formally inform anyone else in the college, except that one of them contacted a senior from the college ICC, who provided contact details of a lawyer for legal guidance, however, no FIR was filed. 

For our own sanity and well-being, we chose not to escalate the matter further. However, it’s really scary to walk that same path every day, and to think about what if he recognised us, stalked us, or came after us someday.”

Apart from the students involved, another girl was present who also noted the events. They also reported that a similar incident had previously occurred to a first-year student on a DTC bus, suggesting that such incidents could be recurring.

 

What is particularly concerning is that the incident took place in proximity to a women’s college, and near a bus stand, with frequent movement of women, children, and students from nearby colleges. The fact that such an act occurred in a public, highly populated space highlights serious concerns regarding safety and monitoring in the area.

 

 Yet again, on January 16th, 2026, just a day after the incident outside Miranda House had taken place, the same two students from DSJ would be subjected to a repeated event of sexual misconduct as an event identical to the first reoccurred, at the same location, once again in broad daylight.

One of the victims said,

The man made eye contact with us as he did obscene gestures in public. We are devastated and extremely disheartened because it feels as if our right to freely walk on the streets has been curtailed.” “It still disturbs me that he felt free to do this in public with no fear of consequences. How that man remembered to cover his face but not his genitalia is unbeknownst to me,” said the other.

 

The experience was far from isolated. Upon hearing about the events of December 31st and January 16th, several other students at DSJ reported having had similar experiences. First-year student Aastha Upadhyay stated,

Ever since I’ve known about these incidents, I’ve dreaded walking down that path or even coming to college for that matter, which is a shame because I quite like what I’m studying. I haven’t had a good night’s sleep because I keep waking up with the fear of a man’s presence in my room. It pains me to think about what more could have happened to them, to any of us. Of course, there are bad elements in society, against which we can try to be cautious on a personal level, but their normalisation should be intolerable.”

 

A complaint regarding student safety was brought to the college administration’s attention. However, as the reported incidents had all occurred a few feet outside the college campus, the authorities concerned had voiced that they had no agency to involve themselves in the situation. This led to the student body questioning the accountability of their institution. Students had approached the Pink Booth outside Miranda House seeking protection and justice. Unfortunately, personnel informed them that the booth only dealt with cases of theft or snatching. They were directed to the local police station to report any instance of harassment. The Pink Booth is supposedly meant to act as a safe space for women. First-year DSJ student Ananya Chaturvedi says that the Pink Booth succeeded in branding safety, but not in providing it. “A pink-painted booth alone does not empower women. It serves no purpose if its commitment to safety ends at aesthetics,” she says.

 

Parents are left worrying for the security of their children as such instances continue to occur time after time. The father of one of the victims stated, “Very concerned about the safety of my daughter as well as other female students travelling to DU North Campus for their regular classes…When parents entrust these prestigious and reputed universities with their children, they do so in good faith. They deserve reassurance that this trust will be upheld.”

Read Also: A Soaring Fire Hazard: The Alarming State of Fire Safety in Delhi University

Image Credits: Apoorva

Written by: Anonymous

In a recent press release, the University of Delhi (DU) released out a statement condemning the sexual harassment that occurred during Gargi College’s annual cultural fest, Reverie. 

In a recent press release dated 12th February 2020, the University of Delhi released an official statement condemning the sexual harassment that occurred during the college’s annual festival Reverie on 6th February 2020 and standing with the female students and employees of Gargi College in their fight against the incident. In the statement signed by the University’s Registrar, Professor Tarun Kumar Das said, “The University strongly condemned the hooliganism, trespassing and any other incident that violated the modesty of the students, and appealed to the law enforcement agencies to take strong action against the culprits.”

In the statement, the University claims that it sought action taken report from the Principal of Gargi College as soon as it heard the news regarding the incident, with the University’s Proctor meeting with Police personnel and requesting them to deploy policemen at the gates of every college on 11th February 2020. The Proctor also allegedly met with the Deputy Commissioner of the Police (North) and the Dean Students Welfare and Presiding Officer (ICC) of the University on 12th February 2020 at 3 pm to discuss the measures that were to be taken regarding the matter immediately.

The University insists that it is doing everything to harbour a sense of safety amongst students and ensure safe and secure academic campuses for the university and is at a constant vigil for the same. The University had also issued an advisory for all colleges and institutions associated with DU concerning the safety and security of its female students and employees on 10th December 2019 and had constituted a Committee on Women Safety and Security to strengthen the safety and security of female students and employees on 15th January 2020.

“The University reiterates its resolve time continue to work towards ensuring a safe and secure college life for female students in particular. The University appeals to all to take all necessary steps to ensure the safety and security of our female students and employees and respect their dignity,” the press release stated.

Students of Gargi College, University of Delhi, experiences hooliganism, trespassing, and sexual harassment during their annual festival Reverie that took place on 6th February 2020, due to poor administration and lack of proper security. Students of Gargi College have been observing dissent demonstrations against the act, and the College and established a Fact-Finding committee to find evidence and information for reporting it to official personnel. Student and teacher organisations of the university- Delhi University Teachers’ Association (DUTA), Delhi University Students’ Union (DUSU), Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthu Parishad (ABVP), National Students’ Union of India (NSUI)- have condemned the incident and held demonstrations across the campus in support of the female students and employees of Gargi College.

 

Feature Image Credits: Sanyukta Singh

Shreya Juyal

[email protected] 

 

 

 

TW: Rape

Many questions have arisen regarding the free metro and bus rides for women proposed by the Delhi Government. Read further to know more about another side of this coin.

