Author

Siddhi Goel

Browsing

A few days ago I was watching the popular comedy serial “Comedy Nights with Kapil” while having dinner. Though I did not find the show particularly amusing, it did bring a smile on my face at some points.

However, what really came across to me while watching it was the sheer sexist approach that Kapil Sharma, and most comedians have in creating punch lines to make people laugh. Not to undermine the talent and hard work Sharma has put in reaching this level, but their struggle is not a justification to the kind of jokes they make. For example, in the particular episode that I was watching, Sharma was seen as making jokes on the appearance of his wife, that how even after repeated attempts in make up her face was still as ugly. Sharma then proceeded to talk about the hideous shape of her lips and her unruly smile. Although the Sharma’s impeccable timing and dialogue delivery makes us erupt into a kind laughter of pity, on a deeper introspection it is reflexive of many problematic deep seated notions.

The body of the female is always more attractive than the body of the man, because the gaze is always male. It is this gaze of man which makes women especially prone to falling prey to arbitrarily defined definitions of beauty. Conventionally, it is the men who have decided what constitutes a beautiful woman and put restraints on her movement, because the “honor” needs to be “guarded”. A beautiful woman is like a trophy that a man installs in his house and subsequently prides himself on possessing her in his social circle. Thus, the embarrassment of not having a woman beautiful enough is expressed through the nervous laughter in Sharma’s punch line. Because the first requirement of being a socially glorified woman is not work, is not intelligence, its beauty. Madhubala is referred to more as the “Marylyn Monroe” of Bollywood, than the exceptional actress in Mughal-E-Azam. Katrina Kaif might not be the best actress around, but she will continue to star across A-listers as the only thing media notices about her dresses and make up.

Sharma’s jokes on her wife’s appearance, though might appear casual at the overt level as each one of us indulges in soft humor revolving around each other’s appearances, but somewhere down inside all of us have fallen prey to capitalist construction of perfection and the need to ridicule those who don’t fall in that category.

Image Credit: www.en.wikipedia.org

I do not watch Comedy Nights with Kapil, not FIR, or any other comedy serial that comes on Indian Television today. I find most of them low on content and high on antics that serve no purpose. Therefore, most of the weekends find myself going back at the episodes of “Khichdi” and “Sarabhai V/s Sarabhai” to revisit the time of good Indian Comedy.

“Office Office” starring the brilliant actor Pankaj Kaapor in the lead role as Musaddi Lal, the distressed common man instantly struck a chord with the masses. One of the best satires on Indian bureaucracy and administration, the show managed to highlight the shortcomings of the officers , and making the audience simultaneously laugh. The characters of “Patel” and “Pandey ji” instantly became a part of household vocabulary.

m

“Khichdi” with its diverse characters with outlandish traits was always a treat to watch. From the voracious eater Bhavesh Kumar, to the incessant complainer “babuji”, from the dumb Praful to gossip queen “Jaishree”, all of these people always managed to bring a smile to my face. “Khichdi” was the amalgamation of various silly but kind-at-heart characters who established a connection with the Indian masses because of their simplicity and “typical Indian family” image. Set in a gujarati background with equally gujarati idiosyncrasies, it made “bade log” and “praful tu to gadha hai” a part of common usage.

 

12

Then comes my personal favorite- Sarabhai V/s Sarabhai. A satire on the elitism of the high class society, Sarabhai never ceased to make me double up with laughter. Be it Rosesh’s poetry or Monisha’s “middle classiyat”, Dushyant’s obsession for machines or Maya’s narcissism , the show was one of the most realistic sketching of the present society.

image and gif courtesy:tumblr.com

Sushma Swaraj, the leader of opposition in the Lok Sabha gave a lecture on the “Role of Opposition in Democracy” on the 2nd of August, 2013 at Campus Law Centre, University of Delhi. She was greeted by a long applause and series of whistles by the gathering after which she began talking about the functioning of a democratic government and how the ruling party and the opposition party together strive to create a better society.

Swaraj also talked about how it is the responsibility of the opposition to create sufficient checks and balances in the system and keep the ruling party on its feet. She moved on to highlight the government’s mistakes in tackling cases of high sensitivity such as the Bhopal Gas Tragedy, tackling corruption, etc. In light of the apparent divide in BJP as far as the position of Modi is concerned, Swaraj’s lecture comes across as a political tool to paint a very content and united picture of the insides of the party politics.

