_ap_ufes{"success":true,"siteUrl":"dubeat.com","urls":{"Home":"https://dubeat.com","Category":"https://dubeat.com/category/admission-season/","Archive":"https://dubeat.com/2023/03/","Post":"https://dubeat.com/2023/03/29/lsr-invites-anurag-thakur-to-sports-meet/","Page":"https://dubeat.com/events/my-bookings/","Attachment":"https://dubeat.com/2023/03/29/lsr-invites-anurag-thakur-to-sports-meet/anurag_thakur_pti_1200x768/","Nav_menu_item":"https://dubeat.com/2023/02/04/72831/","Custom_css":"https://dubeat.com/2023/02/25/cheerup/","Wp_global_styles":"https://dubeat.com/2023/01/06/wp-global-styles-twentytwentythree/","Amp_validated_url":"https://dubeat.com/amp_validated_url/22973feacc9e9a77e35e467c51da5fca/","Wpcf7_contact_form":"https://dubeat.com/?post_type=wpcf7_contact_form&p=52312","Mec-events":"https://dubeat.com/events/yearly-on-august-20th-and-21st/","Mec_calendars":"https://dubeat.com/mec_calendars/masonry-view/"}}_ap_ufee Movie Review Archives - DU Beat - Delhi University's Independent Student Newspaper

Movie Review


Devi is a representation of absolute truth and an obsolete future, presented through nine women who share one common thread of past.

Priyanka Banerjee’s creation- Devi, is not a story, but truth brought into broad daylight. The film brings forth a shared truth of nine women from different walks of life. The setting is simple- a room filled with women. All seem to have engaged themselves- offering prayers, engrossing oneself in books, playing cards, trying to fix the television. The characters show the grim situation which is nothing but absolute truth. They seem to be engulfed in their respective coping mechanisms.

Bairi (Yashaswini Dayama)  switches on the television- a popular song plays on the screen- Jiya Jaaye Naa. but contrary to the romantic overtones of the song, it seems to be a statement- Jiya Jaaye Naa (unable to live). Absence of life seems to resonate through the chorus of the song. Whether it is the living condition inside the room or the past of the characters, both signify the inability to live.

Before the plot unfolds, the room itself reflects a rhetoric value. The characters repeatedly ask about the number of people to be accommodated in the room, they feel suffocated, indicating that the room has finite space. The electricity fluctuation further raises the issue of burden. The room can hence be seen as a concrete translation of an abstract concept- tolerance. The ability to tolerate is finite, just like the capacity of the room. Patience and tolerance seem to be at a tipping end as the doorbell rings.

The channel suddenly changes to a news channel wherein a case of sexual assault is embossed on the headlines of the television, however, before the details are revealed, signal is lost. The headlines create tension in the room but before the viewers can know further the doorbell rings.

Four minutes into the short film, the viewers realise that there are skirmishes sparking off between the women inside the room as the doorbell rings repeatedly. Shivani Raghuvanshi’s character proposes the need for a proper system, this is where viewers’ curiosities are dissolved as it is revealed that the women are rape victims and have met death. At the end of the discussion no conclusion seems to arrive. This reflects another reality- rape is rape, a criminal offence that cannot be measured or compared.

There is an unusual relation between the women- forced sisterhood that does not come natural but is forced through the past. They know the gruesome truth but fail to empathise. Banerjee draws a parallel here- between the characters in the room and those in the society. The lacking empathy mirrors the society- a society which is unable to realise the ‘lopsided’ side.

At the end, Kajol’s character has to remind the other women of the day they entered to sensitise them as she walks to open the door.

“Yaad hai jab hum aaye the toh kitne darein huye the. (remember how scared we were when we first came here)”

A child enters, barely five or seven. As she enters the room, a state of speechlessness engulfs the room, a state of speechlessness engulfs the space that has a deafening effect. Devi ends in a complete circle. When Bairi switches the television a reporter asks concerning questions and as Devi ends, there are equally concerning truths.