About 5 months ago, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) Government proposed a scheme providing free metro and bus ride for women in Delhi. On 26th August, Delhi’s Deputy Chief Minister, Manish Sisodia presented a grant of Rs 290 crore in the Legislative Assembly during the monsoon session for this ‘free ride’ schemes. Out of Rs 290 crore, Rs 140 crores was allocated for DTC, and cluster buses and Rs 150 crore for Delhi metro.

“Public transport is considered the safest for women and keeping that in mind, the Government had decided that all buses and the metro rides will be made free for women,” Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, said. He also added that those who are willing to pay for the tickets would be free to do so. There are many women who can afford these transports and must refrain from taking the subsidy. This is to ensure that those who genuinely require this scheme may best benefit from it.

However, both men and women have questioned the true intentions behind this scheme. Though the scheme may sound appealing to many women, it does bring about the debate on gender equality and the question as to where to draw the line. “With all due respect, women in Delhi didn’t ask for a free pass to ride when they voted for Kejriwal Ji, they had voted for the safe environment promised to them,” Priyanka Chaturvedi, a National Spokesperson, wrote on Twitter.

She further argued in another tweet saying, “Hate to remind this, but Nirbhaya was gang-raped in a bus in Delhi. At that time the country didn’t protest over free rides for the women but for making the capital safe for its women to be able to take a bus or metro at any time of the day. Get your priorities right!”

“What is worse, once concession is given to one section of commuters, immediate demands will arise from more deserving sections, such as students, the handicapped, and senior citizens. The disease will spread fast to all other metros in the country, making them dependent on state governments for subsidies,” E. Sreedhan, more commonly known as Metro Man, wrote in a letter to PM Narendra Modi, requesting not to agree to the proposal as it would set “an alarming precedence”.

“The argument of the Delhi government—that it will reimburse the revenue losses to the DMRC—is a poor solace. The amount involved is about Rs. 1,000 crore per annum today. This will go on increasing as the metro network expands and with further fare hikes,” Sreedharan added.

The scheme also faced a whole lot of criticism regarding issues like overcrowding and a probable drop in the quality of services due to the erosion of DMRC funds. Instead of cutting water and power bills, Kejriwal proposed free metro to women, out of whom may well be able to afford the already-cheap mode of transport. Instead of improving security infrastructure and uplifting women’s safety, the government appears to be offering unnecessary expenses to be added to the State List.

Despite the probable “good” intentions of the Delhi Government, free metro and bus rides for women doesn’t seem to be the most viable proposal in theory or in action.

 

Feature Image Credits: Hitesh Kalra for DU Beat

Aditi Gutgutia

[email protected]

 

The Delhi Government, on Saturday, has sanctioned to desist the ‘odd-even’ car rationing scheme in light of the NGT poser regarding the rationale behind the decision. The policy was earlier announced for November 13 to 17 with the intent of depurating the smog-filled air in the city. A crisis situation emerged when the levels of particulate matter (PM) 2.5 and PM 10 entered the severe category. The government declared that schools must be shut down and the people were suggested to wear N95 masks as protection against toxic Delhi smog.

While stubble burning in neighbouring states and fire-crackers have been traced as the primary contributor to the dangerous levels of air pollution in the city, yet they are not the only contributor to the distress of Delhiites. Despite several warnings of worsening air quality before winter, the municipalities turned a blind eye to pollution caused by open burning of waste, and improper disposal of construction and demolition waste. This year, the East Delhi Municipal Corporation (EDMC) and the South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) did not issue a single fine for open burning of waste. The North Delhi Municipal Corporation, meanwhile, fined only 10 people.

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) pulled up the Delhi government for failing to act for the entire year until the air quality deteriorated to the extreme levels. “You tell us what is the purpose of implementing Odd-Even again? It seems you just want to reduce vehicles from roads” the court said noting the long list of exceptions. The Central Pollution Control Board has told the Green Court that two-wheelers cause more pollution compared to four-wheelers. Questioning the end result of banning cars when millions of two-wheelers are left unregulated. The court said, “If you are removing 500 cars from roads and allowing 1,000 two-wheelers, what purpose will it serve?” The court further remarked that the exemption from the Odd-Even scheme will be granted only to the CNG vehicle and emergency services such as ambulance and fire service while, earlier, this exemption pertained to women, two-wheelers and VVIPs.
Responsively, the Delhi Transport Minister Kailash Gahlot stated that ‘the Delhi Government could not compromise on the safety of women.’ He also accepted the fact that Delhi Government did not have enough public transport alternatives to accommodate over 60 lakh two-wheeler riders.’ Though the scheme has been called off, for now, the government may appeal for a review in the Green Court on Monday, to allow the car rationing policy with the previously practised exemptions.

Recently, the Delhi government’s had also decided to allow free travel for commuters in all DTC and cluster buses between November 13 and November 17, when the odd-even scheme was proposed to be implemented. This was done in order to encourage the use of public transport. It is unclear, now, whether such a decision will be implemented even after the suspension of the odd-even policy.

Experts, however, said there was a need for a long-term plan to reduce emissions. The Environment Pollution (Prevention & Control) Authority (EPCA) has issued a ‘Comprehensive Action Plan for Air Pollution Control in Delhi & NCR’ that enlists a combination of short, medium and long-term action for each source of pollution and indicates agencies responsible for implementation. A member of the EPCA and the director-general of the Centre for Science and Environment, Sunita Narain, said if the long-term measures already identified and suggested by the EPCA are not implemented, “air quality cannot improve”.

Image Credits: Hindustan Times

Varoon Tuteja

[email protected]