Tag

reservations

Browsing

On 1 August 2024, the Supreme Court of India came through with a landmark judgement. The judgement makes sub-classification with the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes permissible, an issue that had been a matter of contention for a while.



The Supreme Court of India, on 1 August 2024, permitted states to create sub-classifications within SC and ST categories to offer wider protections to the most backward within these communities. The bench led by CJI Chandrachud reframed how the reservations may operate for the first time since 1950.  

 

India has historically been a place with rampant discrimination, infamously home to the hierarchical division of the Varna system. As is a secret to nobody, the Shudras placed at the bottom of the hierarchy were exploited by the rest, i.e., the Brahmans, the Kshatriyas, and the Vaishyas. This exploitation and social exclusion of the lower castes continued into the modern era, with social practices like untouchability being very prevalent in Indian society. It was in this grim socio-cultural environment that the constitution makers of India, with B.R. Ambedkar, being a Dalit himself, made the upliftment and protection of lower castes and tribes a priority. They did so by introducing reservations, which would guarantee a share of representation for these often socially deprived and neglected communities in institutional and lawmaking positions, as well as providing them with an adequate livelihood.


Reservation overtime has had adverse effects in various dimensions, in both positive and negative senses of the word. Some benefitted greatly from these newly introduced safeguards, while others were further pushed to the periphery by those at the apex within their communities. The uplifted ones, having gained emancipation from socio-economic exploitation, held on to these reservations, keeping them away from others, much more marginalised within those communities who could benefit more from reservations. It’s hard to imagine one giving up their privileges if it keeps on benefiting them, precisely the case present here.



However, the watershed moment turned out to be the ‘Indira Sawhney vs. the Union of the India case,’ which brought about the principle of the creamy layer or the exclusion of the economically well-off sections from reservation in 1992. This was, however, only applicable to the Other Backward Classes (OBC), and the SC-ST communities were left unaffected by the ruling due to them being deemed a homogeneous group. There have been a number of cases over the years trying to overturn the decision, notable ones being the EV Chinnah vs. State of Andhra and the Punjab vs. Davinder Singh cases. These attempts ultimately turned out to be unsuccessful on the grounds of homogeneity.


This was all to change on 1 August 2024 with a 7 judge bench ruling with a majority of 6-1 in favour of sub-classification and the introduction of creamy layer amongst the SC-ST.


Sub-classification does not violate the principle of equality enshrined under Article 14 of our constitution.

These were the words of CJI Chandrachud, who led the bench that delivered the historic judgement on Thursday. A great deal of emphasis was put on empirical data and facts to identify and exclude the deemed necessary.


There have naturally been protests and a great deal of civil unrest, albeit very expected. It’s often tough to come to terms with giving up your privileges, even if it’s for the greater social good. The reality of representation of these communities often ends up being a farce and is none more evident than in educational spaces, with the same old privileged bunch filling up the “representation quota,” which when all is said and done takes us nowhere. The ones at the apex often end up in positions of power and shape policies that end up being very one-dimensional, helping the already rich and pushing the already backwards even further into the periphery of social neglect.


Classifying these communities with empirical data and a looming census would allow the lawmakers a great deal of flexibility in shaping laws, taking into account the needs of the various stratas of our populace. In a nation with as much rampant and normalised discrimination as India, with certain social backgrounds. Case in point, “Biharis,”  having been given derogatory connotations, which as a society we should be ashamed of, it becomes a necessity that more is done to uplift the ones who actually are in need of it. Otherwise, we are going to be running in circles, going nowhere, and end up with the same sections in positions of power and stagnating the Indian society in the process, leaving us with a morally corrupt social psyche and an incompetent system. It’s almost as if not classifying would leave us with a society more homogeneous in educational spaces and positions of power than it already is.

 

Read also: SC Takes Up RG Kar Case Amidst Medical Community’s Outcry for Justice

Featured Images credits: PTI

Yash Raj

[email protected] 

On 15 May, a story covered by the Press Trust of India (PTI) revealed that teaching faculty from the University of Delhi wrote a letter to the Vice-Chancellor, Yogesh Singh in order to report the lapsing of Scheduled Tribe reserved teaching positions in some departments of Indraprastha College of Women. 

Delhi University professors have accused the college of “twisting the roster” in order to practically do away with ST teaching positions in the commerce and economics departments. In both the aforementioned departments, the positions have decreased from a singular vacancy in 2019 to none in 2023. 

As written in the letter, close to 10 teachers have expressed their concern over the issue and urged the University to take some action, 

It is a harsh reality of the current times where we see the various efforts done by administrators to oversee the category section in the context of recruitment blindly.

The Press Trust of India has claimed that their attempts to reach out to the administration as well as the principal, Poonam Kumaria have been unfruitful, due to the lack of response. Even the DU Beat’s request for a statement has been left unanswered. Reports in the past few years have pointed out DU’s failure to allot reserved teaching positions to SC/ST candidates, even though the University has had qualified and suitable candidates, a response that has been criticized before. Such discrepancies, however, have prevailed previously as well.