Watch Priyanka Banerjee’s Devi here

Although Devi is gut-wrenching, it has uncanny resemblance to Abhishek Rai’s Four, a 2018 short film. The concept of both the films are identical. The parallels are heightened at the end as the endings are nearly the same.

Watch Abhishek Rai’s Four here

Feature Image Credits: YouTube

Priyanshi Banerjee


Sam Mendes’s 1917, Oscar nominee and winner of two Golden Globes awards, is one of the best war epics out there. Read further to gain a deeper insight into the film.

Opening with a shot of two soldiers relaxing under the shade of a tree in absolute serenity, Sam Mendes offers his audience the only moment in the entire film where they will not be holding their breath. 1917 follows these two British soldiers during the First World War as they are given the impossible task to deliver a message in order to possibly save the lives of about 1600 troops who would be walking into a trap set by the Germans.

The most popularly acclaimed aspect of this blockbuster film is Roger Deakin’s excellent work of cinematography as he presents a visual gimmick, making it appear as if the entire film was taken in one single, long shot. Deakins, along with editor Lee Smith, managed to stitch together 8-minute long shots to such perfection that they go unnoticed by the common eye. This feature of the film arrests the viewers’ attention from deviating, keeping their eyes glued to the screen and their bums on the edge of their seats.

The movie appears as a third-person video game where the two soldiers, Blake (Dean-Charles Chapman) and Schofield (George MacKay) are your avatars and delivering the message is your mission. The only additional challenge here – the emotional stake, making you even more intensely engrossed and terrified.

The film also offers multiple picturesque sets and frames. Many stills captured are pictures worth thousands of words, with every little detail to be seen of great significance. The sets include 5200 meters of trenches, villages ablaze and lots and lots of corpses. Even with a lack of dialogue, especially towards the final 45 minutes of the film, the actors’ subtle yet vivid facial expressions, change in skin tones with the change in environment, brings about greater depth to the plot. In fact, in certain scenes even lack of expression altogether substitutes the need for dialogue.

Another crucial element of the film was its music composition by 14-time Oscar nominee, Thomas Newman. The soundtrack managed to perfectly follow the changing pace of the movie and create the required tension and terror. Instead of overlapping the melancholic mood of the film, the soundtrack complemented it. Newman managed not to overwork his magic by leaving long patches of silence creating a sense of apprehension among the audience, eager to know what would happen next.

Apart from its technical aspects, the film also introduces two new and relatively “unknown” faces to its audience- MacKay and Chapman. The two actors are, in a way, “not so special” in comparison to the supporting cast like Benedict Cumberbatch and Richard Madden. This allows the audience to view them as two ordinary soldiers with ordinary aspirations, giving them a more realistic picture of the war. The audience is also better able to relate to these characters.

Knitting together these various elements , 1917 proves itself to be one of the best war epics seen in the history of cinema. The 2 hour long film is an exciting journey for the audience that’ll leave them awestruck and equally content.

Feature Image Credits: Fandago

Aditi Gutgutia

[email protected]

It 2, the second installment of Andres Muschietti’s film series, based on Stephen King’s 1986 horror novel It hit the theatres on 6th September, 2019. For those, who expect to experience the utter terror they got when they read the book, reconsider that because you will be left disappointed in this drawn-out and barely terrifying movie.

It was the first novel I read which “wasn’t meant for children,” and to a young child of 13, the entire book was nightmare fodder for a month and the cause of one too many sleepless nights. As a horror movie aficionado, when I heard they were going to make an It movie again, more than a 2 and a half decades after the 1990 It miniseries, which was quite frankly atrocious, I allowed myself to get a little excited and the first It movie of 2019 did deliver to some extent. With the capturing of Pennywise the clown, the underlying tones of friendship, and lost innocence and childhood (while all fairly cliché), the film did draw me back to the book, and while not the perfect movie, did serve to give a chill down the spine. However, the second installment, was the complete opposite, failing to frighten and becoming a drawn-out and a tedious affair.