The audience, despite the big name did not comprise of a large number of people. Sushma Swaraj ended by saying that all that BJP has done till now and will continue doing, is only and only in pursuit of greater good and nothing in pursuit of self interest.

Here is the video of the entire speech:

Image credit: Vatsal

Many a time we see people reflecting upon their college life and how it was a turning point in their lives. Wherein, a large part of the ideologies they later formed found their bed rock in the events in which they participated in, in their college period.

The life of a college student is diametrically opposite to its predecessor that is school. While school remains a sheltered cocoon where students are given basic education in various disciplines, college becomes the place where we eventually specialize in one of them. College therefore becomes a marker of the identity of a person we are yet to become. As a result of which, whatever we do in our college (apart from getting a degeree) form a significant part of shaping our identity. This is especially valid in terms of formations of ideologies, and college is the highest likely place where “patriarchal” and “extremist” and “conformist” become part of popular abuses, and being “anti establishment”, or being a “feminist” becomes your entry pass to the elite group of “jhola wala” social activist whose weekend outing is a protest march at India Gate and who are seen more frequently giving lectures rather than attending one.

The education system in India is such that the school remains that part of the education system which teaches facts and figures and the analysis of those “facts” comes only in college, where the ethos is much more liberating. While in other countries students start writing research papers from high school itself, such activities in India usually find their beginnings only in college. Subsequently, college becomes a platform for a  considerably huge change in the way we think.

Students, especially of humanities courses such as Literature, History, Political Science, Philosophy, are the ones who’re exposed to the maximum amount of theories as far as syllabus is concerned, and a questioning of existing social norms and an impending doom of being kicked out of your house because you’re too “modern” for the family norms follows suit. Students start identifying major loopholes that were earlier e\being seen through the prism of normality. For example, a girl might not want to change her surname after marriage because taking the male’s surname is inherently patriarchal in nature , while for others, changing their surnames continues to be a romantic idea. The girl might question the nature of marriages, the nature of late night curfews, the idea of “an ideal household woman” and many other things. And this goes for men who’re feminists as well.

Similarly , owing to the severely politically charged atmosphere in universities, more so in DU, students often turn anti establishments, rejecting every form of bureaucracy and become active student activists. Many leaders of today, like Madhu Kishwar were active in student politics. Most leaders adopt socialist communist ideologies, and actively start writing against the exploitative policies of the rich. Many start their own political parties, NGOs, etc. A large number of students these days also form their own start ups after graduating, though this is not owing to shifts in political ideologies.

College, hence becomes place where you’re exposed to a lot of “isms” and you turn into many “ists” and carry forward those ideologies till a later part of your life, where they give a major contribution to the kind of work you do, and not something that you leave behind in those long gone classrooms.

The orientation for first year students who’ve taken admission in Hans Raj College was held on 22 July, 2013. As the tradition goes in this college, the session was started with a havan, to wish prosperity and development to the college and its students for the following year.  This was followed by a hymn sung by the college music society Swaranjali after which there was a welcoming speech by the professors who introduced basic details of the college.

The program proceeded with the ECA students show casing their talent. There were performances of Kathak, Bharatnatyam, along with melodies where music societies showed their magic.

The college principal MR. V.K. Kwatra then gave his address to the gathering. He gave a brief description of the history of the college, its establishment and the experience of being in the college. He talked about how Hansraj College is one of the finest colleges in the country and has produced people like Shahrukh Khan, Navin Jindal, and scores of IAS officers and bureaucrats.

The principal gave the students tips on time management and dedication and wished them luck for the year.

“I found the principal’s speech very motivating. He gave us important tips on how we need to continue to strive for excellence and utilise college life to the fullest.” says Swarnika, a first year English (Hons) student.

dinesh singhRespected Mr. Dinesh Singh,

This letter is to congratulate you on your relentless pursuits to making Delhi University a world class university. I am fully aware that due to the “hurried” changes in the degree program, you have received more brickbats than bouquets, but this letter is an exception.

It has been around three years that you’ve been elected the VC of the best university in India. In your interviews you’ve maintained that the preparations for implementing the four year undergraduate programme (FYUP) started as soon as you held office. Even then you made the smart decision to implement the semester system, just to replace it with FYUP after two years. Your uncanny future planning is admirable, sir.

