Tag

Surveillance

Browsing

Ashoka University students protest new security rules. The measures reinstate the surveillance measures that ignited mass protests in January 2025, highlighting the precarious state of student dissent in the country.

On July 17, 2025, the Ashoka University Student Government (AUSG) posted a public statement opposing the university’s new security rules for the upcoming semester. These rules will come into effect from September 17, 2025, and apply to all students attending the summer term. The new rule says that anything larger than a wallet or purse can only be brought through Gate No. 2. Further, the students must get their bags scanned every time they enter campus.

The Student Government has strongly opposed this move. They say students were not properly involved in the decision. Although a Standing Committee was formed last semester to discuss such policies, the student representatives were treated as “audience.” Their votes were not counted. Later, they were also left out of important meetings and were not informed about the final decisions.

This is not the first time such rules have led to controversy. In January 2025, Ashoka students held a major protest against strict surveillance measures on campus. The administration had introduced sudden room inspections, searching of vehicles, belongings of taxi drivers and family members on move-in days, and increased monitoring under the claim of tackling substance use. Hundreds of students joined the protest. The movement eventually forced the administration to form a Standing Committee to include students in decisions that affect their everyday lives.

Now, students feel those promises have not been kept. In the latest statement, AUSG pointed out that:

The distrust between the Administration (especially the Residence Life Office) and the student body has increased exponentially in the past semester. The office has subjected students to punitive measures, including citing exceptional clauses of the Residence Life Policy to conduct invasive “inspections” in the residence halls while breathalyzing and subjecting students to urine tests before addressing their health concerns when they visit the infirmary. The reimposition of the invasive security protocol risks making the situation worse, discouraging students from accessing the campus health resources, fearing disciplinary action against them.

The Student Government said that better, non-punitive solutions were suggested by students and faculty, including the Ashoka Behavioural Insights Team. But these were ignored. They believe that the new rules could make students feel watched and unsafe, instead of supported. The statement ends with a call to action. The AUSG reminded students that similar surveillance measures had led to Ashoka’s largest-ever protest earlier this year. AUSG calls out to students, saying:

We urge you to stay vigilant and conscious, as this is not an isolated event and it certainly is not a matter of a minor inconvenience.

Read Also: Student protest in Ramjas College against the sexual harassment charges on Prof. Dhani Ram violently disrupted by ABVP

Featured Image Credits: swarajyamag.com

Juhi Bansal

juhibansal1606gmail.com

The second General Body Meeting (GBM) of Lady Shri Ram College (LSR) held on 26th August 2019, was centred around the college’s decision of installing CCTV cameras on the college campus. Mixed opinions surfaced as the event unfolded.

LSR witnessed the second GBM for the current academic session on 26th August 2019. After receiving great response from students as witnessed in the first GBM which discussed the change in the syllabus and its effects, the second GBM revolved around the recent step of the authorities to “put CCTV cameras in a huge number inside the college spaces”.

The discussion, initiated by the Students’ Union, put into light the issue of installation of CCTV cameras. As the meeting progressed, an enlarged spectrum of opinions was put forth. Two majorly conflicting opinions emerged as we asked the students about their take on the issue.

The first side brings into light the positive aspects which would follow if the college takes the step. This argument was supported as the students talked about the enhanced security and supervision in and around the college. It was further added that the CCTV cameras would reduce underlying violations and, in a way, would establish
transparency. Cameras would also serve as good sources of evidence collection in case of an incident or mishap of a severe turn.

A student who did not wish to be named said, “My first day of college did not turn out to be a delight as I wasn’t informed about the infamous back gate. I do not wish to say what happened but harassment does lurk around the back gate area. I would definitely feel safer if cameras are installed and hence, I support the move.”
Another student from LSR, Arpita, pursuing English Literature, said, “I would say somewhere or the other, students would be agreeing to it, (my remark is) not a direct attack on the facilities of the college, but the hype created for CCTVs is not worth it.” She further added, “Cameras can be used in a strategic manner to take into account the security of the students as well as the faculty, keeping in mind that right to privacy is not curtailed.”

On the other hand, some students did not support the decision of installation as they considered it as an invasion of privacy and not a very viable way of allocating the funds. Royina Chhabra, a first-year student says, “It is quite absurd that the college is concerned more about installing CCTV cameras inside the campus, whereas we all know the back gate is the place which needs more security measures and especially placement of police vans. CCTV cameras are something very secondary and not the need as of now. We have other things to focus on like sports equipment, more chairs, and better infrastructure.”

While we also see a leeway as some students suggest that the installation should be at places which are ‘strategically sound locations’, meaning the locations which walk along the demarcation of privacy and security. “In this way, funds can meet both ends, the near to death, panting fans, and the security concerns, both can be resolved hand in hand,” says a student who wished to remain anonymous.

DU Beat tried reaching out to the Students’ Union and the authorities, but received no response as they state that “matters are underway”. As the GBM progressed, a clear outcome could not be induced. Rather, it was put forth that the upcoming GBM would again draw light upon this very issue. It was further added that a petition or form would be circulated to the students to take into account their mandate. A concrete answer to the question of the conformity of installation of CCTV cameras and its judiciousness remains unanswered.

Feature Image Credits: Lady Shri Ram College Website

Priyanshi Banerjee

[email protected]