On a positive note, Bill Skarsgard put in an impressive performance as Pennywise, the Dancing Clown, bringing in all the creepiness you would associate with a murderous extraterrestrial entity that prefers taking the form of a dancing clown. The little cameo by Stephen King, as a snarky antique store shopkeeper, was a nice touch, along with hiring an actual comedian in Bill Hader to play the role of Richie Tozier. The movie didn’t rely on cheap and unnecessary jump-scares and focussed more on a sense of gradual terror and suspense, which it somewhat succeeded at.

The movie was incredibly drawn out, with the run time being 2 hours and 50 minutes. The run time would have been justified if the movie kept us on the edge of our seats. With the last hour being incredibly drawn out and boring, with two-three nearly climaxes eventually faded into nothing, it left me checking my phone every now and then, something I never do in a movie theatre.  Unlike The Shining, another Stephen King novel which was adapted into a movie with a run time of around 2 and a half hours, which succeeded in keeping an air of suspense and terror throughout the film, It 2 was unable to keep its audience hooked and glued to their seats.

Coming to the various manifestations of It to scare the Losers Club, most of the designs and animations appeared childish. They were more like a Goosebumps monster rather than corroborating with Stephen King’s raw and macabre writing style. I found myself smiling and chuckling because of the ridiculous designs some of these monsters had, probably not the reaction one should get while watching a horror movie, but sadly that was the case.

Some parts of the book were skipped, and while some should have been skipped. I particularly remember a showdown with IT and Richie, where Richie uses his humour to show he is not afraid, one of my favourite parts in the book and one which Bill Hader would have done well, buts oh look! It is not in the film. Another thing which this movie ignored was how when Stephen King told the story, it started from the main characters and slowly recalling their memories of the first time they faced It as children as they walk the streets of Derry, something which added a sense of suspense to the novel, and if the same approach was adopted in the movie series, it would have done it a world of good.

The experience of watching a film should be wholesome and enchanting, especially a film like It 2, which has a ton of expectations from its audience. After seeing the movie, I can safely say, It 2 is part of the losers club for movies, and not in the good and wholesome way.

Feature Image Credits: IMDB

Prabhanu Kumar Das

[email protected]


Hellboy director leaves us with a deep reckoning about what is true love and its manifestations. The film is also a story about the primal struggle between good and evil. It also underscores the importance of having a harmonious relation with nature and its patrons. But, most importantly, The Shape of Water teaches us how to love with carefree abandon, without fear and without malice.   Feature Image Credits: Forbes Sara Sohail [email protected]]]>


Malik Muhhamad Jayasi of Awadh penned a poem in the sixteenth century, glorifying the beauty of Rani Padmini. She, whose existence is itself a controversial issue, did not fail to enamour the readers of the poem and the spectators of the movie through the legend of her beauty and bravery.

After many contentions to the release of the historic movie Padmaavat, it was finally showcased on the 25th of January – almost two months late after the original release date. Sanjay Leela Bhansali is an artist of great taste and has a penchant for the historical Indian royal portrayals. From Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam (1999) to Bajirao Mastani (2015), this producer and director has never failed to awe the Indian audience. This movie is one of the most expensive movies Bollywood has ever produced – with a budget of over Rupees 200 crores.

This movie, Bhansali’s magnum opus was originally titled Padmavati, after the name of the poem Padmavat by Jayasi. The title was modified as the filmmakers have attributed their creative source to the fictional poem, and not history. The existence of the events described in this poem has little authenticity. Though Alauddin Khilji had won Chittor, during that period there is no mention of any character as Padmavati in history. Historians point that not even Amir Khusrau (prolific writer of Alauddin’s court) mentioned Padmavati and the ruler’s longing for her. However, Rajputs claim the existence of Rani Padmini of Chittor.