You’ve claimed rather vehemently that FYUP is going to increase the employability of students. I fully trust you when you imply that by studying non-core subjects more than core subjects in the span of 4 years, a pass out will be the preferred choice. I also believe you that by giving multiple exit points and still “benefiting” from the studies, a drop out with a B.A degree will get a job without really specializing in his 2/3 years of study.

Sir, I appreciate your concern for the students who wish to study in U.S.A after completing their graduation in India. Your decision to make structural changes (increasing the span from 3 years to 4 years to suit the USA model) rather than focusing on the quality of the structure (the quality of core disciplines, lessening the burden of non-core subjects) is admirable. Because you see, spending a year extra without learning extra is the goal, USA and all.

I understand you value quality education, that’s what FYUP is all about after all, isn’t it? Therefore I applaud your decision of making students study the disciplines that are in no way related to the field they want to major in. The fact that you’re making an English major aspirant from humanities background study biochemistry perfectly makes sense. Because the value of science foundation courses is so important in literature after all, that it would have been better to delete a Shakespeare text and replace it with physics.  Also, since not everyone has studied biochemistry at the high school level, college level bio-chemistry is going to be pretty much same to high school bio chemistry, so that everyone is able to study, thereby not taking college level studies a notch up. I perfectly see where you’re taking quality education with this.

You, respected sir have created an ideal university, where professors keep shouting and administrators turn a blind eye. Where students aren’t able to learn and nobody listens. Where cut offs keep rising and quality education keeps going downwards.

Congratulations sir. My heartiest wishes to you in your endeavour to achieve life, liberty and happiness, and perpetual deafness.

Yours sincerely
A student who being in second year is facing the misfortune of not studying in FYUP.

Image Credit: South Campus website

The annual parliamentary debating tournament of Hansraj College was held from 17th-20th March, 2013. The festival is seen as one of the most awaited debating festivals in the Delhi University debating circuit because of the quality of debaters and adjudicators it invites, while the prize money is an added perk. The tournament saw the participation of 24 teams from across colleges that are active in the debating circuit and it also saw cross teams that included some senior debaters. After a course of five preliminary rounds, eight teams broke into the quarterfinals that included teams from the colleges- SRCC, KMC, HINDU, JGLS and two cross teams. The finals were held between Tarand and Nouman from Hindu, competing for the Shanti Narayan trophy with Siddhartha Thyagarajan (ex-RAMJAS)and Aishwarya Iyer (Hindu). The topic of the debate was “This house believes that social movements should discard the use of euphemisms.” Tarang and Nouman successfully defended the motion and won the trophy. The adjudicating panel of the finals included some of the best adjudicators in the debating circuit, such as Anirudh(Hansraj), Shaurya(Hansraj) , Tarun(Hansraj), Shuvam(Hansraj), Shachi(ex-Hansraj), Abeer(Hansraj) and Navin(ex-KMC). The best adjudicator prize went to Rijul from Hindu and best speaker went to Aashay Sahay (ex-RVCE). Shachi Seth and Navin Kumar were the Adjudication Core of the tournament. The tournament got a lot of positive response in terms of its smooth running, efficient administration, and running on time, the latter feature being something mostly absent in debating tournaments. The tournament was also an interesting one in terms of the unique strategies implemented to decide proposition and opposition in the post breaks round. Ditching the conventional coin toss, the Hansraj debsoc decided that proposition and opposition will be decided through means of rock-paper-scissors, tip-top, arm wrestling or dance offs. Particularly interesting was the dance off between Vardhan from KMC and Tarang from Hindu in the quarterfinals. The tabs team was highly praised for carrying out the fastest tabbing in the history of debates, with the tabs being ready for the next round within 5 minutes. Overall, the 6th Shanti Narayan was very efficiently run, stuck to time rules and provided an unforgettable debating experience. Photo Credits: hansrajdelhi.batchmates.com Siddhi Goel [email protected]]]>

The annual street play festival of Shaheed Sukhdev College of Business Studies : Manthan, was held from 15th February to 3rd march 2013. Organized by Verve, the street play society of CBS, Manthan is seen as one of the largest street play festivals in Asia .

Manthan attracted over 40 teams from Delhi, Mumbai and Chandigarh, from universities such as Punjab University, Delhi University, Indraprastha University and Bombay University.

