Delhi University’s new DUSU poll guidelines mandate a ₹1 lakh bond to curb defacement, sparking backlash over affordability and fairness from various student organisations.
Delhi University on 8th August issued a new set of guidelines that direct DUSU (Delhi University Student’s Union) poll candidates to endow a bond of Rs. 1 lakh at the time of filing nominations for any defacement or poll code violation. This comes amidst the advent of DUSU elections for the new session, which is expected in September.
This amount will be liable for forfeiture if the candidate or their supporters are found violating defacement norms,” the advisory issued by DU Registrar Vikas Gupta stated.
This move was met with significant backlash from various student organisations on grounds of being uneconomic for the common folk, especially candidates from relatively underprivileged backgrounds, and being “exclusionist” in nature.
Someone from a lower-income background may not be able to afford the Rs 1 lakh bond required for nomination, which could prevent them from participating despite their willingness,” Ronak Khatri, the incumbent president of DUSU, told PTI.
He urged the university authorities to hold candidates individually accountable in case of any violation by lodging direct fines instead of mandating them for all candidates in general.
We welcome the guidelines, but we oppose the provision that requires students to submit a ₹1 lakh bond. It is not convenient for students to pay such a huge amount. We will soon release our own guideline in response to this,” said ABVP National Secretary Sarthak Sharma.
All India Student’s Union (AISA) President Nitish Kumar supported the motive of curbing electoral malpractices; however, he raised questions about the monetary constraints that the guideline imposed.
We welcome rules that aim to ensure transparency and reduce malpractice. However, merely depositing a bond of one lakh rupees cannot prevent the misuse of money power. In campuses like JNU, elections are conducted without the use of money,” he said. “The volume of money power used in DUSU can only be curbed by placing stakeholders in a more informed position,” he further added.
He highlighted that during the Joint Proctor’s meeting, he proposed to democratise the election process through presidential debates, but he was met with no response from the authorities.
The directive included a range of guidelines with adherence to court orders and the Lyngdoh Committee, such as an anti-defacement affidavit at the time of admission and barring the use of loudspeakers, rallies, and roadshows outside designated “walls of democracy”. Violations may attract a fine of Rs 25,000, suspension, rustication, or even disqualification.
The results of DUSU elections 2024 were delayed by two months due to outrage over rampant vandalism committed during election campaigning by various student outfits and Delhi High Court intervention directing student organisations to restore defaced property.
Read-DUSU 2024: An Election in Waiting
Image Credits – Nabeera for DU Beat
Divyanshi Dusad