The entire cast has been terrific throughout the movie. Ranveer Singh played the tyrannous Alauddin Khilji, Deepika Padukone portrayed Rani Padmavati, and Shahid Kapoor depicted the King of Chittor Raval Ratan Singh. From the very first look of Padmavati, Deepika portrayed feminine delicateness along with Rajput valour with finesse. The onscreen chemistry of the King of Chittor and the Rani was missing but the grandeur of the couple and their heroism while fighting the tyrannous Khilji was portrayed perfectly. Alauddin has been portrayed as the oppressive ruler who longs for Rani Padmavati after he hears about her from the traitor of Chittor, Raghav Chetan. He contrived the Rajputs to possess the beautiful Rajput queen. After the foreseen defeat of the Rajputs, Rani Padmavati and the women of Chittor commit jauhar (self-immolation) for the sake of their honour. The very last scene has been applauded by many, as the queen stepped into the burning pyre in the entrance of the fort – marking a great sacrifice in the name of the kingdom.

Despite all high alerts due to the upheavals by the Karni Sena, this movie is worth the wait and money. It is an amalgamation of considerable hard work from all the artists involved and deserves to be thoroughly appreciated.


Feature Image Credits: India

Radhika Boruah
[email protected]


Directed by the brilliant Anurag Kashyap, starring talented actors like Vineet Kumar Singh along with Jimmy Shergill, Mukkabaaz had set itself up to high expectations. While Mukkabaaz stepped away from the norms of our film industry, it couldn’t really keep itself away from it. Within a few minutes of the film’s start, we see an aspiring wrestler Shravan Singh falling in love with Sunaina, who later becomes the love of his life. Her uncle, Bhagwan Das unleashes his torment on the couple but they manage to defeat him. Such a cliché model is mainstream in Bollywood since its inception. In the movie, Shravan’s love story becomes the plot and the fight against corrupt sports management becomes the setting. For anyone who despises such a cliché, the movie can become tough to watch.

Shravan Singh is a man who stood up for himself, and pursued his passion wholeheartedly. But, life is never easy for a person who does that. Bhagwan Das, the villian of the movie, was a disinterested trainer who used his disciples as personal help. When Shravan confronts him to focus on their professional training, Das’ ego decides to unleash a reign of terror over Singh’s life. Interestingly, at the end, Shravan’s love for Sunaina makes him give up wrestling, a passion and profession he had fought for (literally, and metaphorically).

Filled with several fights, the movie runs for over two and a half hours which can get exhausting for the audience. In an attempt to make it realistic, Vineet Kumar Singh followed a rigorous boxing regime to look like a boxer, who is fit enough to box for real. The film engages the audience with a pragmatic approach, steering away from the cliché of victory-of-good-over-evil.

The movie touches upon the oppressive politics of caste, class, and power in a subtle yet powering way. In one scene, Bhagwan Das gets beef delivered to Shravan’s trainer who is later pummelled into a coma by the rightist Hindu mob as an attempt to hinder Shravan from wrestling. In another scene, Bhagwan Das gets his niece married off for his own benefit, showing that marriage has become institution out of force rather than love. Impregnated with insidious commentary on the current societal issues along with the open criticism of the deceitful, and the crooked sports management, Mukkabaaz is definitely a must watch.

Feature Image Credits: koimoi.com

Varoon Tuteja

[email protected]

“Your hair. It looks like fire. And smells of cinnamon. I wonder what it will smell like when you burn.”

Inspired by the Salem witch trials of the 17th century, an American supernatural horror television series was created in 2014. Initially, it was titled Malice, to be later changed to Salem. The story follows the series of hearings and prosecutions of people accused of witchcraft in colonial Massachusetts. The preliminary hearings were conducted in several towns; the most infamous being conducted in 1692 in Salem Town. Witch trials paint the Puritans as hypocritical scolds; yet also embrace the notion that there really were witches operating at the time, which makes their capital punishments seem a little less crazed and paranoid. Never mind that it runs counter to the rather duller historical record and lessons learned about the true nature of witch hunts. Here in the 21st century, science and reason rule, but in a world of sorcery, clinging to rationality just makes you stupid.