On 12 May, DU Beat itself covered an ongoing issue at Keshav Mahavidyalaya regarding teacher’s union protests following the alleged lack of adherence to reservation policy, in regard to teaching posts among other issues. Moreover, as recently as October 2022, the SC/ST/OBC Teacher’s Forum had expressed concern over the non-implementation of University guidelines when it came to reserving administrative and faculty vacancies in colleges across DU. The chairmen of the Forum, Dr Kailash Singh Yadav had said that while teachers were still given reserved spots at a later date, the same had never been done for the position of principal ever. 

 

Featured Image Source: collegedunia.com 

Read Also: DCW Seeks Report on IPCW from Police   

Reviewing the SC/ST Act 

 

Chaharika Uppal

[email protected]

Graphic Credits :- Sahil Jain

Every passing year, securing admission in good colleges is getting tougher and tougher. Not for everyone though. If you happen to belong to any of the numerous communities deemed to be underprivileged (SC, OBC etc), all the skill that you’ll require is that of correctly filing a form.

The reservation system has received fervent criticism from all corners but can a country which has historically discriminated against certain minority groups afford not to provide them with opportunities for bettering their status? Or is it that reservations are the wrong way to go about uplifting minorities.

This week, Juxtapose sets the jury out on whether the reservation system is good for the country as a whole. So what are you waiting for? Scroll down and voice your opinions.

Juxtapose: Are reservations in colleges justified?
Show of Hands:
Justified: 2
Not Justified: 8
The Arguments:

1. Thangchungnung Mangte, Not Justified
I do have a great respect for the founding fathers of our constitution and their empathy towards the underprivileged sections of our society who were discriminated and exploited for hundreds of years. However, if we want to help those people to be able to grow and improve their condition, the very basis of granting reservation should be on the basis of a person’s economic condition. Giving reservation to a caste, tribe etc. will only help those, who are already doing well. A poor dalit or a tribal hardly gets to use the benefit of reservation granted to his/her tribe or caste and instead it is used more by the sons & daughters of, let’s say for example, an IAS officer.

2. Vikas Jaipuria, Not Justified
The ideal situation should have been: Merit alone triumphs! Having sat on a hunger strike when I was in class 8 in AIIMS when this debate broke out in 2006, I have seen the agitation from close quarters. This is a paralytic policy decision, which is far from the principles of equality espoused by our constitution. Sure the weaker sections and minority should be uplifted, but providing reservation in higher education is not the correct means. The government should have created better infrastructure in primary/higher secondary schools in small towns/backward areas. It should have extended the benefit of its social schemes by bringing more OBC’s/SC’S/ST’s under its net. The true effects of this paralytic decision is more evident in DU – OBC’s/SC’s/ST’s from well of families are sitting in top colleges with less than qualifying marks, while hard working students of General category who slogged their ass in class XII are precluded admission (even if they fall short of cutoff by a small whisker!). And we all know in a country like ours where bribing public officials is a cakewalk, no wonder you can get yourself made a fake SC/ST/OBC certificate.

3. Ankita Mukhopadhyay (LSR), Justified
When Dr. B.R Ambedkar formulated the Constitution, little did he foresee the uproar that his policy of reservation for minorities would create once education and literacy became a prime concern for most households in India. I think reservation for minorities is justified, provided there is an income bracket to justify their need for reservation. Reservation has come into the limelight today because of the UPA government’s policy to give preference to the minorities in order to garner more votes. The issue of reservation shouldn’t be a politically contentious issue; it should be more of a moral issue.
People belonging to the Scheduled castes and tribes are still discriminated against today in the villages, and even if a person belonging to the SC/ST or OBC category manages to break the mould and succeed in the corporate segment or any other sector, he/she is always looked down upon by the general candidates as an academically weaker peer. I agree that there are many general category candidates out there who lose out on a seat because of reservation, and economically backward general candidates face a bleak future due to no government support for them, but we should also look into the historical origins of this caste problem. The government should change its policy, and instead of demarcating lower cut offs or marks for SC/ST and OBC candidates, they should evaluate them on an equal level, barring only the fact that they have a quota for themselves. One should look for a solution to the problem, not ponder over it needlessly. We should learn from our forefathers and not continue repeating the mistakes that they committed hundreds of years back.

4. Riddhi Dayal (Sri Venkatswara College), Justified
I think reservation was a justifiable means to be used in the scenario of the caste-system in India, and many people have actually benefited from the same. Therefore, to completely write-off reservation is unjustified. Many students had a problem with the fact that General Category seats would be reduced in number due to reservation, however, that was taken care of by the court order that stated that the total number of seats would be increased to incorporate reserved seats while keeping General category seats constant. Thus, I don’t think its really a big deal.
However, I’d like to clarify that I don’t believe reservation should be continued indefinitely. As with all policies, it should be in practice till one reaches the stage of emancipation of the downtrodden and then be discontinued.
The Verdict: Reservations are neither justified nor beneficial.