The main event took place from 25th February to 3rd March, which involved performances by the participating teams in public places like market complexes, malls, etc and various schools and colleges. The highlight of the event was CBS’s performance at India Gate. It was the first college level street play society in India to perform at this venue, as the permission to perform here is very difficult to obtain. The closing ceremony of Manthan took place at India International on March 3.

The participating teams chose topics of social relevance as their performance themes. Some examples are disability, sedition, innocence, reservation, etc.

One distinct feature of Mantham was that through these street plays, they aimed to reach out to the kids living in slum areas rather than limiting themselves to an urban audience.

Picture Credits: Pinvite.grouptable.in

Siddhi Goel 

[email protected]

One fine day(a few days ago), the nation woke up to a shocking revelation: Ram Singh, of the 16th December Delhi gang rape dishonor, was found hanging in his cell in Tihar Jail. Hundreds of questions were thrown at the administration of Tihar, the in mates, the guards and the police. ArnabGoswami shouted his lungs out at the failure of the state in keeping one criminal safe.

The mystery of his death still hasn’t been resolved. Going by logic, it seems virtually impossible that Ram Singh, with one functioning hand, could make a noose out of his clothes, create a make-shift hanging apparatus, in the middle of the night without disturbing the sleep of his fellow inmates in the same cell or the guard on duty. However, looking at the flipside, the murder of a high profile criminal inside a jail, seems even more atrocious, especially that no evidence has been found yet.

The aim of this article is not to solve the mystery. It is just to highlight two very pertinent questions:

1)Is the apparatus of state functioning so brittle that it can’t even keep criminals inside the jail safe?(However oxymoronic this might sound), and

2) Are we seeing a shift in the responsibility in terms of who grants justice to the citizens? Are citizens trying to take the law in their own hands?

Addressing question one first. Tihar Jail houses criminals more than 200% of its capacity. Though separate cells are meant for high profile criminals, they are seldom used because of the over-whelming number of criminals, unless it’s an absolute state interference in keeping a criminal isolated.

The other part is of the patrolling that happens in jails, by guards. Reports suggest that CCTV cameras were installed in his cell, but clearly there is a difference between installation of a camera and its actual functioning. Also, guards are supposed to keep a check on the activities of the inmates, whether fellow inmates tried to murder him, or he killed himself, neither activity should have gone undetected in the eyes of the guards.

Coming to question two, in a state it is solely the judiciary that has the right to pass a sentence on a criminal. We don’t encourage citizens to become anti-vigilantes. If it was a murder, what prompted other people to murder him? The fact that we know how poor our judicial system is and that justice is seldom granted? Maybe.The fact that he was a national enemy?Again, maybe.

And if it was suicide, what prompted him to take such a step? Frustration?Maybe.Fear?Maybe. But the state doesn’t work on the whims and fancies of petty criminals, and their wish can’t be our command.

Whatever really happened, amidst all this, apart from life, justice too has been lost.
Image source: http://www.indiatvnews.com

In a time where most coaching institutes at the school level are looked as money minting machines, this one clearly stands out. Pratham is a coaching institute that specifically caters to preparing students for various entrance examinations at the under graduate level.

Formed in 2009, Pratham is the result of the brain storming of 3 pass-outs of Shaheed Sukhdev College of Business studies. The bedrock of the idea of forming such an institute was to impart education to students that made them look beyond the 2 sides of books and build a smart career by widening their horizon and exposing them to the plethora of career opportunities that today’s world gives them. The International Institute of Financial Markets was formed by these 3 friends in 2008 and Pratham is a brand that functions under the banner.

Pratham aims to facilitate students in making an informed choice post class 12. They organize workshops in schools across Delhi introducing students to the various entrances, like Mass Communication, Law, BBS, BBA, BFIA etc. Pratham has coaching centres all across Delhi, where students are taught not only how to crack these entrances, but also build their personality, suited according to their chosen field of expertise. Pratham’s support to students is not only just limited to teaching how to clear entrances, but they further train you to clear the Group Discussions and Personal Interviews that follow. Such is the track record of Pratham, that in 2011, they had 6 All India Rank 1s, and in 2012 they had 7.

Pratham provides free entrance preparation to students who wish to reappear in the entrance exams, and also to a chosen 10 students. The atmosphere at Pratham is conducive to learning, where the teachers are more like friends, and help students in every way.

Pratham plans to expand its area of working to post graduate entrances like GMAT, SAT, CPT soon.

Visit www.prathamonline.com for further details.