Having prominent elements of gothic drama, the show stars Janet Montogomery and Shane West in the lead roles of Mary Sibley and John Alden. The story opens with Mary even under unyielding laws regarding fornication, facing an unwanted potentially fatal pregnancy courtesy of her lover, Captain John Alden. A pact with a sorceress resolves her problem, but as we can see when the story flashes seven years ahead, the innocent Mary we initially met has been sacrificed along with the child in the wilderness. Alden, inevitably, saunters back into town after years at war, complicating life for the now-married Mary, whose powers are certainly formidable, even if it’s not clear to what end they’re being used. Married, Mary is the new ruler of Salem. Her unnerving powers crushed the existence of her so-called husband, the head of Salem. Her sorcerer servants and the land of the dead consecrate to her powers. The townspeople are haunted by the witch hunt, wherein every now and then an innocent person is caught to be a witch.

Meanwhile, the witch-hunting Mather is crusading against this sulfurous threat, even if like some prominent modern-day religious leaders, doesn’t always practice what he preaches. Subsequently, Salem is afflicted by a terrible plague and a witch war was drawing close: the consequences of the Grand Rite of the witches. Mary is united with her son Oliver who is possessed by the Dark Lord, after the countless raising the devil in the form of a child. Mary died saving the life of her love, Captain Alden. But demolition of the Puritan values and the destruction of Salem had to be put to a stop.

So, binge the three seasoned series to know the rest!



Feature Image Credits: www.bsnscb.com 



Radhika Boruah

[email protected]

Directed By: Alankrita Shrivastava

Cast: Ratna Patak Shah, Konkona Sensharma,  Aahana Kumra, Plabita Borthakur

After a long battle for the release of this ‘lady-oriented’ film as proclaimed by our beloved Central Board for Film Certification (CBFC), Lipstick under My Burkha released on Friday with an ‘A’ certificate, a few bleeps here, and a few cuts there.

But right off the bat, I will say that the battle and the wait, both, were worth it. Set in Bhopal, it chronicles 4 middle class women who all have different wants – the want to start a business, to work outside of home, to sing and emulate the clothing styles of her American pop idols, to attend swimming classes, and so on. Then there are the reasons why the movie was termed “women’s fantasy above life”, as in the things that cannot be realistically achieved – the desire for sexual and other kinds of freedoms and liberties of their own bodies and minds. This may come in the form of wearing jeans, reading erotic novels, or going to a party and smoking and drinking; which were not only shown to be the ways to freedom, but personal choices that the individuals made.

The larger and previously untouched point in the realm of Hindi movies is made here; that women also have desires (even sexual (!)) and that in our society, which is only inclusive but not limited to, a ‘certain community’, these desires are brutally supressed, mocked, or not even acknowledged. Each woman’s story is unique but the common thread exists in the form of real life societal blockages that stop them from achieving any fantasy they dare to dream about.

This was a movie that did not force women to start a revolution and overthrow the patriarchy. Instead, it left an ambiguous ending. Nothing in the ‘audio pornography’ or the scenes is something that most adults with internet connections have not seen or heard. Then what was the controversy for? I believe the answer lies in what one of the characters asks in the film, ‘Hamari azaadi se aap itna darte kyu hain?’ (Why are you terrified of our freedom?). I guess that’s also why some men in the movie hall laughed at the dramatic, definitely not comedic, scenes and made innuendos loudly – fear is often repressed with laughter and the female perspective being shown on the screen had to be repressed, made powerless with louder laughs to underscore its importance. This experience itself was a good case for why such films need to be made.

The portrayal of the everyday lives of these women shifted with ease from poignant scenes that are accompanied with tears and frustrations at denial of freedoms; to comic scenes and those of enjoyment, with a lovely background score and songs that adds a nice touch to these moments.  Konkona Sensharma and Ratna Pathak Shah sink completely into their characters, expectedly, and newcomers Aahana Kumra and Plabita Borthakur match them with their acting prowess. The women shine bright with their complex characters that battle inner turmoil and the fight against the reality of their situations. Revealing greater details about the plot will result in spoilers that will dim the experience of watching the film first hand, which I believe should be done as soon as you can. Do it purely for the song Le Li Jaan, which basically serves as the spirit of the movie with its peppy music and the following sombre lyrics, ‘Le li Le li jaan jaan jaan jaan, bina pooche haye haye’ (‘they took our lives without asking us).


Feature Image Credits: timesofindia.indiatimes.com

Rishika Singh

[email protected]


DIRECTOR: Anurag Basu

CAST: Ranbir Kapoor, Saswata Chattopadhyay, Katrina Kaif, Saurabh Shukla and others.

DURATION: 2 hrs. 42 mins

GENRE: Musical drama

Jagga Jasoos is a simple movie that tickles your funny bones along with knocking at your sentiments, making you teary-eyed quite often; with a strong message in its undercurrent.

Set in the backdrop of the Purulia Arms Drop case in the district of Purulia in West Bengal in the year 1995, the movie is of two loners; who resort to each other for happiness and the relationship of father-son merging them.

Having grown up on Sherlock Holmes and Feluda, Jagga (Ranbir Kapoor) has a thing for solving mysteries and has aided the local police officer (Rajatava Datta) on several occasions. Despite having speech impairment (stammer), his brain works at the speed of a bullet train while connecting the dots.

When he sets on his journey to find his father (Saswata Chattopaadhyay) who had left him years ago, he is accompanied by Shruti Sengupta (Katrina Kaif), an investigative journalist from Kolkata and the most “giri-huyi” (pun intended) person in the entire film. While Ranbir excels as an actor yet again, the comic timings of Shruti (Katrina) prove to be hilarious and also drive the film. Even the evil intelligence of the officer (Saurabh Shukla) contributes to it.

The movie is in a lyrical format (similar to that of ‘The Sound of Music’) which embellishes the story even more; including Tukka Laga and Bad Lucky to name a few. The story, however, snowballs into a much larger issue during the second half. This is where the plot tends to lose its pace but still remains well-managed.

If read between the lines, the entire movie talks about the futility of war and portrays how and why it is being kept alive by the nations today who feed off it. Anurag Basu excels as a director with an amazing vision and the guts to paint such a truth on the canvas of relationships without a drop of brutality and with the power of innocence.  Furthermore, the ostriches, zebras and Jagga’s cycle tend to transfer you to a land of wonder and definitely justify the movie as a Disney production.

Overall, the film succeeds in striking a chord while the music by Pritam and especially the lyrics by Amitabh Bhattacharya seem to come straight out of the heart. The best part about the movie, however, is that it cuts across all age groups.

While Jagga continues his tryst with mysteries, you have to go to the theatres and watch ‘Jagga Jasoos’ in order to decipher the meanings.


Image Credits: India Roundup


Shrija Ganguly

[email protected]

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, is a must-watch for any movie fanatic, Potterhead or not. Its fitting score and enveloping camerawork draws the audience in, and keeps them there on the edge of their seat with a cohesive plot. The cast is directly reflective of the characters’ personalities, a feat for which the Harry Potter movies are well-known. Eddie Redmayne plays Newt Scamander, a British wizard who wishes to educate the wizarding world about thousands of magical creatures and their properties. He has kind eyes and a concerned demeanour while he searches for his escaped beasts. His caring and selfless nature is reflective of Hagrid’s, a similarity which Potterheads cannot overlook. Characters such as Tina and Queenie Goldstein, Jacob Krakowski, and Credence, are surprisingly fleshed out, giving the audience a chance to connect to them and appreciate their humanity. On the other hand, Mr Graves provides an antagonistic character, moving the plot forward with his less-than-noble actions. Most of all, the magic is unforgettable. The movie starts off with Hedwig’s theme, bringing with it a sense of familiarity and of home. The creatures are full of personality, each having their own charm. Their brilliant colours and extraordinary size, coupled with their names and their habitats, are reminiscent of the inherent magic of Hogwarts. It is impossible to not feel at home with the protagonists, especially for Potterheads. But even if you are not an avid Harry Potter fan, you will enjoy the movie for its thrill and its characters, and perhaps be sucked into the Potter universe at last. A must-watch of the winter season, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is a stunning flashback into the wizarding world we all love, and a brilliant adaptation of a book that is essentially a manual rather than a novel.     Image Caption: Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them Movie Poster Image Credits: visitdunfermline.com     Vineeta Rana [email protected]]]>